|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm also working on this project. The board layouts are almost finished...
Main board: ![]() Class D amp boards (left) and PSU drive board (right): ![]() This is essentially an UcD-based self-oscillating stereo amplifier with a built-in unregulated push-pull power supply. It's also the first time that I'm going to use SMD. The power supply is intentionally weak because I wanted a very compact amplifier and class D circuits actually draw very little current when playing music so a huge PSU is not required at all. Main board measures just 127mm by 100mm and total height is going to be 50mm including heatsink and case. Heatsink is going to be made of thick aluminium sheet because of the small amount of heat produced. The power supply control board includes under-voltage and over-heating shutdown logic. It also includes a "fault" latching shutdown mode for output DC protection (not yet implemented). The amplifier boards include true self-oscillating current limiting. There is a third pre-amplifier board that is not yet designed and that is supposed to contain input filters, gain/volume control and the DC protection. More to come...
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Quote:
Nice job though.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Avesnes/Helpe
|
Super EVA !
Looking forward to hear more about it... Also working on D-AMP not ucd but crystal controlled (see my thread) D-Amp is back ! nice job you're doing in this forum ! |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Avesnes/Helpe
|
Super EVA !
Looking forward to hear more about it... Also working on D-AMP not ucd but crystal controlled (see my thread) D-Amp is back ! nice job you're doing in this forum ! your power supply xfrmr is driven by only 2 fets isn't it ? isn't it a bit under rated for a 12V SMPS ? 300W of audio power means at least 350-400W power supply...so 30-35 A @12V |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
"300W" of full-range audio translate into 60W (or so) average power consumption on class D. Note that the push-pull MOSFETs are going to be IRFZ48V with 0.010 typ. Rds-on and the gates are going to be driven with 18V even during lo-bat conditions, so the transformer is actually going to suffer more than the MOSFETs...
In the first prototype of the 230V to 14.4V 72A power supply for car-audio shows that I built, I was using just a pair of IRFZ48V as synchronous rectifiers for 72A continuous output (50A rms on each device) and they never blew. The gates were also driven with 18V and there was a fan keeping them cool.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
does driving a mosfet gate to 18V rather than 12V give a big difference in RDS on?
would it be worth the effort? I'm planning on rebuilding my amp8 push pull SMPS (12V to +/-65V, amp is class T driving into 4ohm bridged) to get less output voltage sag at high powers. I'm presently using two 2" dia transformers, 14pcs IRFZ44 fets on primary side and four 75A ixys rectifiers on secondary side (forgot the part number, I'm already losing 2-3V in each of those. )sorry for the off topic.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi
The thing is that you will have 18v all the time, if you do what she did, even if Vbat is low, say 8V |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Input voltage to the PSU will usually sag during bass transients, and you usually lose 2V in the gate driver. There are also voltage drops across the PCB ground tracks and across the own source leg and bonding wires of the MOSFETs. Sometimes you may end up with less than 8V internally at the gates during maximum current consumption periods if you don't do anything about that. Switching times depend on Vgs too, and I prefer to have things more under control.
Having a high voltage at the gates is more advantageous for some MOSFETs than for others, but you may easily achieve 30% lower Rds-on when you need it.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Krasnogorsk-city
|
Hi, Eva!
Good work ![]() My i ask you one question, did you use discrete or IC comparator in UcD modulator? Best regards, Oleg. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For this first prototype I wanted a quick and simple solution because it's actually going to be mounted in a motorbike and it should be already finished, so I used a LM311 comparator and a IR2010 driver. Any usual class-AB car amplifier would just not fit in a motorbike because they are big, they produce lots of heat and they are current hungry. The main goal is not very low THD but high space and energy efficiency.
I know that propagation delay and dead time are not optimum this way, but since each modulator and gate driver is contained entirely in a daughter board, I can improve it later and swap boards. The headers contain all the required signals.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cool and small 2x150W class D full-range car amplifier | Eva | Car Audio | 0 | 13th November 2007 12:15 AM |
| Full range class D amplifier | MOER | Class D | 2 | 13th May 2005 09:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13623 seconds (72.32% PHP - 27.68% MySQL) with 11 queries |