Tube testers which is the best? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th August 2006, 11:48 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Default Tube testers which is the best?

Since we here seem to have a love for tubes I'm under the impression that there might be some opinions regarding tube tester performance. Which is best for what we do? Do we absolutely have to own the most expensive brand and model? Is stocking up on various models for future windfall a good idea?

How about a tube tester discussion?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 01:14 PM   #2
amperex is offline amperex  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MI
I like Hickok tube testers from the 1950s on up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 01:21 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Brian Beck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Florida, USA
Default Re: Tube testers which is the best?

First of all, when we say tube “tester” what we really want for DIY is called a tube “analyzer”. The former usually refers to a simple emission tester (go-no go) while “analyzer” refers to a device that measures mutual conductance (now called transconductance or gm) under closer to real operating conditions, as well as measuring many other tube parameters. The former was useful for quickly finding the culprit tube in a broken TV set. The latter is used to more fully characterize a tube’s performance, and can assist in tube matching. That’s what we want for DIY.

Aside from rare and bulky laboratory reference analyzers, what most people seek is a “suitcase” analyzer. Hickok was the dominant brand.

Everyone has his favorite “tester”, probably the one he owns! I have experience with the Hickok 539B/C, the Hickok 752, the Triplett 3444, and the TV-7 military units. I’ve seen the European AVO units, which look retro-cool, but I’ve never played with them. Currently I own a Hickok 752 and a Triplett 3444. I also have a Tektronix 577 for plate curves, but I wouldn’t recommend a curve tracer for most hobbyists until after they’ve got a good suit-case analyzer.

The 539 series is probably the default recommendation in the US. They truly are fine units, and hard to fault as a recommendation. As a result, prices have sky-rocketed. The 752 was the successor to the 539 series, but is not as commonly seen, and is also a good choice. The TV-7 used to be available at hamfests for dirt-cheap prices, but those days are over. I do not recommend it anyway for general DIY use, because it’s not versatile enough. My favorite analyzer is the beautifully designed Triplett 3444 because it measures tubes using a wider range of well-filtered DC plate voltages that give you more real-world testing scenarios. The 3444 also uses a 5 KHz sine wave oscillator as the internal source voltage, rather than relying on half wave 60 Hz derived from the line. It easily performs all the other bells-and-whistles tests, and is a pleasure to use.

Quote:
Originally posted by burnedfingers
Is stocking up on various models for future windfall a good idea?
That day may be here already. EBay prices for tube analyzers are pretty high for the coveted models. I toy with the idea of selling my 752, not because I don’t like, it, but because I never use it since the 3444 does just about everything equally as well or better.
__________________
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 01:56 PM   #4
bembel is offline bembel  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
bembel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Send a message via Yahoo to bembel
Hi, I own an Hickock I-177B from US signal corps and is socket adaptator MX-949 (I fink it was left in europe after WW2, but I'm not sure).
It is a transconductance meter wich, as said Brian, is a better test for us in audio.
I'm very happy with it, it seem very accurate (you need to do a recap-job the beast and verify the balance of rectifier valves (this is an old beast for instance))
Hickock have the reputation to be the tektronix of tube tester and I think you can trust an I-177B on all test (except maybe gas test for small tubes)
There are little problems anyway :
-110V is not convinient nowadays in europe.
-83 mercury rectifier tube is hard to find and needs special care (it's poison), it's a good idea also to let it warm up verticaly as it is not intented for horizontal use (mercury condensation and ZAP)
-tropicalisation smells a lot (maybe you'll get stoned with green spots ;-)
-pinout switching is combination limited (except with MX949 extention)
-It miss post WWII popular tubes like EL34/6CA7 or EL84/6BQ5 ---> data welcome !
-Test for little tubes is performed with Ugk=5V (way too much for me)

Otherwise,to me, the best tube tester for old tubes
I paid it less than €40 with extention (no comment)
__________________
Plus je pédale moins vite, moins j'avance plus vite !
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 02:55 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: VA
I use a Hickok 600A and I am very happy with it as it does a good selection of both older and newer tubes. You still need the optional extension panel to do compactrons, nuvistors etc. I also have a I-177 but its not as good for newer tubes. I am just glad I bought the 600A back in the days when they were $20....

Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 03:11 PM   #6
isaacc7 is offline isaacc7  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DC area
Has anyone tried this analyzer? It look pretty good and can be as flexible as anyone could need I would think...

Isaac
__________________
www.isaharr.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 04:25 PM   #7
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Hi Isaac,
The transcendent Sound tube tester seems like a pretty good possibility.. One of the more interesting features is its ability to test at currents similar to those encountered in the circuits in which they will be used.

I think Hagtech makes or made an interesting tester kit as well.

I would definitely recommend the Hickok 539B/C series testers, and have and regularly use a 539B. I have the last generation charts and was able to get a complete set of manuals for it, although that was so long ago I no longer remember where I got them. I think the 600 series (have I got the model number right??) is also a good bet.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 04:36 PM   #8
isaacc7 is offline isaacc7  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DC area
Quote:
Originally posted by kevinkr
Hi Isaac,
The transcendent Sound tube tester seems like a pretty good possibility.. One of the more interesting features is its ability to test at currents similar to those encountered in the circuits in which they will be used.


Yeah, that's what caught my eye too. Has anyone ever built the RAT tube tester? The thing that appeals to me is the flexibility. If I ever got the motivation, i could build a tester for all those weird, two top cap tubes, 25 and 16 volt tubes, etc. Oh well, what's one more project on my to do list?:-)

Isaac
__________________
www.isaharr.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2006, 06:17 PM   #9
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
Here in Blighty, we like the AVO tester, of which the best is the VCM163 because it applies 15kHz to measure mutual conductance. Prices, however, have gone through the roof - I saw one go recently for £2100. I started wondering whether I really needed mine. I'd prefer a curve tracer...
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2006, 07:12 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Yes I've built the RAT tester as designed by the Steve Bench. I have a collection of testers ( Eico, Heathkit, Mercury, Precision, AVO MKII, AVO CT160, Supreme, Sencore, Taylor and an ancient Confidence tester), the RAT is the easiest to use by far. It does'nt test directly for shorts but if you watch the anode and screen volt meters as you wind up the current, the meters dip if there is some sort of internal short. I had a bunch of meters on hand so instead of calibrated knobs I've added meters for all the readouts. After using it for about 2 yrs I plan to build another incorporating some extra ideas and also things that I should have done first up.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vacuum tube modeling software - beta testers wanted andrei Tubes / Valves 132 27th December 2013 01:16 AM
Tube bias testers, your opinions, please. Nihilist Tubes / Valves 13 9th March 2009 06:37 PM
jackson tube testers dcb50 Swap Meet 0 2nd October 2008 05:18 PM
Best Tube Testers? Zap Tubes / Valves 10 6th March 2008 05:48 PM
Eico Tube Testers for sale. Coulomb Swap Meet 14 11th March 2005 11:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2