6N11 spec sheet
http://us.100y.com.tw/pdf_file/6N11.pdf
someone wrote undocumented ecc88 replacement
and this old thread from here popped up
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/88609-6n1-chinese-tube-others.html
http://us.100y.com.tw/pdf_file/6N11.pdf
someone wrote undocumented ecc88 replacement
and this old thread from here popped up
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/88609-6n1-chinese-tube-others.html
A historical fact is that the 6n1(p) was frequently used (in the past) to upgrade the reception in tube radios.
The clue is that 6n1(p) and 6n11 are both "louder" on HF than 6922. So, if you'd like to replace the tube in a made-for-6n11 circuit, without dulling down the treble, then a probable answer is 6n1(p).
The historical radio reception upgrade used 6np1-ev or similar to replace 6922, and for exactly the same reason.
The clue is that 6n1(p) and 6n11 are both "louder" on HF than 6922. So, if you'd like to replace the tube in a made-for-6n11 circuit, without dulling down the treble, then a probable answer is 6n1(p).
The historical radio reception upgrade used 6np1-ev or similar to replace 6922, and for exactly the same reason.
A historical fact is that the 6n1(p) was frequently used (in the past) to upgrade the reception in tube radios.
The clue is that 6n1(p) and 6n11 are both "louder" on HF than 6922. So, if you'd like to replace the tube in a made-for-6n11 circuit, without dulling down the treble, then a probable answer is 6n1(p).
The historical radio reception upgrade used 6np1-ev or similar to replace 6922, and for exactly the same reason.
LMAO
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- 6N11 = 6N1P ?