Can you run pos and neg signal of one channel through one B4 and the other channel (pos and neg) through another B4?
Best
Best
I'm using a DBX 223XS. I use it for bass only. Since my SFL-2 preamp has 2 sets of balanced outputs I run my main loudspeakers full range, with out the DBX, and run the 2nd set of outputs into the DBX for bass frequency's and attenuation only.
If I purchased a B4 crossover I'd be switching back to unbalanced connections and running everything thru the B4. My top cabs use passive X-overs.
Not sure if it would be worth doing, but there are a lot more choices of preamps if I went back to using unbalanced connections.
Plus who knows, my main MTM loudspeakers just might benefit from running thru the B4. I have know idea at this point.
If I purchased a B4 crossover I'd be switching back to unbalanced connections and running everything thru the B4. My top cabs use passive X-overs.
Not sure if it would be worth doing, but there are a lot more choices of preamps if I went back to using unbalanced connections.
Plus who knows, my main MTM loudspeakers just might benefit from running thru the B4. I have know idea at this point.
Can you run pos and neg signal of one channel through one B4 and the other channel (pos and neg) through another B4?
Of course.
😎
Why not DIY (also for balanced) ?
Replace the tube buffer by a JFET one as in the LPF schematics, and you have essentially the same thing :
My differential active crossover
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~apm3/diyaudio/DAXO_LP.gif
And for DIY, you have the choice of resistor and capacitor values for your exact requirement.
And no unnecessary DIP switch contacts in the signal path.
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~apm3/diyaudio/DAXO.html
Patrick
Replace the tube buffer by a JFET one as in the LPF schematics, and you have essentially the same thing :
My differential active crossover
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~apm3/diyaudio/DAXO_LP.gif
And for DIY, you have the choice of resistor and capacitor values for your exact requirement.
And no unnecessary DIP switch contacts in the signal path.
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~apm3/diyaudio/DAXO.html
Patrick
Last edited:
Hello mr.Pass,
I have a Pass XVR-1 and would like to try the new version of the B4 to hear if it sounds even better.
Would it be possible to have a balanced version of the new B4?
Thanks
I have a Pass XVR-1 and would like to try the new version of the B4 to hear if it sounds even better.
Would it be possible to have a balanced version of the new B4?
Thanks
Hi Zen Mod, Thanks for your answer, but I understood that option from reading post #84. However, I would prefer something neat directly from Pass, even if it costs double the price of a B4.
Last edited:
The buffer Juma uses in his LSK preamp is a good alternative to the Toshiba PP option. It uses readily available and inexpensive parts and performs quite well. If going balanced, consider LTP input that can accept balanced input, but having SE ouput. Simplifies the Xover part and the signal can be converted back to balanced any number of ways, with a transformer being one. I know transformers are terible things, but consider the fact that the exist in so many of the mixing tables that are a part of the recording process and they become less offensive.
........I know transformers are terible things........
careful with that axe , Eugene .......... you're on thin ice .....

Two B4's.
😎
Mr. Pass,
Wouldn't it be a potential issue in such a setup that the transistors in the two B4 (one for + and one for -) are not matched pairs, so it is not ideal in terms of balanced operation? Matched level adjustment pots, etc? Or perhaps I am wrong.
Would it be difficult to have two monoblocks (one per channel), with matched transistors, proper XLR connector etc so that a Two-chasis B4 would be a neat balanced unit? I only ask because perhaps such a unit (with a top power supply) could sound better than the PASS XVR-1 that I own, or not?
Last edited:
It is more important that the transistor pairs running push-pull are matched,
giving the offset and distortion cancellation. Matching between channels is
less important.
If you want matched channel pairs from one of mine, you will find them within
a single B4 or units with close serial #'s, as I do production from matched
batches.
😎
giving the offset and distortion cancellation. Matching between channels is
less important.
If you want matched channel pairs from one of mine, you will find them within
a single B4 or units with close serial #'s, as I do production from matched
batches.
😎
Dear Mr. Pass,
Thanks for your answer.
What are the power supply voltages (and amps) for the B4?
Thanks for your answer.
What are the power supply voltages (and amps) for the B4?
The first version of the B4 had a high pass attenuator, with -5, -10, -15, and -20dB switches.
The second version of the B4 has an attenuator selector, where you can select whether the front control knobs attenuate low pass or hi pass.
The second version of the B4 has an attenuator selector, where you can select whether the front control knobs attenuate low pass or hi pass.
Are any folks here using the B4 for open baffle? Or are most only using the B5 for that? Thanks.
Original '14 version of B4 for sale?
Does anyone have one of the original 2014 version of the First Watt B4 x/o they care to sell? I'm thinking the 600 ohm output of my EAR 868 pre-amp will like the 100k input impedance of the original better than the 10k of the revised version. Or am I mistaken? Forgive me, I'm not electronically educated like ya'll ;-).
Does anyone have one of the original 2014 version of the First Watt B4 x/o they care to sell? I'm thinking the 600 ohm output of my EAR 868 pre-amp will like the 100k input impedance of the original better than the 10k of the revised version. Or am I mistaken? Forgive me, I'm not electronically educated like ya'll ;-).
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Pass Labs B4 crossover questions