And look up the history of Gore Inc. They invented the expanded Teflon for kidney machines and then discovered what a great dialectic it was.
SY can speak to this authoritatively, but I don't think you get HCN (there would be a whole lot of dead people if you did!). Some Carbon Tetrafluoride is mentioned on one site as a consequence of overheating (but they misspell -fluoride, which does not add confidence). Then there is Perfluorooctanoic acid, which is used in the manufacture of Teflon but Dupont insists you get much more of it from other sources than your nonstick cookware.
Last edited:
It would also involve transmutation since there's no nitrogen in PTFE. It does give off toxic fumes when overheated, but not cyanide.
So called Kremlin Tablet, or Sibirium was designed in our laboratory. The lady who lead the project sat in the same room where I designed my microwave alarm system (Doppler-based miniature radar).
Sibirium - ATK Medical
Initially she wanted to use Teflon (Russian name Ftoroplast-IV), but her medical co-authors from Tomsk State University Clinic denied that. The explanation was, it produced Fosgen, a lethal gas that was used in military mass-murder bombs. I don't know how it could produce anything in human digestion system where temperature can't reach 260 degrees C, but the fact is that when heated it indeed produces lethal gas. Knowing that I never used Teflon pottery.
By the way, I am still wandering, if that pills are disposable, or can be reused.
Probably, for Soviet high-ranked officials they were disposable: they did not count money, the same way as military. But is there a demand for such pills for ordinary people?
Sibirium - ATK Medical
Initially she wanted to use Teflon (Russian name Ftoroplast-IV), but her medical co-authors from Tomsk State University Clinic denied that. The explanation was, it produced Fosgen, a lethal gas that was used in military mass-murder bombs. I don't know how it could produce anything in human digestion system where temperature can't reach 260 degrees C, but the fact is that when heated it indeed produces lethal gas. Knowing that I never used Teflon pottery.
By the way, I am still wandering, if that pills are disposable, or can be reused.
Probably, for Soviet high-ranked officials they were disposable: they did not count money, the same way as military. But is there a demand for such pills for ordinary people?
The 10,000 degree thing as well. If you wanted to resist that temperature (which is way off for a re-entry temperature), you wouldn't even think about a polymer- that exceeds any carbon-carbon bond energy.
Well if that's an alternate spelling for phosgene, we're back in the transmutation biz again, in this case needing chlorine
...would also require elements to transmute. I'm doubting that.
Now let's talk about Tang.
...would also require elements to transmute. I'm doubting that.
We did not know then that the device had being designed for Kremlin Elders who had digestive problems, but I believe medical doctors who participated in the project knew that, so any precautions were valid.
Plenty of chlorine acid in the stomach, no?Well if that's an alternate spelling for phosgene, we're back in the transmutation biz again, in this case needing chlorine
Last edited:
Yes, I bought some pottery that is made of multiple layers of stainless steel and one layer of porous Titanium.
Edit: Oops, I misunderstood your question, I thought you were asking about alternatives...
Last edited:
1. There is a demand for, (that is, sales of), treatments and cures that are supplied.
2. There is a desire for treatments and cures that do not exist. But since these things do not exist, there is no demand for, (sales of), them.
3. In the light of 1. and 2. it's possibly reasonable to think a new anti-cancer product will generate demand (sales), if supplied.
The work was not really to create the vision, more rather to uncover it. It was a discovery rather than an invention. There's plenty more 'work' to be done but I prefer to call it fun to be had.
Yep, but then you rather go on to say that you've been down the road yourself. Which from the way you describe the marketing process it does rather seem that you haven't. You described (not in the post I'm replying to here, but in an earlier one) the traditional marketing 'push' process. I'm relying on marketing pull. Huge difference in approach, chalk vs cheese. The debate over whether supply creates demand or the other way around an important aspect of that difference - highlighted by Wavebourn's mentioning about the Walkman.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.