World's best midrange Blind Testing - Need your help.

+1

Guys,

I think the same rules should apply to all....

This is Jons thread and he has the democratic right to conduct whatever tests he likes in whatever way he likes....He asked for some help in compiling a list of drivers....He received a good selection and has thanked us for our suggestions.

Now a few of the "usual suspects", the so called "heavy hitters" who are only big fish within the tiny (and diminishing) pond of DIY loudspeakers....Have indeed hounded Jon to the point that he is withdrawing from further public sharing.....

You established members should be ashamed of yourselves....
Just because Jon is obviously successful and is able to put significant resource into his audio projects he has been hounded by a small group of obviously less well heeled closed minded individuals….. Jealous or what....?

The closed minded attitude displayed by those who claim to be open minded is shameful…
“If you don’t do it our way its no good”….You one horse town guys are absolutely the single biggest downside to this otherwise excellent forum.

If I was in charge of this forum heads would roll….Dustin I urge you to read this thread and think about how Jon has been treated.

Derek.

PS I have no connection with Jon, in fact he has dismissed my advice totally, which is his choice, take it or leave it…This post is not about the technical aspects of Jons post, its about the attitude of existing members towards a new member.😡
 
I now better understand why some people use compression drivers hornless. Can sure be fun, especially in home audio environment where ultra high SPL is not needed.
That being said, i find his overall performance far than stellar for the price tag.

Even in the mid-hi region (where a horn as little effect), he lacks of focus, life-likeness and overall feeling that leads to music enjoyment. And that is even with EQing... I cannot imagine for a single second this driver winning against the ATC, 10F or Voxativ in the appreciation blind test. Cannot compute that.

For these reasons and also the fact that i will inevitably face some arguments about using a short horn instead of a huge 400hz horn (i cannot use big horn because of the logistic/config of the test), i'm giving a ''Pending elimination'' status to the Radian.

Using a compression driver without a horn is pointless........any links to these "people" using cds without a horn?

I also don't see the point in using a cd with a less than optimum horn, and the optimum horn for that driver will be fairly large (depends on your definition of large). Your comment about a horn having little effect in the mid-high region is simply not true in any sense at all. It seems you don't have any practical experience with horns and that's ok. You might as well scratch the cd from your list.
 
Using a compression driver without a horn is pointless........any links to these "people" using cds without a horn?

I also don't see the point in using a cd with a less than optimum horn, and the optimum horn for that driver will be fairly large (depends on your definition of large). Your comment about a horn having little effect in the mid-high region is simply not true in any sense at all. It seems you don't have any practical experience with horns and that's ok. You might as well scratch the cd from your list.

You can use a CD hornless, it's feasible. I was able to EQ our modified Radian 950 with surprisingly decent results, down to 450hz, no audible distortion or anything that made me say ''that's an absolute no-go''...

Here is a comment from this very website:

Just to present a minority view, though, I'd say that a hornless compression driver isn't necessarily always a non-starter. Like any driver, you simply have to look at its capabilities in the intended alignment and judge whether it fits your goals. Sans horn, you have to take its reduced power handling into account and its likely non-flat FR.

Common wisdom isn't always wisdom. A bare compression driver certainly won't always work as you might hope, but there is a small sub-set of cases in which it might work very well.

That being said: we finally WON'T use any CD.
Much more because of it's lack of popularity among people who follows that test and also logistic problems involved for our blind identification test with a horn (we were to use a horn, not hornless, bytheway).

* also, the remaining drivers in the pre-selection process are so good (competitive) that we have to let some go. We didnt feel any of the CD would've cause a big surprise...
 
Last edited:
Using a compression driver without a horn is pointless........any links to these "people" using cds without a horn?

I run a 2426 bare naked on top of 2226 in BR @ 1.2k & prefer it by far over any horn or cd I have tried yet. Very realistic without any hint of Horn........... I am @ 9' for listening position & only one seat. Imaging is pin point. All ran with 45 SET useing stock SR4725 passive XO, albiet going full active as experiment.


http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/mult...mpression-driver-need-horn-3.html#post2025850


also seen it on some french discussion board as well. People seem to enjoy it.
 
intriguing

must say I have considered using a CD without a horn, but I've never seen it or measures to show what the output would be like - there's a nice Visaton one that looks like the diaphragm is flush to the mounting flange, which id love to try with a very short wave guide similar to what many load domes with.

Food for thought, thanks.

(id also like to try Audax HM100Z0 for the mid, but alas I don't trust the few sites that seem to stock them, teamaudio etc)
 
You can use a CD hornless, it's feasible. I was able to EQ our modified Radian 950 with surprisingly decent results, down to 450hz, no audible distortion or anything that made me say ''that's an absolute no-go''...

Here is a comment from this very website:



That being said: we finally WON'T use any CD.
Much more because of it's lack of popularity among people who follows that test and also logistic problems involved for our blind identification test with a horn (we were to use a horn, not hornless, bytheway).

* also, the remaining drivers in the pre-selection process are so good (competitive) that we have to let some go. We didnt feel any of the CD would've cause a big surprise...

A 6in long slotted K tube can do wonders with a CD and not have to be a horn. It at least provides impedance matching of the CD's high pressure waves to the ambient surroundings and a wide smooth polar response better than most real horns. Try it sometime - use cardboard even. Anything is better than a step boundary condition of going from throat to 2pi space instantaneously. Without a horn or other waveguide you have a horrible impedance mismatch which not only ruins efficiency it has a large reflection boundary that causes response dips.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/mult...e-hf-waveguides-how-many-have-tried-them.html

To try a bare CD and then to rule it out because it doesn't sound good is like using a cone driver without a baffle and saying it has no bass. Sure it has bass if you put your ear 10mm away from it.
 
Last edited:
must say I have considered using a CD without a horn, but I've never seen it or measures to show what the output would be like - there's a nice Visaton one that looks like the diaphragm is flush to the mounting flange, which id love to try with a very short wave guide similar to what many load domes with.

Food for thought, thanks.

(id also like to try Audax HM100Z0 for the mid, but alas I don't trust the few sites that seem to stock them, teamaudio etc)

According to my experimentations, without an EQ it's unthinkable.

Also i'd like to note (again) that i did this with a modified PB950 with spacer (provided by Radian) that allows EQ correction in the lower frequencies. Works very well compared to stock one.

The downside is the price.
The upside is you could put up a pretty decent, almost compact, and powerful 2-way using a woofer (or subwoofer such TIW250XS) along with that modified PB950 and a miniDSP (plateamps ?) and get a solid 10 octave with no crossover at all in the mid/mid-hi.
 
To try a bare CD and then to rule it out because it doesn't sound good is like using a cone driver without a baffle and saying it has no bass. Sure it has bass if you put your ear 10mm away from it.

Yes, i do know that.

But then again, putting the CD in the test with anything less than a perfectly matched horn for the test's parameters was not a good idea either:
Using an EQed hornless/shorthorn CD on a baffle WOULD'VE work, but it's so unusual that is pointless for us...

So, anyway, the CD option is out.

Still, we'll do ''unofficial'' testing with some short 600hz horn just for the pleasure. 🙂
 
Yes, i do know that.

But then again, putting the CD in the test with anything less than a perfectly matched horn for the test's parameters was not a good idea either:
Using an EQed hornless/shorthorn CD on a baffle WOULD'VE work, but it's so unusual that is pointless for us...

So, anyway, the CD option is out.

Still, we'll do ''unofficial'' testing with some short 600hz horn just for the pleasure. 🙂

If you only need it to go to 600Hz you really should try to listen to a Heil AMT. the big 12lb one. It has amazing transient dynamics and clarity. No sibillance. Very nice and my vote as the best tweeter and almost a mid range ever.
 
HM 100ZO

must say I have considered using a CD without a horn, but I've never seen it or measures to show what the output would be like - there's a nice Visaton one that looks like the diaphragm is flush to the mounting flange, which id love to try with a very short wave guide similar to what many load domes with.

Food for thought, thanks.

(id also like to try Audax HM100Z0 for the mid, but alas I don't trust the few sites that seem to stock them, teamaudio etc)

Hey Mondo,
I'm sorry to have to admit, but I do not recognize the flag of your country. Where are you at ? I have a pair of HM 100ZO scheduled to be used in my next project. Might be several weeks though, because I move slow. They are supposed to sound superb, and yes I do realize with them being such a small driver, 600 or 700 Hz might be the lowest they can manage. I bought my pair at Madisound. Perhaps they can ship to you ?

I'll try to remember to report back my very honest findings on this little gem.
 
If you only need it to go to 600Hz you really should try to listen to a Heil AMT. the big 12lb one. It has amazing transient dynamics and clarity. No sibillance. Very nice and my vote as the best tweeter and almost a mid range ever.

heard it already. Very nice sounding driver, indeed. Airy and smooth.

I tend to prefer my tweeters a bit more incisive, though.
But my reference for high detail AND smoothness is the 70-20XR.

Can't wait to try the big Beyma's, though.
 
Falcon Acoustics lists them as 'in stock':
Audax HM100Z0 Aerogel 10cm 4" woofer

Never had any problems with them.

Thanks! I didn't think of Falcon

@Scott:

I work slowly as well, 2 years plus and I'm still refining my towers. However, flawed as they were I'm still in love with the HDA sound of my first build and I could never afford the HM range when i built those and settled for the AP range.

(I'm in the UK, England.around here st George's flag has a bad rep, but hey. If I was welsh id show their flag instead 🙂)
 
Last edited:
]Mondo...I do not recognize the flag of your country

England.

diyAudio - View Profile: mondogenerator

About Me TAB

320px-Flag_of_England.svg.png
+
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
+
250px-Flag_of_Scotland.svg.png


=
300px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png


I always loved flags 🙂

dave