For the record, I am all for integrated amp-speaker designs IF you can not COMPROMISE the amp or the speaker to meld the two.
I did very little in the design of the WAMM, except that my technician supplied standard OPamp replacements with a hybrid jfet input, 5534 output on a minidip socket. However, the WAMM was one of the most fantastic speaker systems I have ever had the chance to hear. I used to visit Dave Wilson on occasion in the '80's and listen all evening on his WAMM system. It was a wonderful experience.
But Dave certainly liked to link you to it for that extra cred 🙂. Don't blame him either.
For the record, I am all for integrated amp-speaker designs IF you can not COMPROMISE the amp or the speaker to meld the two.
No reason why it should -- if it does it's just bad engineering. And we're not having any of that in here... 🙂
A marginal class D amp would do wonders to compromise the sound quality. Not all class D amps sound good, you know. My best bet is to bi amp with a small discrete tweeter amp, coupled with a good class D amp (or 2).
Whereas in my case experience of the Wamm set-up was limited to a pair in Italy which was driven by Spectral amps with a Spectral MC front-end. That system sounded dreadful....but, to be fair, they had recently been delivered, were only a half dozen hours in use...and were waiting for Mr Wilson to come over to set them up properly. The main problem was a lack of coherence/intregation. I had previously heard the same front-end with big Jadis amps and Sound Lab A-3 electrostatic panels and that was so bland. (different location). Yet the same speakers (A-3) with JC Levinsons sounded very very good indeed.
(Of course the multi $K cables had not yet 'run-in'!!!!)
(Of course the multi $K cables had not yet 'run-in'!!!!)
Last edited:
Isn't there some inherent noise penalty for only using 1 watt of a 100 watt amplifier?
I don't think so. If there were then that would imply the snr of any particular amplifier changed with the applied supply voltage.
given relative standardized input level the higher power amp for the same load Z will have higher gain - which amplifies its input stage noise more than a lower gain device with similar input device noise
this effect is most obvious in the headphone world with sensitive IEM - some with 130 dB re 1 V sensitivity - you will hear hiss with a high gain amp driving them
this effect is most obvious in the headphone world with sensitive IEM - some with 130 dB re 1 V sensitivity - you will hear hiss with a high gain amp driving them
Last edited:
Gain in most commercial power amps is not STANDARDIZED to 28.2 to be equivalent to 1W with 0.1V in and 100W for 1V in, and 400W for 2V in. This is to be compatible with THX home theater specs.
A marginal class D amp would do wonders to compromise the sound quality.
Good engineering costs no more than poor engineering. Often even less.
Any evidence for that remarkable claim?
Nothing remarkable. If you haven't heard it ...... ???????
Common Knowledge AFAIK ...
Isn't there some inherent noise penalty for only using 1 watt of a 100 watt amplifier?
There can be ..... That's where the "everything else equal"
comes in ......
I and my team in Bangkok designed and built the Wilson EQ/xover unit for him. Still make them for him.
THx-RNMarsh
THx-RNMarsh
Nothing remarkable. If you haven't heard it ...... ???????
Common Knowledge AFAIK ...
If they're both in their linear regions (not clipping), then how is this possible?
Does the extra zero on faceplate do the trick? Surely that's common knowledge.
Nothing remarkable. If you haven't heard it ...... ???????
Common Knowledge AFAIK ...
OK, so no evidence.
If they're both in their linear regions (not clipping), then how is this possible?
Does the extra zero on faceplate do the trick? Surely that's common knowledge.
Because they are not in the linear regions! 1 watt average level for recorded music probably needs 100 watts. For a live classical concert more like 1,000 watts. Of course if you are listening to vinyl on headphones with such margins, DON'T DROP THE NEEDLE!
(Do you really think the OP was measuring the actual levels?)
1 watt average level for recorded music probably needs 100 watts. For a live classical concert more like 1,000 watts.
Whaaaaat?

Whaaaaat?![]()
I haven't found any LP's with a crest factor of 10 maybe there are CD's or other recorded sources.
Well lets think about that. Removing the edge cases
Scott (listens quietly)
Richard (likes it loud)
Ed (likes to deafen thousands at a time).
If we calibrate according to THX spec (std) then -20dBFS is 85dB at the listening position or 1W for a pair of std speakers and 2m listening distance, lets say 2W for 4m. 0dBFS is 17dB above that for a sinusoid so 100W and 103dB. This seems to be loud enough for most men and all wives!
Go active and immediately you drop to 2x50W. You don't have to throw away power for baffle step so you could even argue 50W and 25W would be perfect.
With modern recordings needing more headroom than that is just damaging your hearing and annoying the neighbours.
Or have I missed something?
Scott (listens quietly)
Richard (likes it loud)
Ed (likes to deafen thousands at a time).
If we calibrate according to THX spec (std) then -20dBFS is 85dB at the listening position or 1W for a pair of std speakers and 2m listening distance, lets say 2W for 4m. 0dBFS is 17dB above that for a sinusoid so 100W and 103dB. This seems to be loud enough for most men and all wives!
Go active and immediately you drop to 2x50W. You don't have to throw away power for baffle step so you could even argue 50W and 25W would be perfect.
With modern recordings needing more headroom than that is just damaging your hearing and annoying the neighbours.
Or have I missed something?
I haven't found any LP's with a crest factor of 10 maybe there are CD's or other recorded sources.
I have a few recordings touching 14 but those are rare.
I haven't found any LP's with a crest factor of 10 maybe there are CD's or other recorded sources.
Apparently, explicitly specifying "not clipping" by Derfnofred was insufficient.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II