Anatoliy, I know your English is excellent, so please reread my posts where I said exactly the opposite of what you attribute to me.
Reproduction qualifies as an increase in entropy in my book. For example, think about what happens to your house within 5 minutes after the kids get home from school 😀
It is not enough!
We already exploited Thermodynamics in order to justify destruction of nature; now we have more of engines than needed that waste resources accumulted by self-organizing and self - evolving live nature; now we need to roll back in order to survive, so new laws need to formulated that allow to regenerate and reproduce what we vitally need in order to survive.
Some insight, yes- but NO-ONE has the answer yet. That's why it's fun research. Self-organizing systems are very hot right now (in an interest sense, not temperature). But whatever it is, it's overwhelmingly likely that it will be something physical, not extra-physical.
Every observed biological process has followed well-established laws and principles of physics and chemistry. No exceptions yet, so the odds are that, no matter how interesting the discoveries, their bases will be the same as any other chemical reaction. Biology has been a rich field but nothing discovered there has caused physicists or chemists to go back to the drawing board.
Every observed biological process has followed well-established laws and principles of physics and chemistry. No exceptions yet, so the odds are that, no matter how interesting the discoveries, their bases will be the same as any other chemical reaction. Biology has been a rich field but nothing discovered there has caused physicists or chemists to go back to the drawing board.
OK, so let's exterminate those cable manufacturers who create the myriad of 'information' about their superior sonic qualities in order to justify the outlay. That should cure of at least some of the evils and excesses. You'll excuse me while I go hone my lance?
I'm wondering what new data came out that caused him to announce he is gay.
John
Hmmm, I wondering if coming out of the closet when you're 81 is much of an accomplishment? Did he wait until everybody he knew who would be angry or offended was dead already? 😀
Very good question!
Why some people believe in Lobachevskiy's geometry, but don't believe in repeatable results of experiments?
Probably, because Albert Einstein is an authority, while Dean Raden is not? 😉
I don't see another explanation.
Why some people believe in Lobachevskiy's geometry, but don't believe in repeatable results of experiments?
Probably, because Albert Einstein is an authority, while Dean Raden is not? 😉
I don't see another explanation.
And it works pretty well, too. I'm fortunate to work for one of the best neurobiologists in the world and the stuff he does just astounds me.
Why should quantum phenomena necessarily be important for macro phenomena like the electrochemical process of signal transmisson in neural cells? Are they necessary to explain the function of present computer memory?
Signal transmission of neural cells fall apart when we try to calculate speed needed for mental activity, CNS activity, and so on. Also, cells themselves communicate... And so on.
My point was exactly highlighted by Abraxalito. We live in the society where if facts can't be explained by mainstream schoolbook science that facts as if don't exist. Negative mass hallucinations is a norm in such a case. So journalists when write about something they've discovered in works of scientists try to "prove" facts by fantastic theories making readers laugh; as the results very significant facts described in articles are dismissed by readers, together with theories the journalist used.
It's back to the topic.
So, what do we know about worst assumptions in audio electronics? 😉
I mean, facts. No theories please. 😀
My point was exactly highlighted by Abraxalito. We live in the society where if facts can't be explained by mainstream schoolbook science that facts as if don't exist. Negative mass hallucinations is a norm in such a case. So journalists when write about something they've discovered in works of scientists try to "prove" facts by fantastic theories making readers laugh; as the results very significant facts described in articles are dismissed by readers, together with theories the journalist used.
It's back to the topic.
So, what do we know about worst assumptions in audio electronics? 😉
I mean, facts. No theories please. 😀
The ear has evolved so well because those people who had poor hearing got snuck up on from behind and eaten !
Direction of sound is important too so you know which direction a threat is coming from.
Direction of sound is important too so you know which direction a threat is coming from.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.