Please simulate my headphone amp

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Could someone kindly run a simulation on my modified class A headphone amp regarding its performance such as distortion, slew rate, band width, etc.

With my old HP distortion analyser I cannot measure any distortion at 200kHz becuase its residual distortion seems higher than this amp. Can anyone help?

The supply is ±15V. The input is 250 mV and provides 2V output into 50 Ω. and the pot is set to give an output off-set around 40µV.



Kindest regards

Nico
 

Attachments

  • hp_amp.jpg
    hp_amp.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 1,480
Disabled Account
Joined 2007
Very nice! Very good performance. I measured distortion at less than 0.0009% at 1KHz and 0.001 at 20KHz.

Stability can be improved by increasing C3 from 15p to 100p. This is demonstrated in the graphic below. Top chart is the Miller cap at 15p, the bottom at 100p. Signal is taken from the base of the EF (Q3).
 

Attachments

  • nha.gif
    nha.gif
    16.9 KB · Views: 1,130
MJL21193 said:
Very nice! Very good performance. I measured distortion at less than 0.0009% at 1KHz and 0.001 at 20KHz.

Stability can be improved by increasing C3 from 15p to 100p. This is demonstrated in the graphic below. Top chart is the Miller cap at 15p, the bottom at 100p. Signal is taken from the base of the EF (Q3).


Hi can you show results with C3 = 100p, I think it will cause oscilation at about 5 MHz. Check bandwidth and see if there are spikes high up.

Maybe after a few more improvements, do you think we should do a PCB?

Kind regards

Nico
 
MJL21193 said:
Very nice! Very good performance. I measured distortion at less than 0.0009% at 1KHz and 0.001 at 20KHz.

Stability can be improved by increasing C3 from 15p to 100p. This is demonstrated in the graphic below. Top chart is the Miller cap at 15p, the bottom at 100p. Signal is taken from the base of the EF (Q3).

C3 = 100p is acceptable, no nasties higher up.

Limits the bandwidth and has smooth high side roll-off just above 1 MHz on my spectrum analyser/tracking gen. Still cannot see any distortion on the audio analyser.

Nice improvement, what else have you in mind.
 
Netlist said:
I just realized that others can do a far better job than me so I'll watch from a distance. :)

/Hugo


I have just downloaded MicroCAP9 demo from http://www.spectrum-soft.com/index.shtm. Now this is not a computer game like these free packages on offer!

Simulated the circuit and my goodness, voltages and currents predicted by the package is identical to the prototype I made. Thanks guys for helping me.

I am so impressed with the simulation package that I have ordered the full version at only $ 4630, it is a steal.
 
MJL21193 said:
Very nice! Very good performance. I measured distortion at less than 0.0009% at 1KHz and 0.001 at 20KHz.

Stability can be improved by increasing C3 from 15p to 100p. This is demonstrated in the graphic below. Top chart is the Miller cap at 15p, the bottom at 100p. Signal is taken from the base of the EF (Q3).


It would appear as if c3 = 15p is optimal and 100pF causes slew limiting. With 15p I get about 20V/uS
 
jaycee said:
There's nothing wrong with LTSpice but you will have to dig up your own models. Avoid OnSemi's ones, the Fairchild ones are spot on.

MacroCap uses models with .lib extension which is available from On-Semi and contains 30 parameters used by the program.

As for building ones own libraries, unfortuinately I don't have the time to create models or test each transistor I purchase against the data sheet, that is why I am prepared to pay $ 4K for a simulator and whatever else each library costs.

I accept that On-Semi or any other manufaturer for that matter provides accurate data, else we will not be purchasing their products and they will cease to exist.

Kind regards

Nico
 
peranders said:
My recommendation is not to simulate too much. Why don't you build a prototype?

I have, I am listening to it now. Did some measurements last night - could not believe the measurements and the reason for my wanting to simulate it to confirm.

My audio measurement equipment is pretty old I have an HP8903B and I could not measure any distortion.

I never really simulate much did so when I was still in R&D some years ago. Regarding my hobby, I am from the old school and design from first priciples.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.