HOLMImpulse: Measuring Frequency & Impulse Response

Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Bug or feature?
In the recent versions of HOLM it seems difficult to get a good plot if the sweep starts above ~20Hz. The bottom end of the plot never looks right.

For example if the sweep is started at 250Hz for a midrange horn, the graph under 250 never looks right, either in gated or total response mode. Even with a high pass applied after the measurement. The graph is flat or even rising toward the low end.

In earlier versions this seemed to be no problem. Is there a new setting to make this work? Or is there a change?
 
It's a new bug

Bug or feature?
In the recent versions of HOLM it seems difficult to get a good plot if the sweep starts above ~20Hz. The bottom end of the plot never looks right.
In earlier versions this seemed to be no problem. Is there a new setting to make this work? Or is there a change?

It's a new bug - thanks for reporting:up:

(The signal most be highpassed, but the feature as attached is not working)
 

Attachments

  • ScreenShot001.png
    ScreenShot001.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 415
Hi askbojensen and thanks for the software! I'm probably moving from ARTA to HOLMImpulse soon.

One feature request: Support for multichannel devices ie. have the option of selecting which input and output channels are used for measurements. I use the EMU 0404 USB which features 2 channels of analog inputs and outputs and 2 channels of digital S/PDIF inputs and outputs. The digital channels are available as channels 3 and 4 through ASIO and DirectSound. While the digital input is less useful, the output would have been used in many occasions if common measurement software supported multichannel (I know ARTA doesn't).
 
Supporting more channels

...I use the EMU 0404 USB which features 2 channels of analog inputs and outputs and 2 channels of digital S/PDIF inputs and outputs. The digital channels are available as channels 3 and 4 through ASIO and DirectSound. While the digital input is less useful, the output would have been used in many occasions if common measurement software supported multichannel (I know ARTA doesn't).

I use the EMU 0404 USB myself :) And need more channels to

I'm working on it - rewriting my wrapper layer to PortAudio - A VU-Meter will also come soon.
 
New Release 1.4.0.4 (bugfixes + features)

Tried that, it does not work well here. Seems the same problem on measurements I take and ones that a friend sends me. Is there some test I can try to verify?

Please try again with this new version

New Release 1.4.0.4 (bugfixes + features)
http://www.holmacoustics.com/downloads/HOLMImpulse/ChangeLog.txt

Version 1.4.0.4 (2009-09-23)

Features/Changes:
* Record Meter (Alt+F1)
* Supporting 4 channels soundcards
* Seperating MME, DirectSound, ASIO

Bugfixes:
* High ressult when using logsweep or chirp
* Time-zero Auto detect
* Memory Allocation error for low- & high-pass

-----------------------------
Comments
The record meter can help you adjust the volume - Now I guess we need a sound generator (pink noise) while adjusting volume in the windows mixer or the soundcard hardware
 

Attachments

  • ScreenShot004.png
    ScreenShot004.png
    29.3 KB · Views: 362
Version 1.4.0.4 is supporting more channels

The digital channels are available as channels 3 and 4 through ASIO and DirectSound. While the digital input is less useful, the output would have been used in many occasions if common measurement software supported multichannel (I know ARTA doesn't).

I managed to get my USB EMU 0404 make a digital loopback - could though only measure at 88.2 kHz and 96 kHz - and only using ASIO
 
Nice meter! Would it be possible to have i selectable to linear for greater accuracy?
Recording meters are usually linear for that reason.

I am looking at the EMU0404 USB, is it something you recommend?

Dual channel measurement would be cool.

Thanks again for making an excellent tool even better. Soon there will be nothing HOLMImpulse can't do.
 
The USB EMU 0404

Nice meter! Would it be possible to have i selectable to linear for greater accuracy?
Recording meters are usually linear for that reason.

I am looking at the EMU0404 USB, is it something you recommend?

Dual channel measurement would be cool.

Thanks again for making an excellent tool even better. Soon there will be nothing HOLMImpulse can't do.

EMU 0404
I like it - cheap compared to performance price here: http://www.thomann.de/gb/emu_0404_usb.htm

Advantages (I have found):
- The phontom works acoording to 48 V specs (Not all soundcard does that...)
- Can work as a DAC/ADC without PC
- Bit perfect with lock on clok (internal/external)
- Works with MME/DirectSound/ASIO
- Low noise
- Solid box
- External PSU
- Many samplerates and dedicated clocks (192 kHz and 176.4 kHz)

Disadvantages (I have found):
- Very hard to get all channels/samplerates working on Linux
- Digital in/out only working with ASIO channel 3,4
- External PSU (When doing field recordings)
- The USB 2.0 cable can only be 1-2 meter
 
Linear recording meter?

Nice meter! Would it be possible to have i selectable to linear for greater accuracy?
Recording meters are usually linear for that reason.
HOLMImpulse can't do.

Well you are not able to see the noise floor at eg. -60 dB = 0.01 = 1% using a linear recording meter... If you adjust the minimum to - 20 dB you will have the same accuracy. I guess what you want is a aboslute scale depending on your hardware - we need a pistonphone abolute callibration of the microphone.
(Or a voltage meter calllibration when measuring electric signals)