Question for Dr. Geddes about his WG foam plug - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th October 2008, 01:05 AM   #1
NV&H is offline NV&H  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Default Question for Dr. Geddes about his WG foam plug

I've read on your website a brief description and purpose of the open cell foam that you use in your wave guides. I'm looking for a little more information.

Are the foam cells random in size/distribution or are they ordered in such a way as to scatter (or perhaps absorb?) sound at certain angles to combat unwanted reflections and NOT scatter at other, more favorable, angles?

Is this discussed in any of your publications? I'm on the verge of buying your waveguide book. If this is discussed there, just might push me over the edge :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008, 02:05 PM   #2
gedlee is offline gedlee  United States
diyAudio Member
gedlee's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
There is no published information on the foam plugs and my book pre-dates its use.

Basically the pores in the foam are a random distribution of sizes arround a certain porosity usually defined as PPI or Pores Per Inch. I use 30 PPI, but it ranges from about 10 to about 100. The pores are indeed random as far as the wavefront is concerned so there is no "spectral" diffraction effect like you are talking about. There is some viscous loss in the material, but it is really pretty low, especially at LFs. If you hold a piece of it up to your ear it is very difficult to hear any effect. It is also difficult to measure its effect, but there are some results posted on my web site in one of the ALMA papers.

Its an interesting phenomina that something that has such a small measureable effect can have such a pronounced audible effect. This has interested me for years and I have some ideas, some of which we have published (also on my web site) and some which I have not talked about in public yet. But I am convinced that this fundamental lack of obvious correlation between the objective effects and the subjective ones is going to be a key issue for loudspeaker design in the future.
Earl Geddes Gedlee Website
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speaker damping: Foam or expanding foam akunec Multi-Way 4 11th February 2014 01:14 AM
Question on mounting Geddes' Waveguides. JoshK Multi-Way 26 27th February 2009 06:24 PM
Foam, thicker foam or Open Cell qguy Subwoofers 4 11th March 2007 07:06 PM
Noob question: What's the foam inside the sub's do? Prismatic Subwoofers 1 30th June 2006 03:14 AM
Phase plug question mrfeedback Multi-Way 4 2nd May 2002 01:41 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2