tuba vs taphorn?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi bjorno,

Like always: nice work! I like your comments and hints.

As to the tapped horn: I prefer the 4 section over the 3 section simulation, it makes it a lot easier to level out the peaks and valleys in the passband, also, keeping the L12 dimension as short as possible has a tendency to clean up the impulse response

I don't think that you need much more equalization and filtering with a tapped horn than with any other vented enclosure. This is probably a gross simplification, but they all unload below the passband, and they all have audible artifacts above the passband that should be filtered out. In practice this doesn't seem to be a major problem at home volume levels (below house wrecking).

In the end the room is going to be the real problem.

Regards,


is this... your final answer? ;)
 
19Ov.2 Double Fold

Hi nephylum,

I modified an old drawing that uses the double fold tapped horn. This should give you an idea if you want to go any further with the 19Ov.2 (size and all...). Let me know if you want to build something like this, and need the internal dimensions.

Regards,
 

Attachments

  • ED_19Ov2_1.pdf
    29.8 KB · Views: 158
Here's a box using the Lab12 GenII from Eminence. There have been at least 5 of these made including this beaut by Tony.
 

Attachments

  • Tony.jpg
    Tony.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 322
  • chris.gif
    chris.gif
    31 KB · Views: 336
than guys for all the help.... hows th's cover higher bass frequency's? just to give an idea... tune to 2:17 of this song. will the th cover this well?


YouTube - KoRn - Predictable with Lyrics
i think i hear some 150~200 hz upper notes in that base.
the th only does ~2 octaves,so it depends on how its tuned.
do you want to use it as a basgitar amp,or as a sub part of a system?
,so it depends on what you want.
 
19Ov.2 - 18" - T/S

Hi guys,

I just got the value for the Le for this speaker from Elemental Designs, they seem to be very friendly and helpful, when their email doesn't crash. The other T/S parameters are reportedly up-to-date.

Elemental Designs Audio 19Ov.2: Le=3.1mH

For those who like to simulate. :)

Regards,
 
Thanks, not good, but better than the 4 mH I assumed.

GM

Hi, I used 5 mH for my best TH shot,but hesitated until now to post..
Here is a comparison for a TH that IMO will have good SQ if XO:ed
at 80 Hz and one other earlier suggested by Qliver that I rek.
to XO at 60 Hz or below if ever built.

PS: Listen to the attached *.wav files and compare.

b:)
 

Attachments

  • 1-TB-TH_vs_b-TH.JPG
    1-TB-TH_vs_b-TH.JPG
    540.6 KB · Views: 284
  • 2-Critical band below 100Hz.JPG
    2-Critical band below 100Hz.JPG
    316.2 KB · Views: 346
  • 3-tb46neph-ALL.JPG
    3-tb46neph-ALL.JPG
    415.7 KB · Views: 242
  • 4-tb46neph-ALL-24dB-at-80Hz.JPG
    4-tb46neph-ALL-24dB-at-80Hz.JPG
    966.4 KB · Views: 217
  • 5-ALL-pre-post_and_AllF-All-F-AllpF.zip
    66 KB · Views: 32
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.