Offline full-bridge SMPS… need help

Hi all,

I am building a 4kW hard switching full-bridge SMPS for 230VAC (400VDC) that will drive 8xHGTG7N60A4D IGBTs at 100kHz.
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/fairchild/HGTP7N60A4D.pdf

I've never built SMPS at this caliber thus I'd ask some advices what category of flyback diodes would be optimal for this application? I'm also having issues with space within the box and on the large heatsink so I prefer radial diodes.

The IGBTs are going to be driven by 2xIR2110. Is that ok or shall I use more advanced gate drivers that can be mounted on heatsink?

Many thanks

Kind Regards
Tony
 
Last edited:
The IGBTs are going to be driven by 2xIR2110. Is that ok or shall I use more advanced gate drivers that can be mounted on heatsink?

Should be no problem power-wise.
Switching 2x40nC at 15V VGE at fsw=100kHz correspond to 0.12W of losses per an IGBT gate. This losses are spread between gate resistors and a gate driver, the higher the gate resistors, the less stress to the IR2110's.
 
Am I ok with 50ohm gate resistors at each gate?

Agh, the same old good question... and there is no simple answer.
If you understand the switching losses mechanisms, like plain transition losses, diode reverse recovery losses and current tail losses you'll definitely determine the right value youself by looking at your 'scope. If you don't want to go too deep than the thermometer on heatsinks is your friend here.

If I were in your shoes, I'd stay with 25 ohms cited in the datasheet for the start, the IGBT datasheets are generous enough to directly show switching energies (Eon, Eoff).
All you have to do to estimate switching losses is scale them (linearly) to your VCE and IC values and multiply them with switching frequency.
 

Attachments

  • offline bottom.png
    offline bottom.png
    78 KB · Views: 1,038
  • 6524815663_3c27496bfd_m.jpg
    6524815663_3c27496bfd_m.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 517
  • 6524839577_bb80aa8c11_m.jpg
    6524839577_bb80aa8c11_m.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 339
  • 6524840295_993afaff32_m.jpg
    6524840295_993afaff32_m.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 950
  • offline halfbridge high power pcb artwork s .zip
    458.4 KB · Views: 505
  • offline art work.zip
    611.7 KB · Views: 541
  • offline halfbridge high power schema values.pdf
    30.9 KB · Views: 630
  • offline top.png
    offline top.png
    71.7 KB · Views: 985
  • offline schema.png
    offline schema.png
    31.7 KB · Views: 1,005
  • offline components.png
    offline components.png
    54 KB · Views: 1,002
Last edited:
more photos
 

Attachments

  • 6524815663_3c27496bfd_m.jpg
    6524815663_3c27496bfd_m.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 248
  • 6524828343_2dd46c3e04_m.jpg
    6524828343_2dd46c3e04_m.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 163
  • 6524830575_c3aa97452a_m.jpg
    6524830575_c3aa97452a_m.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 138
  • 6524833639_6c7f6d7f38_m.jpg
    6524833639_6c7f6d7f38_m.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 146
  • 6524838919_5dc91df3bd_m.jpg
    6524838919_5dc91df3bd_m.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 148
  • 6524841719_daab087ba2_m.jpg
    6524841719_daab087ba2_m.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 151
  • 6524835073_4ec67138cd_m.jpg
    6524835073_4ec67138cd_m.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 235
  • 6524841023_8bd777e7a5_m.jpg
    6524841023_8bd777e7a5_m.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 237
  • 6524840295_993afaff32_m.jpg
    6524840295_993afaff32_m.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 483
  • 6524823533_906b6e1860_m.jpg
    6524823533_906b6e1860_m.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 245
Last edited:
:cheers::cheers: :D thanks njec car ,luka, eva , mzzj ,n channel chas 1, xclipse, and every one who participated on this forum . though most parts i recycled from old parts of scrap machines due to lack of availability of parts. the circuit is working fine. GOD bless you all for your efforts.

a link to photos

Flickr: stevekamala's Photostream

Flickr: stevekamala's Photostream
 
Last edited:
one question, why did you place fets like you did, and use wire to connect them, while they are on heatsink, like you show on the picture?
And I see you have double sided pcb, that should be easy to connect them via pcb... this part I don't like too much, and I hope you will explain why you did this

Edit: not fets, but output diodes
 
Last edited:
Good job Steven!

@luka, it appears to me it was easier to solve the mechanical mounting of the heatsink horizontally. It also looks like it was his first project so I wouldn't measure it with very strict engineers' eyes. ;) For a hobbist it is a prime job with CAD work, etching, etc, not to mention he used surplus parts.

So I would say Steven: thumbs up mate. :)
 
I can't remeber what was the performance of Stewin's PSU, but as for the core he used I presume it is above 70W, which means here in the EU the PFC would be mandatory for that PSU. I don't know the regulations in the US though but PFC is always recommended so IMHO it always worths the hassle.

As for the 110V, if you're lazy you can simply half the number of primary turns and adjust the frequency if necessary (and mind the core and FET temperatures!). Although I would strongly suggest using a transformer calculator to find the correct values.
 
SAFeTY

:cheers::cheers: :D thanks njec car ,luka, eva , mzzj ,n channel chas 1, xclipse, and every one who participated on this forum . though most parts i recycled from old parts of scrap machines due to lack of availability of parts. the circuit is working fine. GOD bless you all for your efforts.

a link to photos

Flickr: stevekamala's Photostream

Flickr: stevekamala's Photostream

Looks like you spent good time designing your SMPS, But seems to me it suffers badly from safety issues, witch visually didn't pass for me.

Like, but not limited to creepage distances, Isolation, etc..

Good Luck