"Proper" TDA3116 PCB

Status
Not open for further replies.
Steveeboy, the bootstrap caps should/must be smd so they can get close enough to the chip! Othewise all you'll hear is white noise! I strongly recommend getting a cheap 10usd temperature controlled soldering iron from ebay! All my friends have bought one and they work excellent and last forever🙂 Smd soldering is made easy with that fine tip on those🙂
Btw, I just recently put a 22uF ceramic smd cap on the voltage pins of the tpa3116 chip in a hope to reduce hiss. Only large caps on this board stock. I didn't help one bit! From this I do not think all the smd psu filtering caps on this board will actually help all that much on hiss? I would suggest using that space for a the larger electrolytic psu caps instead. I guess I'm in happyrabits camp when it comes to placing the psu caps.
Have anyone seen some research of what is the reason of hiss? Would the higher (1.2MHz) switching frequency avoid the hiss? I've been toying with these cards for weeks and it takes a lot of effort to lower the noise floor on all stock cards available.

Happyrabit are you going to run your board at 1.2MHz? I really like that layout! Have you made the grounding trace wider on purpose? I think I read somewhere that the ground trace should be a bit wider than the trace on top to reduce RF interference. Is this whats going on there?


22uF of what voltage rating? I'm guessing there weren't much uF left due to DC bias. As for the TPA3132D2 (TPA3116 in QFN package) I use in my layout, there isn't any hiss at all. (400-1200kHz dead silent) I even don't use any 10R+330pF snubbed nor LC filter. Haven't tried without but I use a simple RC-Filter on the AVCC-pin. (10R 1uF, increasing the resistance is not a good idea there)

Additionally there a 1k Rs right in front of the input pins to block HF coming from GSM (forming an RC with the help of stray capacitance).

I'd consider to check your AVCC decoupling first.

PCBs avail, mainly 0402 smd.
 
Last edited:
Gmarsh, do you mean the audio input caps? All the boards have this hiss at one level or another. Just on this layout its higher than usual and irritating since I'm using the card for nearfield listening. I have changed the audio input caps and put the newer ones even closer to the chip but it didn't help.. I just figured it had something to do with the output layering being bad; TPA3116 50W x 2 Dual Channel Class D Digital Audio Amplifier Board 100W 8V 25V | eBay
Yeah. Remove the input coupling caps and see if the hiss goes away - audio will obviously go away too.

If hiss stays, it could be something like terrible decoupling, wrong value cap on GVDD. If it goes away, I'd finger the input circuitry.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
A key benefit of the glasses is the range of magnifications. I find them comfortable and often leave them on for hours. I don't consider them chic...indeed they are the fast track to a a bad hair day. They do get more use than my Mantis stereo magnification system.

My drug store glasses are for reading and less demanding work. The are one of the many 'gifts' that come with middle age.
 
Doctormord, after some looking I found the answer from Abraxalito. (page 300 tpa3116 thread.) I will try this mod first. Did you try different values on that filter?

That's what I said. 🙄 10R+1uF, same like 1R+10uF (same freq). Your millage may vary, it depends on the layout. (You won't try anything greater than 100R, making things worse)

470uF is absolutely not necessary, but Abraxalito is also using some 470000uF for PVCC.. 🙄🙄🙄 Not my business.
 
I should have mentioned they are hinged so you can just push them up and out of the way.

A key benefit of the glasses is the range of magnifications. I find them comfortable and often leave them on for hours. I don't consider them chic...indeed they are the fast track to a a bad hair day. They do get more use than my Mantis stereo magnification system.

My drug store glasses are for reading and less demanding work. The are one of the many 'gifts' that come with middle age.
 
Yay decoupling simulation. Trying various parts and package sizes now to achieve a low wideband impedance.

eqvPJYv.png


Black curve (unlabeled) is the ugly one. When capacitor #1 is above its series resonance and capacitor #2 is below, you effectively get a L and C in parallel which form a tuned circuit, creating a high impedance at their resonance. Ideally these don't end up anywhere where the amp will put a harmonic...
 
so the black line is the parallel combination of all the decoupling caps listed, in ohms at the chips power pin? I reckon the pcb has some losses to smooth all those woop-ti-doos out at least > 10 MHz
 
Last edited:
hi gmarsh,
Is there any merit in using TPA3118 in the board?
Without heatsink, the caps can be placed really close to the pins and changing caps may be easier..
I presume you have also include the avcc pin isolation as described in thread 2992.
regards

kp93300
 
I'm using TPA3118 currently. TPA3116 means I'd have to move the decoupling further away as you're saying, and it also means I'd have to find a suitable heatsink.

TI told me in the past that PVCC and AVCC absolutely must be the same voltage - and I'm concerned that if you add a RC filter on AVCC, PVCC can be significantly greater than AVCC when you first apply power due to the RC time delay.. hopefully not breaking anything. I'll check with TI on this one first, then consider it.
 
:santa3:

Hey Santa! 😉 :santa2:

:hohoho:

Are you piled-in deep my Eastern friend?! 😀
(gmarsh way be under a metre ... uh, 3 feet of snow! Perfect day for DIY.) 😀


I'm using TPA3118 currently. TPA3116 means I'd have to move the decoupling further away as you're saying, and it also means I'd have to find a suitable heatsink...

Funny you should say that... when I coined the phrase, 'wiener' [Wiener, 'we have a wiener / winner', hasslehawk] I wanted an all-feature, 'properly' designed PCB utilizing the excellent class-D / digital design knowledge here on Diyaudio.

Then I wanted to compare The Wiener to all the other 3116 designs as sort of a 'benchmark' (measurements and listening).

So I definitely want the 3116 to make comparisons as accurate as possible. The 3116 can be swapped in your design, correct?

As far as heatsinking ... I guess you guys just Rock! more than I do ( 🙁 ) because the 3116 doesn't even get warm under 19V and only makes a small heatsink warm at 24V.

For power testing with a sine wave maybe but ... what's your experience?

I think your board with the close decoupling (3118) with a 3116 installed and a small (or 'shaved' to clear the caps) heatsink would be ... perfect!

Did you add all the functionality? Power output adjust ( see what it's 'clipping' sounds like ), fault pin detect / reading?



...

TI told me in the past that PVCC and AVCC absolutely must be the same voltage - and I'm concerned that if you add a RC filter on AVCC, PVCC can be significantly greater than AVCC when you first apply power due to the RC time delay.. hopefully not breaking anything. I'll check with TI on this one first, then consider it.

What about that double diode circuit from one of those TDA729X threads?

TDA7293-hi-fi w diode.gif

[All I can find is a one diode circuit, I'm sure I saw a 2-diode version ... my Google-fu has failed master.... ]

It has 2 (exotic; I recall extra 'wings' on the diode symbol, schottky, barrier?) diodes, one reversed in series with the two ps pin. It keeps the pins a max of one diode drop difference. Choose the diodes to keep them as close as needed?

Cheers,
Jeff
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I can't find any posts on TPA3116/3118 AVCC decoupling on the E2E boards, other than when I asked about running different voltages on the two pins several months ago.

:santa3:

Hey Santa! 😉 :santa2:

:hohoho:

Are you piled-in deep my Eastern friend?! 😀
(gmarsh way be under a metre ... uh, 3 feet of snow! Perfect day for DIY.) 😀
Nah, Boston got the worst of it and we got probably 10cm here. Shovelled that off the driveway, then it rained and took care of the rest. It's been a pretty damn easy winter, I guess all that styrofoam I burned when I was a pyro kid paid off 🙂

Funny you should say that... when I coined the phrase, 'wiener' [Wiener, 'we have a wiener / winner', hasslehawk] I wanted an all-feature, 'properly' designed PCB utilizing the excellent class-D / digital design knowledge here on Diyaudio.

Then I wanted to compare The Wiener to all the other 3116 designs as sort of a 'benchmark' (measurements and listening).

So I definitely want the 3116 to make comparisons as accurate as possible. The 3116 can be swapped in your design, correct?
Yeah, the TPA3116 and TPA3118 have the same pinout and either can be installed on this board. Only difference between the two chips is the thermal pad on bottom versus top - both chips have the exact same silicon die so I wouldn't expect any difference in performance/sound.

As far as heatsinking ... I guess you guys just Rock! more than I do ( 🙁 ) because the 3116 doesn't even get warm under 19V and only makes a small heatsink warm at 24V.

For power testing with a sine wave maybe but ... what's your experience?

I think your board with the close decoupling (3118) with a 3116 installed and a small (or 'shaved' to clear the caps) heatsink would be ... perfect!

Did you add all the functionality? Power output adjust ( see what it's 'clipping' sounds like ), fault pin detect / reading?
You'll definitely need to shave/modify a heatsink, pretty much every part around the TPA (decoupling caps, bootstrap caps, etc) are all taller than the HTSSOP package itself so it'll be a close fit. I also haven't provided any means to mechanically attach a heatsink to the board. I'll just say if you use a TPA3116, you're on your own 🙂

I just have PLIMIT tied to GVDD. Makes sense for some applications, didn't really see the need for hooking it up here.

In my experience with the Boominator card, the TPA3118 will happily put out 50Wx2 RMS (20v peak into 4 ohms) at 1KHz without any issues, at room temperature - gets a bit warm to touch, but silicon can handle far hotter temperatures than fingers. If you're worried about heat or want high temperature operation, mount the card to a metal plate with standoffs and put a Berquist gap-pad between the card and the plate.
 
Yeah, I can't find any posts on TPA3116/3118 AVCC decoupling on the E2E boards, other than when I asked about running different voltages on the two pins several months ago.

Defference of EVM circuit for TPA3110D2 and TPA3130D2 - Audio Amplifiers Forum - Audio Amplifiers - TI E2E Community

TPA3110D2 and TPA3130D2 are different designs. The 10R resistor on TPA3110D2 EVM is intended for noise filtering for the AVCC pin. To minimize BOM cost, TPA3130D2 is designed to meet datasheet performance without the 10R resistor on AVCC. Adding the 10R to AVCC on TPA3130D2 should be fine. However, avoid large resistor values since it will cause a significant voltage different between AVCC and PVDD.
 
IMO it wont be "proper" not to fully support both 3116 and 3118 with an external heat sink that is available somewhere. IDK seems worthwhile to try to make it happen. seen a long skinny one somewhere.
It was on the wish list from day one! not sure yer baseline soldering underneath the chip sounds too newbee easy either, can we used some leftover artic silver or sumptin?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.