NinoSimona, Thanks for your quick reply. Seems it is
easier to just make another one for DSD alone.
easier to just make another one for DSD alone.
kukynas:And I'm thinking to buy ¸èÊ«µÂ Èý´úDAC-X9 ×î¾ßÄ£Äâζ ƽºâ½âÂëÆ÷ Ë«²¢WM8741 XMOS DSD-ÌÔ±¦Íø + M-Audio - M3-8 Active Studio Monitors : ???????? ? ?????????
lomonosoff: I don't know if X9 is worth +$300 but I might be wrong, never heard about M-audio speakers but if I understood well these are bit noisy due to internal amplifier and of course made for studio sound so all depended on if you like this kind of sound, I already bought this DAC so I'll be doing comparison once it arrives and finally decide which one to keep
kukynas:Want to take it WM8741 on trial and the main thing is not yet introduced a limit of 150 euros in Russia.
kukynas:Take risks, and by autumn they will order the DAC-X9(2XWM8741) and will use with your Audio GD Earth+OP01🙂
Serge, I was noticing that the less noise, the more that details
would come through, just by passive line filters alone, so I can imagine that the new regs are a huge upgrade.
I started out just looking for a more rich and solid tone or timbre with my mods, then discovered that clean power makes a big difference as well, but have only done minimal work in that area.
I would be interested in what gains can be had to the 8805 power supply chain...
I think that there is potential for interference with any of the components, but none of them are in contact with other traces or wires either, am sure that would be a problem.
I did partition off, with a steel panel, a section of my enclosure for the transformers, and use soft rubber feet, made a difference. Now just the leads go to the boards, separate from each other.
would come through, just by passive line filters alone, so I can imagine that the new regs are a huge upgrade.
I started out just looking for a more rich and solid tone or timbre with my mods, then discovered that clean power makes a big difference as well, but have only done minimal work in that area.
I would be interested in what gains can be had to the 8805 power supply chain...
I think that there is potential for interference with any of the components, but none of them are in contact with other traces or wires either, am sure that would be a problem.
I did partition off, with a steel panel, a section of my enclosure for the transformers, and use soft rubber feet, made a difference. Now just the leads go to the boards, separate from each other.
shunts
Valeri100: I just read this post : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/233282-weiliang-dac9-ak4399-28.html#post3983471
Maybe the Salas shunt is something for you. It's a flexible design, I might even try it myself. Each shunt has it's own rectifier/capacitor, and has remote sensing.
Valeri100: I just read this post : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/233282-weiliang-dac9-ak4399-28.html#post3983471
Maybe the Salas shunt is something for you. It's a flexible design, I might even try it myself. Each shunt has it's own rectifier/capacitor, and has remote sensing.
New AKM DAC chip announced yesterday
AK4375ECB | Product | AKM - Asahi Kasei Microdevices
It has a Class G headphone amplifier included.
Watch out for the Japanese Class G. It's very, very classy......
AK4375ECB | Product | AKM - Asahi Kasei Microdevices
It has a Class G headphone amplifier included.
Watch out for the Japanese Class G. It's very, very classy......
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Valeri100: I just read this post : http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/233282-weiliang-dac9-ak4399-28.html#post3983471
Maybe the Salas shunt is something for you. It's a flexible design, I might even try it myself. Each shunt has it's own rectifier/capacitor, and has remote sensing.
Hi Nino,
Thank you very much. This is interesting. This is definitely a solution which I will consider.
Has anyone tried to change the output resistor to something a bit lower than the 100 ohm that shows on the schematic?
I had some caddock film resistors in 12 ohm that sounded pretty good in another dac from the same designer.
Just a thought anyways, didn't mean to breakup the regulator banter...🙂
I had some caddock film resistors in 12 ohm that sounded pretty good in another dac from the same designer.
Just a thought anyways, didn't mean to breakup the regulator banter...🙂
Today I tried ADA4898 sound like,but it seems that not much is not enough bass,but in General, very smooth and tone verified op-amp.
Hi phaseHas anyone tried to change the output resistor to something a bit lower than the 100 ohm that shows on the schematic?
I had some caddock film resistors in 12 ohm that sounded pretty good in another dac from the same designer.
Just a thought anyways, didn't mean to breakup the regulator banter...🙂
I think the betterment in SQ was probably due to the better audio resistor you used.
But why not remove the resistor? For example the LME49710 has short circuit protection on-chip, so no resistor is needed; I don't know why it's used anyway, it's also not used in the single op-amp example in the datasheet.
Regards,
Nino
Yeah, could do the straight wire I suppose, just had two extra decent resistors, so it seemed a logical application I suppose, and the lower out put impedance hadn't been addressed here, so I thought I'd mention it.
Pretty good benefit per dollar if you stick with a wire wound...
Pretty good benefit per dollar if you stick with a wire wound...
stupid me... read the DS several times and missed that quality completely...🙁For example the LME49710 has short circuit protection on-chip
What is the purpose of the C17 390pF in the circuit? I found out it is actually 510pF in my kit.
Hi Sunsun22
The capacitor is part of the active filter system, together with the resistors and opamp itself. When using 510pF, the filters' cut-off frequency becomes 96 kHz instead of 109 kHz with 390pF. Also with 510pF, the signals' transfer function goes up slightly at the cut-off frequency, it's not entirely flat.
I think you can better use 390pF, because the pass-band is flatter with that value.
The capacitor is part of the active filter system, together with the resistors and opamp itself. When using 510pF, the filters' cut-off frequency becomes 96 kHz instead of 109 kHz with 390pF. Also with 510pF, the signals' transfer function goes up slightly at the cut-off frequency, it's not entirely flat.
I think you can better use 390pF, because the pass-band is flatter with that value.
latest update, I made some additional upgrade with Caps as below, analog supply part has now all caps as per schematics with Nichicon KA version, top of that I change those BC aluminum esr caps with ultra low Nippon Chemicon version, I couldn't hear any audible difference, but last week I upgraded analog part with HDAM modules as visible on the picture, hard to describe it properly but it's amazing, more dynamics, more punchy bass, no harshness at all, absolutely happy man 😀
free picture upload
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
free picture upload
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Line Level
- ebay:Weiliang Dual X2 AK4399 DAC with LCD