Hello.
This is not a best topic for this question but I know that here are right people present.
Ray: I heard from Brent that you might have analog filter component values for fitting the discrete output stage to CD-17 KI. I have this discrete output stage now on CD67SE and I might be moving those to CD-17 MK2 KI. Brent told that some mods might be needed.
Ps. I couldn't find Ray's email address anywhere and I have not made enough post to forum to send private email. Sorry.
Mikko, from Finland
This is not a best topic for this question but I know that here are right people present.
Ray: I heard from Brent that you might have analog filter component values for fitting the discrete output stage to CD-17 KI. I have this discrete output stage now on CD67SE and I might be moving those to CD-17 MK2 KI. Brent told that some mods might be needed.
Ps. I couldn't find Ray's email address anywhere and I have not made enough post to forum to send private email. Sorry.
Mikko, from Finland
Re: Direct from the horse's mouth .......
Yes, I did, in fact, I'm using it now to drive my cans. Pretty fast beast.
poynton said:.
.
.
.
Anyone tried the current fedback chip ??
Andy
( from somewhere in the Indian Ocean....again )
Yes, I did, in fact, I'm using it now to drive my cans. Pretty fast beast.
Re: Re: Direct from the horse's mouth .......
Metal can or on brown dogs?
avr300 said:
Yes, I did, in fact, I'm using it now to drive my cans. Pretty fast beast.
Metal can or on brown dogs?
UV101 said:I'm sure Ray will see your post however....
You could go to the first post on this thread, its got email and www for Ray.
Hello!
SimontY said:They look as good as they sound
Mikko H. said:Hello.
This is not a best topic for this question but I know that here are right people present.
Ray: I heard from Brent that you might have analog filter component values for fitting the discrete output stage to CD-17 KI. I have this discrete output stage now on CD67SE and I might be moving those to CD-17 MK2 KI. Brent told that some mods might be needed.
Ps. I couldn't find Ray's email address anywhere and I have not made enough post to forum to send private email. Sorry.
Mikko, from Finland
According to the manual the CD17mkII uses the TDA1547 Bitstream DAC, which is a bit more complicated. Is has a switched capacitor network inside that needs to be buffered. Loading it directly with the DOS' passive filter will cause problems. So what you could try is use one dual opamp per channel for buffering (DON'T use the internal ones, they're rubbish!) and place a DOS after that. Well, you could leave the first stage intact and place the DOS directly after that for quick results, but I read somewhere that some idiot put a few NE5532 in there, so....
The DOS' 3rd order filter, as it is now, should work fine for the CD17. You may have to adjust the amplification a bit by altering the emitter resistors, but that's not very difficult.
Regards,
Ray
Re: Cans
Could not help myself.... just love my metal can in the 101b
6h5c said:A spacy picture...
Could not help myself.... just love my metal can in the 101b
Thanks Ray !
My problem with your email is this:
"vBulletin vBulletin Message
Sorry but you cannot currently send emails to other members because your account is under moderation. If you are a new user, you will gain full member status after you have made a few posts."
What a rookie I am here. It seems that I spend too little time on this topic. This will change...
Br, Mikko
My problem with your email is this:
"vBulletin vBulletin Message
Sorry but you cannot currently send emails to other members because your account is under moderation. If you are a new user, you will gain full member status after you have made a few posts."
What a rookie I am here. It seems that I spend too little time on this topic. This will change...
Br, Mikko
Mikko H. said:Thanks Ray !
My problem with your email is this:
"vBulletin vBulletin Message
Sorry but you cannot currently send emails to other members because your account is under moderation. If you are a new user, you will gain full member status after you have made a few posts."
What a rookie I am here. It seems that I spend too little time on this topic. This will change...
Br, Mikko
No problem, i'm still keeping an eye on this thread
Ray
Re: Cans
So Whats the difference between the 49710 and the 49720?
The other thread was talking about trying LME49713 current feedback device
6h5c said:A spacy picture...
So Whats the difference between the 49710 and the 49720?
The other thread was talking about trying LME49713 current feedback device
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- Marantz CD63 & CD67 mods list