Read the three sections starting from here:
Lightning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's electrons and ions.
Lightning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's electrons and ions.
Did you follow the link SY? 🙂
It is not about lightning, it is about movement of Solar system. 😉
It is not about lightning, it is about movement of Solar system. 😉
Here is something about lightning from NASA, not from Wikipedia: NASA - NASA's Fermi Catches Thunderstorms Hurling Antimatter into Space
Read the three sections starting from here:
Lightning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's electrons and ions.
Someone told me it is antimatter . I am sure that has to be wrong . However .......
Sorry Wave I should have read yours also . Interesting .
A question to SY . I saw the tracer before a lightning strike . Some say other than electrons . I could Google it , any thoughts ?
Love this one .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NH5yK3ZN54&feature=related
🙂 Static and dynamic systems... nice one..Anti matter from a lightning strike?
Regards
M. Gregg
My freind Malcolm is finally buying a computer . He gave me a list of things he would not do . I said don't be daft that's the fun of it . It's TV where we are the stars . He says his e-mail address will be NAP250 , I suspect it's taken ?
Someone said thought is just one of mans waste products .
Someone said thought is just one of mans waste products .
🙂 Static and dynamic systems... nice one..Anti matter from a lightning strike?
What lightning strike? The movie that I see clicking the link is about orbiting of the solar system itself.
NASA - NASA's Fermi Catches Thunderstorms Hurling Antimatter into Space
You posted it.. 🙂
Regards
M. Gregg
You posted it.. 🙂
Regards
M. Gregg
Last edited:
Yes, I did. But did yo follow Nigel's link? SY obviously did not, but he disagrees with it. 😀
Yes, I did. But did yo follow Nigel's link? SY obviously did not, but he disagrees with it. 😀
Yes it puts a different perspective on it...its an interesting idea.
I guess it depends on what angle the system is at with the sun moving.
I guess the sun is moving so the idea of a static system has to be limited.
I find it hard to see how you can disagree its either a spiral or loops..
Regards
M. Gregg
Last edited:
Well they have done it..🙂
BBC News - Paralysed patients control robotic arm with thoughts
Regards
M. Gregg
BBC News - Paralysed patients control robotic arm with thoughts
Regards
M. Gregg
What is anti matter?
Antimatter Academy
Interesting isn't it...😀 (Well I thought so)
Regards
M. Gregg
Antimatter Academy
Interesting isn't it...😀 (Well I thought so)
Regards
M. Gregg
Does anyone know,
Anything about the great attractor?😕
Its mentioned in this link:
ASP: How Fast Are You Moving When You Are Sitting Still?
The Great Attractor
Regards
M. Gregg
Anything about the great attractor?😕
Its mentioned in this link:
ASP: How Fast Are You Moving When You Are Sitting Still?
The Great Attractor
Regards
M. Gregg
I think that might be the Strange attractor also ? Some may remember I said the missing antimatter is pulling us .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
I was saying to my friend if number patterns exist in the Lottery we only see them when it is too late . I said I could much more easily prove the existence of God than what she wanted . She is an atheist so that should have been enough , it wasn't . I asked her to get me to design something useful instead ( not hi fi ) .
Dorking said ( I believe ) certain debates are like playing chess against pigeons . They knock the pieces over s..t on the board and then claim to other pigeons that they won .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
I was saying to my friend if number patterns exist in the Lottery we only see them when it is too late . I said I could much more easily prove the existence of God than what she wanted . She is an atheist so that should have been enough , it wasn't . I asked her to get me to design something useful instead ( not hi fi ) .
Dorking said ( I believe ) certain debates are like playing chess against pigeons . They knock the pieces over s..t on the board and then claim to other pigeons that they won .
Last edited:
Does anyone know,
Anything about the great attractor?😕
Its mentioned in this link:
ASP: How Fast Are You Moving When You Are Sitting Still?
The Great Attractor
Regards
M. Gregg
It's actually irrelevant how fast the earth is moving around whatever system, because it's not accelerating in any meaningful way, which means it's a valid frame of reference for physics, i.e. the earth's movement has no influence on us.
It looks a little unlikely . Dark matter again only more so ?
I saw a You-tube thing talking about Carbon 7 ( secret of secrets ) . As far as I know it doesn't exist . Even 8 is a bit short lived to be of interest .
The only thing I did like is the voice spoke of how the universe was only 2 dimensional at first , time being the second . As it cooled other dimensions emerged . The assertion was a 5 th was emerging now or soon ( no idea if asking ) .
I saw a You-tube thing talking about Carbon 7 ( secret of secrets ) . As far as I know it doesn't exist . Even 8 is a bit short lived to be of interest .
The only thing I did like is the voice spoke of how the universe was only 2 dimensional at first , time being the second . As it cooled other dimensions emerged . The assertion was a 5 th was emerging now or soon ( no idea if asking ) .
It looks a little unlikely . Dark matter again only more so ?
I saw a You-tube thing talking about Carbon 7 ( secret of secrets ) . As far as I know it doesn't exist . Even 8 is a bit short lived to be of interest .
The only thing I did like is the voice spoke of how the universe was only 2 dimensional at first , time being the second . As it cooled other dimensions emerged . The assertion was a 5 th was emerging now or soon ( no idea if asking ) .
Was it like this: (Just reading it )
Once Upon a Time, the Universe Was Really Weird : Discovery News
Regards
M. Gregg
I guess
No really, this is the most basic concept of the theory of relativity, and physics in general.
Consider the following:
You are travelling on the QM2, you're in the middle of the Atlantic and seas are calm. The ship is chugging along at a constant speed of 30 knots.
You and a friend want to play table tennis. The table is oriented so that one side points to the bow, and one to the stern.
Say you're playing from the stern side. When you serve, do you think that you have to take into account that the ship is moving at 30 knots forward, meaning you have to hit the ball harder than you would if you were stationary? No. Conversely, if you play from the bow side, would your serve gain extra speed from the speed the boat already has? Again, the answer is no.
It's the same in physics. If you have a rocketship that moves at near the speed of light, and you microwave your TV dinner, are you worried that the photons will all get dragged to one side of the microwave? I think you can answer that. 😉
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- The speed of light is NOT constant