My Le Cleac'h horn build

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Here is the 320hz horn, Eg @ 2.83, second one Eg @ 0
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_14 Mar. 25 17.22.gif
    ScreenHunter_14 Mar. 25 17.22.gif
    24.3 KB · Views: 991
  • ScreenHunter_15 Mar. 25 17.22.gif
    ScreenHunter_15 Mar. 25 17.22.gif
    22.8 KB · Views: 972
Change to .5pi and T= 0.8.

Looks ugly still this is 0 degrees off axis and 20 off
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_20 Mar. 25 20.35.gif
    ScreenHunter_20 Mar. 25 20.35.gif
    23.2 KB · Views: 103
  • ScreenHunter_21 Mar. 25 20.36.gif
    ScreenHunter_21 Mar. 25 20.36.gif
    28.3 KB · Views: 81
  • ScreenHunter_22 Mar. 25 20.41.gif
    ScreenHunter_22 Mar. 25 20.41.gif
    24.4 KB · Views: 102
  • ScreenHunter_24 Mar. 25 20.44.gif
    ScreenHunter_24 Mar. 25 20.44.gif
    23.4 KB · Views: 91
Last edited:
Here is the beamwidth for the 320hz horn and the 1000hz horn, then a combined one.

The 320 goes vertically up. Can you help me understand what I am seeing please?
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_29 Mar. 25 21.33.gif
    ScreenHunter_29 Mar. 25 21.33.gif
    24.3 KB · Views: 97
  • ScreenHunter_28 Mar. 25 21.33.gif
    ScreenHunter_28 Mar. 25 21.33.gif
    24.2 KB · Views: 89
  • ScreenHunter_27 Mar. 25 21.32.gif
    ScreenHunter_27 Mar. 25 21.32.gif
    23.3 KB · Views: 77
Hello,

(Sorry to take the thread so late, I just come back from 1 week geological trip).

As it has been often said by David McBean himself, the directivity behaviour provided by Hornresp is just a rough evaluation.

The reason is because the hypothesis of a flat piston source is considered. As David used to say a BEM simulation will give more consistent results.

When we use a TD2001 on an axisymetrical and when we compare the prediction from Hornresp with real measurements we can see that the frequency response on axis extends flat at very high frequencies (wharever the cut-off of the horn). Then when we study directivity we can see that the real mesurements shows less beaming at high frequency than predicted (this lead me to think that the wavefront at the output of the TD2001 comrpession driver is more like a spherical cap ( = a dome)..

Best regards from Paris, France

Jean-Michel Le Cléac'h
 
Thankyou Jean-Michel for joning the thread.

In your opinion what size horn would suit above the 180hz Le Cleac'h. This will have a Radian 950pb in it and run from 300hz up. I am open to wether a ET 703 tweeter is used as well as the TD2001, I am unsure as more is better but am heading in the direction of a TD2001 in a 350 or 400hz horn, then a et703 above.
 
Hey 3GGG
I'm still wondering what you're going to do for bass, since this looks like it's heading towards a five-way to my mind . You've got yourself better integration from lower-mids to treble by using the 950pb, but what's going to happen when you cross to a big fluffy bass driver that can handle 45 to 300Hz ?

;o)

MJ
 
Hello 3GGG,

I ... am heading in the direction of a TD2001 in a 350 or 400hz horn, then a et703 above.

This is a good idea IMHO. You should be using the 350 and 400Hz horn above 1500Hz and the ET703 above 8kHz.

But if you are listening at a sweet spot you should also try the 180Hz alone in a fist step, that's means the 180Hz free to reproduce the HF, with eventually a bit of HF equalization as in:

http://www.azurahorn.com/6681_on_160.pdf

Best regards from Paris, France

Jean-Michel Le Cléac'h
 
I am still looking around for ideas, got any? The idea of a 3 to 4 metre horn with a fold in it to make it 2 metres

No need to make it 3-4m. With the right driver, 15", low compression a 35Hz does not need to be more than 2,5-3mm. My concrete horn built standing against the rear wall is below 2,80m. Just a small folding at the bottom. Footprint is only 100*60cm.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.