John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
JC's worst assertions have little to do with discrete vs IC.

You would have to be pretty close minded to dismiss all the threads here on chip-pres and chip-amps there are also plenty of commercial ones. There are many happy owners just as there are many happy owners of Quads and Magnepan's and of course toooobes or things with trannies.

Scott, I sent you an email. Have a question or two. Thanks
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
A simple rope lay is hardly "exotic."

*sigh*

se

Its also not Litz. Litzendraht or Litz wire is woven in a way that all the strands have an equal amount of length at the surface as in the center of the bundle. Rope lay will have conductors that will not ever get to the surface. Also rope lay does not indicate or imply insulated stranding, another key element (but not the only one) of Litz wire.
 
Member
Joined 2002
Paid Member
One question. The scope ground to ground, are they connected? If so, the scope frame will short the resistor.

That was one of the difficulties.:) See the first two attachments.

I spent some more hours to build a set of cvrs :D

George
 

Attachments

  • 1 Schematic of my jig.JPG
    1 Schematic of my jig.JPG
    83.3 KB · Views: 225
  • 2 Modified coaxial cable.JPG
    2 Modified coaxial cable.JPG
    189.4 KB · Views: 223
  • 3 Pic of the jig.JPG
    3 Pic of the jig.JPG
    125.5 KB · Views: 221
  • 4 the family of groundside cvr.JPG
    4 the family of groundside cvr.JPG
    86.3 KB · Views: 221
You must have very wrong settings, Frank. I have checked it, and it does not make anything wrong to signals and files.
Unfortunately, Pavel, this is in the hairy area of the internals of the PC altering the quality of reproduction, depending upon precisely how the file is accessed, processed while playing, etc. In diyAudio this will bring the wrath of the objectivists down upon one with full force, but the truth for me is, with my setup, that it is too much of a factor impacting the quality.

As an example, in some of those listening tests we were doing, A vs. B of a track, say B is 'superior' in Nero - try in foobar ABX, B is now poorer than A was in Nero.

And yes, I've done the rounds with the settings, several times, checked comments on the web, etc.

I'm sure nothing is 'technically' wrong - it's just enough of a negative to get in the way of comparing with the right attitude ...
 
An interesting point with warmup 'stretching' of cheap audio gear is that there are very obvious, audible to anyone benefits along with the "more subtle" ones. If there is a moment in the track where the cold system is clearly overloading, for a precise volume - the distortion is of the obvious variety; then, after an hour or so that same passage can be played at a considerably higher volume and replay absolutely cleanly - this is blind Freddie stuff ... ;)
 
I like x or y, which do I like best?

Answering such question is easy for me. I just live with them for some period of time. Sleep with the music on each of them.

I'm not saying that it has been that easy. The last frustration was regarding a phenomena where with bad recording a resolving system will be unbearable. I tried hard to proof that it is not true. Now I don't have the issue anymore.
 
Its also not Litz.

Of course it is. It's called Type 2 litz.

Litzendraht or Litz wire is woven in a way that all the strands have an equal amount of length at the surface as in the center of the bundle.

And when you take a number of strands of individual wires, twist them together, and then take a number of those bundles and twist them together, as with a rope lay, that's what you get. Each individual wire on average over a given length will occupy all radial positions from the center outward.

se
 

Attachments

  • Image2.jpg
    Image2.jpg
    75.5 KB · Views: 196
my ears or specs...

I trust my ears too. Ears or specs? Remember how some people use advanced measurement tools then tweak the final result by ears. I always thought that there must be something wrong with my microphone, something wrong with my procedure, something wrong with my models, etc. But the inaccuracy should be minimal, and here I trust my ears to be more accurate :D

I initially thought that, okay I'm not good at measurement works (some said it depends on the man behind the tools), so lets see if with times things will change. What changed was that I trust my ears even more (because now I can see the correlation between figures and perceived sound).

BTW, I don't regret believing in my ears. Why? Because enjoyment in listening to musics is very important for me, and my ears can give me that.
 
One thing I did learn from one of the audiologists was that those quite a few who do believe they have super human hearing, don't have and those normal people often have hearing that is far better than they expected. What the GEB often have though is belief in there hearing abilities, that precludes the necessity of any further investigation as to what is changing the sound. Gosh some can even determine where the interference is coming from in there system without the tools the poor objectives have to cart around.

Marce, I hope you learned something new from PMA's (even SY's) responds to your statement. The data is not wrong. It is how you and the audiologist drew the conclusion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.