|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
You're thinking about something like that.
Last edited by Lazy Cat; 14th August 2011 at 05:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#202 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
Quote:
as the high frequency THD would rise a lot if there s no bufferisation of the VAS, even if it has a relatively high standing current. Also, two pairs would be necessary to have good THD distribution. ![]() That makes a lot in respect of the projected simplicity , but high perfs are not achievable with low component count , unless one use a dedicated high perf IC driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, that looks good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I also thought like Wahab that the Szikley is around the output Fets, so one driver stage more. Yes, this gets us more away from the simplicity of the first version.
|
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
Somewhat like this..
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
OK, that's good.
I know we could easily go to 20 transistors version in a split second, but that maybe will happen in another thread, another time. ![]() So, we have to stay at most 8 transistors only concept, this ensures discrete symmetrical circuit simplicity, on the other hand on us is to find the best sch configuration within these limits for the best performance. It sounds like a challange to me.
Last edited by Lazy Cat; 14th August 2011 at 06:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
#208 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
Quote:
but in all cases , this is possible only with additionnal components...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I would then turn around the Fets ( post 205 ) but that may create oscillation problems.
|
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: algeria/france
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Symetrical schematics are alike plague in Brazil, do you like them? | destroyer X | Solid State | 151 | 1st July 2010 02:09 PM |
| Symetrical out low Zout | karsten21 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 1st February 2010 10:19 PM |
| going balanced/symetrical - what benefits? | weissi | Solid State | 15 | 20th October 2007 08:06 AM |
| Symetrical field, is this? | Raka | Multi-Way | 6 | 14th September 2003 01:21 PM |
| Non-symetrical SMPS output | cm961 | Parts | 4 | 21st August 2003 10:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |