You said a 5534 60 db riaa stage would have grossness ...
You don't need a 5534 ... just the specs, right ?
You don't need a 5534 ... just the specs, right ?
Say 5 mV out of cartridge
60 db =~ 5 V out of 5534
What's the problem ?
Starts with the presumption that 5mV sensitivity = 5 mV max output. 20 dB of "linear" output over the sensitivity rating is entirely possible on a phonograph record under many circumstances not including everything from mistracking to warp output. 5 mV + 60 dB is 5V rms or 14V P-P. 50 mV turns into 140V P-P, simply not happening with conventional opamps.
However it is possible that some opamps recover from overload quicker with lower feedback.
As Bill Waslo said, if you think it sounds better that way have at it. However defending those choices beyond a personal subjective basis will be very hard.
Waly doesn't come across as a pigeon (though possibly not entirely potty trained yet)
I built the Alexander design in the need for speed days of the early 90s, anything with a slew rate over 100V/µs. The times when my tongue was still on the floor when I drooled over a Spectral DMA.
Can't say I disagree.
At least someone liked my work back then. I was young and innocent when I designed the DMA and DMC products.
You said a 5534 60 db riaa stage would have grossness ...
Where?
No global negative feedback would be best, however I do use global feedback usually for practical reasons, (like good specs). I would prefer to use NO global feedback in my designs, both phono, line and even power amps.
> Starts with the presumption that 5mV sensitivity = 5 mV max output
I said nothing about sensitivity .... but did take a 5mV rated cartridge as model
Right ........ Also that the 5mV is @ ~ 20Hz ......
I said nothing about sensitivity .... but did take a 5mV rated cartridge as model
Right ........ Also that the 5mV is @ ~ 20Hz ......
> Where?
Here :
> Of course you discount the issues of gain structure
> and overload margin at each stage out of hand.
Here :
> Of course you discount the issues of gain structure
> and overload margin at each stage out of hand.
Didn't your buddy , Walt Jung , have an article about usingNo global negative feedback would be best, however I do use global feedback usually for practical reasons, (like good specs). I would prefer to use NO global feedback in my designs, both phono, line and even power amps.
a 071 open loop for some audio circuit ?
Phono cartridges are typically rated for output with a nominal "0VU" of 5cm/sec lateral, equal to 3.54 cm/sec each channel, although sometimes this is poorly explained these days. And sometimes the spec is for 5 cm/sec each channel (3dB difference).
As 1audio has pointed out, +20dB above 0VU should be expected and accomodated linearly. The hottest clean cuts T. Holman investigated in his Audio mag article would hit +30dB, (and noise peaks higher than this must be at least clipped cleanly with fast recovery). This puts a strict limit on gain for a phono stage claiming linearity from +/- 15 volt supplies.
All good fortune,
Chris
As 1audio has pointed out, +20dB above 0VU should be expected and accomodated linearly. The hottest clean cuts T. Holman investigated in his Audio mag article would hit +30dB, (and noise peaks higher than this must be at least clipped cleanly with fast recovery). This puts a strict limit on gain for a phono stage claiming linearity from +/- 15 volt supplies.
All good fortune,
Chris
Last edited:
> I would prefer to use NO global feedback in my designs,
> both phono, line and even power amps.
You ever try lateral mosfets for outputs ?
> both phono, line and even power amps.
You ever try lateral mosfets for outputs ?
> This puts a strict limit on gain for a phono stage
> claiming linearity from +/- 15 volt supplies.
How much ?
> claiming linearity from +/- 15 volt supplies.
How much ?
> This puts a strict limit on gain for a phono stage
> claiming linearity from +/- 15 volt supplies.
How much ?
If you make the decision that +20VU is adequate headroom, and that your max unclipped output is +20dBV (28.3 volts peak-to-peak), and you don't do anything in your gain structure that limits output prematurely, like distributed RIAA equalization, then your max output for 0VU input is 0dBV. How much input voltage do you have midband at 0VU?
All good fortune,
Chris
Hitsware, I have used complementary power mosfets (originally Vfets) as power amp output stages since 1975. They have problems with high power amps like I normally to make. Still, for low power designs, they may be the best.
Does a 5534 @ 60db @ 1kHz make it ?If you make the decision that +20VU is adequate headroom, and that your max unclipped output is +20dBV (28.3 volts peak-to-peak), and you don't do anything in your gain structure that limits output prematurely, like distributed RIAA equalization, then your max output for 0VU input is 0dBV. How much input voltage do you have midband at 0VU?
All good fortune,
Chris
Does a 5534 @ 60db @ 1kHz make it ?
In a word, no.
In practice you can get away with an active eq (the F word) with 40 dB of midband gain. High output MM cartridges probably less. And this is a gross simplification.
Is there a current op-amp that will do it ?In a word, no.
In practice you can get away with an active eq (the F word) with 40 dB of midband gain. High output MM cartridges probably less. And this is a gross simplification.
I must have had weak cartridge : )
Last edited:
Does a 5534 @ 60db @ 1kHz make it ?
The very first thing to know is how much input voltage you're designing for. The idea of a universal phono input stage isn't practical - there is too much variation in phono cartridges' output levels. So the question remains: how much input signal are you designing for, midband at 0VU? Generalizing without this number is time wasted.
All good fortune,
Chris
There are two exceptions to my earlier generalization. If you're John Curl or Demian Martin you can design for the best cartridges of the day and assume that your clients will spring for the best, (but most of us peasants will be restricted to lesser cartridges of widely varying output.)
The other exception is DIY. That's us! But we have to know what signal we're to expect.
All the best,
Chris
The other exception is DIY. That's us! But we have to know what signal we're to expect.
All the best,
Chris
Neither John nor I have it so easy. We need to make provisions to support most probable cartridges or the complaining is endless. There are many options with various compromises or costs to support. In DIY the whole chain can be precisely optimized for a specific cartridge.
1V peak single ended (2V balanced pk - Pk) will drive 90 % of the power amps on the market to full power. Start from there and work backwards.
5mV cart at 1kHz gives 50 mV approx at 20 KHz. Add 'Holman's Hot Cut' and you get 500 mV out the cart.
Use all active RIAA when using op-amps - other topologies require severe tradeoffs wrt noise and/or OLM.
1st EQ stage gets you to circa 200 mV out nominal and after this you can add a 10 to 15 dB post EQ gain stage to bring signal levels up to 1V.
You now have > 20 dB OL margin across the audio band, lowest noise from opamps and accurate RIAA. The 5534 at less than a $ still shines even though it's a 30 year old part due to it's low input current noise.
For passive EQ, go discrete or tubed with appropriately high rails.
For ultimate in noise, JFET can get you another 8-10 dB reduction in noise over an opamp, but you have to parallel 'em and an all active topology is a good way to go. See the Syn08 and Denis Colin designs for inspiration, although they may be a bit OTT in some aspects. The BF882 is still available and its better than 1nV/rt Hz
5mV cart at 1kHz gives 50 mV approx at 20 KHz. Add 'Holman's Hot Cut' and you get 500 mV out the cart.
Use all active RIAA when using op-amps - other topologies require severe tradeoffs wrt noise and/or OLM.
1st EQ stage gets you to circa 200 mV out nominal and after this you can add a 10 to 15 dB post EQ gain stage to bring signal levels up to 1V.
You now have > 20 dB OL margin across the audio band, lowest noise from opamps and accurate RIAA. The 5534 at less than a $ still shines even though it's a 30 year old part due to it's low input current noise.
For passive EQ, go discrete or tubed with appropriately high rails.
For ultimate in noise, JFET can get you another 8-10 dB reduction in noise over an opamp, but you have to parallel 'em and an all active topology is a good way to go. See the Syn08 and Denis Colin designs for inspiration, although they may be a bit OTT in some aspects. The BF882 is still available and its better than 1nV/rt Hz
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II