You could try cross-examining the statements which clearly conflict with your experience (first post). Or another tack - ask a helpful poster to comment or even cross-examine stuff posted you don't understand or seems wrong to you.
You missed it ...
Re-read your posts!
IAC ... and all the mostly pointless binary math aside ... George's orig. query is the topic at hand.
Search for "Spectral analysis and bit depth/resolution". Mags like Stereophile use the following procedure:
Re-read your posts!
IAC ... and all the mostly pointless binary math aside ... George's orig. query is the topic at hand.
Search for "Spectral analysis and bit depth/resolution". Mags like Stereophile use the following procedure:
Found it!
This will be easy to follow, even by non-tech oriented types. Good explanations of pro's and con's of digital vol control.
From ESS no less:
http://www.esstech.com/files/3014/4095/4308/digital-vs-analog-volume-control.pdf
Jan
This will be easy to follow, even by non-tech oriented types. Good explanations of pro's and con's of digital vol control.
From ESS no less:
http://www.esstech.com/files/3014/4095/4308/digital-vs-analog-volume-control.pdf
Jan
Last edited:
Can't find what was never hidden!
But you missed this one altogether -- also from ESS/Martin Mallinson/RMAF 2011 presentation [I'm too lazy to read PDFs--YouTube to the rescue!]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYjHKv2_OqQ
But you missed this one altogether -- also from ESS/Martin Mallinson/RMAF 2011 presentation [I'm too lazy to read PDFs--YouTube to the rescue!]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYjHKv2_OqQ
There was a link to that paper from ESS in post no6 in this very thread.. 
What they say is basically that done right it's hard to match a digital solution when it comes to the noise floor.
What they don't touch is that many DAC's have lower distortion at lower output levels, which is a win for digital. Reduce level in digital domain, analog output stage of DAC works in a more linear region = less distortion.
What they also show is that noise floor is constant in the DAC output signal when using digital volume control. They say this is reducing SNR and that's why audiophiles don't want it.
What they don't adress is that that noise is analog noise from the output stages and it's inaudible. You don't need to lower this noise floor when you lower the actual signal.
What they say is basically that done right it's hard to match a digital solution when it comes to the noise floor.
What they don't touch is that many DAC's have lower distortion at lower output levels, which is a win for digital. Reduce level in digital domain, analog output stage of DAC works in a more linear region = less distortion.
What they also show is that noise floor is constant in the DAC output signal when using digital volume control. They say this is reducing SNR and that's why audiophiles don't want it.
What they don't adress is that that noise is analog noise from the output stages and it's inaudible. You don't need to lower this noise floor when you lower the actual signal.
Last edited:
Actually the paper I posted is the presentation you referred to - slides are identical.
If you check the YouTube you might actually see me sitting in that room
so I didn't 'miss it' - I was there!Jan
I can read and understand the PDF in about 1/10th of the time compared with the guy waffling around it and distracting my thought process. But YMMV I accept that.
Jan
Well it's not so much 'claims' as a reasoned explanation. It would be good if people finding an error in it would step up and say what the error is. It's not a matter of 'believing' it is right or wrong. If you can't find fault with it it would be logical to accept it.
jan
It's correct to say that as a signal gets weaker by a digital level adjustment, the SNR is reduced.
What we need to understand though is that we do not need constant SNR for all actual levels of a signal.
How would that be for a signal at the threshold of hearing.. would that signal also need 120db SNR?
Of course not!
According to the flawed audiophile thinking a digital recording wold to be totally crap always for any signal that is not at the MSB. And guess what.. only DC could be... want to listen to DC? (or square waves as I mentined earlier.. square waves is alternating polarity DC) When a high level signal goes from positive to negative amplitude maxima, it will exercise all bits. For the majority of time the signal will have that **** poor SNR that you are afraid of.
We don't hear things the way "you" think.
The constant noise floor in the digital example of ESS is analog. The actual noise (quantization errors turned to noise by addition of dither before truncating to 24bit) that comes from doing math is way below that floor.
What we need to understand though is that we do not need constant SNR for all actual levels of a signal.
How would that be for a signal at the threshold of hearing.. would that signal also need 120db SNR?
Of course not!
According to the flawed audiophile thinking a digital recording wold to be totally crap always for any signal that is not at the MSB. And guess what.. only DC could be... want to listen to DC? (or square waves as I mentined earlier.. square waves is alternating polarity DC) When a high level signal goes from positive to negative amplitude maxima, it will exercise all bits. For the majority of time the signal will have that **** poor SNR that you are afraid of.
We don't hear things the way "you" think.
The constant noise floor in the digital example of ESS is analog. The actual noise (quantization errors turned to noise by addition of dither before truncating to 24bit) that comes from doing math is way below that floor.
A few years back when I was running an all active crossover system I had my doubts about 24 bit digital volume control done by the player software, so I ran extensive tests. THD, IMD, harmonic structure, noise. I found nothing but reduced S/N ratio, as was expected, Signal in = signal out with lower amplitude. Tested from 15Hz to 22kHz
In listening tests vs analog volume control I could here no difference, even tho analog measured worse.
Testing was done on headphones, passive crossover speakers and active. No audible difference.
A year after that I built an ESS DAC with volume control. Same results. I now no longer worry about it. If there are audible differences, something is wrong with the system.
In listening tests vs analog volume control I could here no difference, even tho analog measured worse.
Testing was done on headphones, passive crossover speakers and active. No audible difference.
A year after that I built an ESS DAC with volume control. Same results. I now no longer worry about it. If there are audible differences, something is wrong with the system.
Pfft!
...and that's why I always wait for the YT version. Why hang out with that sordid sub-culture? And that rag AudioXpress ... whatever happened to the printed page?If you check the YouTube you might actually see me sitting in that room
No argument - I'm not qualified. But doesn't this all assume that the gain structure of the system is reasonably optimized. The OP changed his speakers for a set that had much higher sensitivity. This situation resulted in a perception of "reduced dynamics" at "normal" volume. In this situation (or at least some possible situation) normal volume for listening becomes low volume for the digital volume setting. When the system gain structure was corrected for the higher sensitivity speakers. The perception of reduced dynamics was no longer.
Sheldon
edit: Maybe essential reading for setting up a system: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=186018
Last edited:
In this or any specific case, of course it can be a question of poor implementation which results in distortion and audible noise. A series of tests would be needed to find out about that.
What a high sensitivity speaker can do (or a high SPL capability rig, be it a beefy amp and/or sensitivte speakers) is play at such high levels so you actually hear 16bit dither noise.
Also amp noise floor will come out at a higher level with a more sensitive speaker.
What a high sensitivity speaker can do (or a high SPL capability rig, be it a beefy amp and/or sensitivte speakers) is play at such high levels so you actually hear 16bit dither noise.
Also amp noise floor will come out at a higher level with a more sensitive speaker.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.