Lightspeed Attenuator Sam Tellig Stereophile review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sam Tellig (from Stereophile) bought one of these from me back in August and has made positive mention of it as the "Mystery Preamp" in column "Sam's Space" in the November issue, and the full write up will be in the December issue.
If the write up was as enthusiastic as his email to me about how it sounded back in August, it may inspire those Stereophile devotee's to then make their own Lightspeed Attenuator.

Cheers George
 

Attachments

  • Lightspeed Attenuator MkII Circuit.JPG
    Lightspeed Attenuator MkII Circuit.JPG
    101.2 KB · Views: 1,830
I cannot reprint or quote any part as yet, they don't allow
reviews to be quoted in Stereophile until the issue that follows the one
in which the review is published.
So that means the parts in the December and January, I cannot quote copy or post till at least February. So you'll just have to purchase or read them in the magazine, don't blame them it's taking issue sales away from them if they didn't do this.

Cheers George
 
Lightspeed attenuator

Interesting idea.

A number of years ago I designed an amp for another application that used matched photo-mos couplers. The two couplers in a matched pair were operated in a master/slave servo arrangement that canceled out any nonlinearities in the couplers' transfer function. Using this servo topology it should be possible to slave two or more pairs to a single log taper potentiometer. That would make the choice of the potentiometer easier. Another approach would be to employ a circuit that converts from linear to log and use a linear potentiometer. This could be done either digitally or via analog techniques.

JCM
 
I cannot reprint or quote any part as yet, they don't allow
reviews to be quoted in Stereophile until the issue that follows the one
in which the review is published.
So that means the parts in the December and January, I cannot quote copy or post till at least February. So you'll just have to purchase or read them in the magazine, don't blame them it's taking issue sales away from them if they didn't do this.

Cheers George

Sorry guys false alarm, the main article by Sam Tellig is now postponed till the February issue, too much Xmas cheer over the break maybe.
Cheers George
 
Sam Tellig (from Stereophile) bought one of these from me back in August and has made positive mention of it as the "Mystery Preamp" in column "Sam's Space" in the November issue, and the full write up will be in the December issue.
If the write up was as enthusiastic as his email to me about how it sounded back in August, it may inspire those Stereophile devotee's to then make their own Lightspeed Attenuator.

Cheers George
At a first glance I thought it was about an attenuator of the speed of light 😀
 
Thanks Uriah, I have an issue coming from a friend in Sydney when it arrives, I believe the Halcyon was maybe a MkI configuration as well (still better than any potentiometer) as nothing was matched, that's why he needed left and right volume controls (which are PITA to use) Sam's one died also, should have used Silonex LDR's, but they weren't around back then.
Cheers George
 
Last edited:
George,
You have been so forthcoming with your invention here on DIY Audio I hope the future is extremely good to you with your commercial offerings. The Stereophile writeup is long overdo. Kudos, Damn good work. Thanks for all you have given us to date.
It really is a good attenuator clear, coherent, simple.

Tad
 
Interesting idea.

A number of years ago I designed an amp for another application that used matched photo-mos couplers. The two couplers in a matched pair were operated in a master/slave servo arrangement that canceled out any nonlinearities in the couplers' transfer function. Using this servo topology it should be possible to slave two or more pairs to a single log taper potentiometer. That would make the choice of the potentiometer easier. Another approach would be to employ a circuit that converts from linear to log and use a linear potentiometer. This could be done either digitally or via analog techniques.

JCM
Problem with this type of servo coupler is that they are comparatively slow --
 
Status
Not open for further replies.