Keep cool, AP2. There is no problem. Just wait for L.C had received your PSUs and published the results, both measurements and listening impressions.
It will be time, then, to publish your own measurements if you don't agree with the L.C. ones or indicate other methods of measure to achieve a deeper exploration if needed.
For now, what was trying to say MASantos is just that it it not clever to seem to push or influence the L.C. evaluation in publishing comments about your product (he will not be influenced by any words or photos). Neither to fight with Cristi.
Oh, man, when i was in my R&D office, my best friends were my competitors. Everything was making us kind of brothers: We were passionated in the same domain, we were facing the same kind of problems daily, and, as we were at the same technical level, we could exchange deeply on our researches more than with everybody else.
The fight was on the market level: prices, quality, communications, patents: not our problems.Don't mix technique with business.
Yes, AP2, keep cool. You have read elogious L.C. comments about SMPS1200, so you can have respect for Cristi's work. I'm sure he is waiting for the results of your SMPS tests to decide if he can have the same respect for your own work, as all of us
This kind of comment: "Dear Cristi,I honestly do not know if you are a big ignorant in matters of smps" just deserve you.
Friendly,
Christophe.
You remember me, right this? "Do not mix business with technique."
It's fantastic!
From the first I put the first 2 measure, I have to defend myself. how do you explain this? my measurement consider that LC measure the my smps also. so, can not be as persuasion then. right for logic.
You want we analyze the measura that LC has made the ripple Cristi smps?
You think that I can analyze wrong? you know how many more engineers are silent on this thread?
You do not have to push me to that. ... I think
Esperado Sorry, I do not disturb the mechanisms of the LC thread.
but from the first time that I come in thread,put me in the shoes of: deficient, not serious, who wants to make fun of the customers.
If you allow, I have to defend my good person, and my work.
Yes, I am certainly an enemy, but certainly for charlatans.
No. *Nobody here* takes-you for what you said. Sorry, but pure paranoia.
PLEASE, for your own interest, keep silent and just wait for the results of this contest. You are just killing your own business by your crazy way to communicate, believe-me. Don't even think to answer this message.
May-be trouble with a foreign language, or whatever ? Who care ?
Last edited:
You not understand what will be the result? that aspect? it is clear from the very beginning, as I wrote.
You keep saying that I will lose business? repeat continuously.
Remember this to LC, just want the responsibility of choosing smps for his amp, without serious measure as fft smps, is right for audio. he has to be careful if lose the business, not me. as without fft on amp,, explain me, why you would choose the first one amp then?
I do not have anything wrong.
I shown 3-4 measure and I get insults . after , I see that the worst smps on the planet, is great ( but without measures ) .
trying to put me on the corner continually?
you understand that this can not be accepted ?
now stop. all is clare in this thread.
Last edited:
Ask me , how clean it is .
ask , how is it possible , have only 470uF in high voltage cell .
Ask me , how can I have a transformer of 2x2.7cm .
ask , how is it possible I not have spike ( it's are in MHz - GHz range) you know?
Happy Easter to all.
No need yet, maybe later, I just want to know the answer of these two questions:
2. what was the total capacitance connected on each rail both on board and external ?
3. how long time (second, minutes, hours?) you tested the SMPS output with 11.8A and what was used as a load ?
and the 4th one:
4. what is the ESR of the caps ?
2. what was the total capacitance connected on each rail both on board and external ?
3. how long time (second, minutes, hours?) you tested the SMPS output with 11.8A and what was used as a load ?
and the 4th one:
4. what is the ESR of the caps ?
Dear brothers,
Let the remembering of the sacrifice of the Lord's anointed Son fill our hearts with tender love for each other in the realization that we are indeed true brothers.
Don't critisize, judge or pre-judge your neighbor...lets send our love to others to bless them and to wish and promote their prosperity, as each human being is connected to each other...
Best wishes,
M.
Let the remembering of the sacrifice of the Lord's anointed Son fill our hearts with tender love for each other in the realization that we are indeed true brothers.
Don't critisize, judge or pre-judge your neighbor...lets send our love to others to bless them and to wish and promote their prosperity, as each human being is connected to each other...
Best wishes,
M.
I think things get a bit out of control here. This thread is about purchasing First One amplifier modules, not promoting other products. I suggest you, Roberto, that you tell exactly when the parcel was send to LC address and when should he get it. If you will send to LC tracking number too, all necessary noise around it will calm down.
In short...I suggest no more smps debate here, until LC tests DPS-500 and give final recomendation.
In short...I suggest no more smps debate here, until LC tests DPS-500 and give final recomendation.
+100
As far i'm in concern, and despite all the respect i can have for one or an other, Bruno, Cristi and AP2 are on my ignore list on this thread until the L.C measurements results and listening impressions will be published.
All this noise is painful.
Last edited:
Hi, today I will present exact delivery info to GB members. Currently I'm in assembly facility controlling the calibrations and QC. In a few days 200 modules will be ready to dispatch. Quality takes time hehe
Lazy Cat,