|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
I recently replaced my SS amp with a tube based amp. I currently have 12 gauge stranded copper wire as my speaker wire. Is CAT5 only recommended when the amp is solid state? I have plenty of that stuff laying around being involved with computers at work. Another thing I wanted to mention which goes back to my amateur radio days is that I remember reading about something called the 'skin effect' when using single conductor wire. It stated that as the frequency increased the current flow tended to travel along the outside of the conductor thereby increasing impedance. I know it was a concern with RF but is it a concern with audio?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
how you assemble your CAT5 wires into a speaker lead will determine the capacitance and inductance of your cables. These two characteristics must be compatible with the amplifier. It does not matter whether it is SS or valve. Compatability is paramount.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Skin effect isn't relevant at audio frequencies.
I used to use cat5, but short runs to horns. I've seem some SS amps go into apoplexy when connected with multiple braided runs where the capacitance is high. Andrew is correct when he said compatability is paramount. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I've made my own Cat5, using 3 strands per side. I braided them together, and then seperated the colored and striped wires to + and -. Banana plugs on the amp end, and heat shrink at both ends to keep it from unraveling.
The run is approximately 12ft in length, and I've had no problems at all with my Super T-Amp. In fact, the gain in quality was considerable, and everyone who passes through my office is amazed as well. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I happilly use a single pair of strands with my tube amps.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
This going to sound stupid but I don't know how to assemble banana plugs. signed, tired of messing with screw terminals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
I've seen some examples on the web where people have tied together massive bundles of Cat5 wire - yet other people are using just a single twisted pair of wires...
Are there any rules of thumb for determining what is best used and when? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Nothing hard & fast. Depends on the speaker and amplifier, and what you're trying to achieve. As a basic ROT, if running a lowish Q driver, the higher the ouput impedence (damping factor) of the amplifier, then thinner wire will probably work better. But that's not hard & fast, as you can also use thin wire with low DF units too.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Huge bundles of cat 5 are popular because the cable is cheap and people think that if a little bit is good then a lot must be better. It's a good way to destroy an unstable amplifier. Braided cat5 is effectively two conductors with very large surface areas very close together separated by an insulator. It's a capacitor.
Look at it this way. Your speaker is usually 8 ohms. 24 AWG wire is 0.03 ohms per foot. Assume your speaker cables are 10 feet long, so the resistance of the whole cable (from amp to speaker and back) is 0.6 ohms. You lose just under 10% of your signal, sounds like a lot. 10% is less than 0.5dB. That $25 per metre enormous monster cable conducts less than 10% better than 24c per metre cat 5 for short runs of cable It's not unusual to have a 0.5dB error in a typical consumer product's volume control between channels. Most people wouldn't even notice such an error. Depending on the particular driver / cabinet combination that little loss of signal (and damping factor) can actually sound better than a huge cable.
__________________
Help some guys with funny hair bang two rocks together really hard. http://athome.web.cern.ch/athome/LHCathome/whatis.html |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
and that extra resistance is just enough to push a speaker that was verging towards boomy into very pronounced boom. Take care with longer speaker leads. My solution: Keep them short to very short. reduces inductance reduces capacitance reduces resistance reduces interference.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Questions about making Cat5 speaker cable | wixy | Everything Else | 1 | 10th March 2007 07:57 AM |
| DVI video cable using CAT5 wire? | montreal | Digital Source | 0 | 7th September 2006 06:20 AM |
| What speaker cable for Class-T amps, Cat5 | MrDodo | Class D | 12 | 8th December 2005 11:44 PM |
| Cat5 speaker cables, my amp doesn't like them | DragonMaster | Everything Else | 19 | 5th December 2005 12:42 AM |
| Cool speaker cables, the famous CAT5 | promitheus | Multi-Way | 4 | 25th May 2001 01:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11126 seconds (76.29% PHP - 23.71% MySQL) with 11 queries |