John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier

Status
Not open for further replies.
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Joshua_G said:



That's interesting. Do you have any working suggestion for a circuit that "translates resistance, spring and mass in R, C and L and kicks back to the amp"?


Joshua,

You have the habit to always come back with questions that can easily be found with a little bit of self-effort. Look up 'loudspeaker models'.

Jan Didden
 
john curl said:
Noise adds up as the square root of sum of the individual noise units squared. This is where the square root comes from.


Speaking about low noise: John, your Vendetta SCP-2 MC is now history :D

With the attached MC input stage I got 0.3nV/rtHz using regular K170BL/J74BL with Idss=11+/-0.5mA and 0.25nV/rtHz with selected (for noise) devices. It is also rock solid stable.

The complete MC uses a few more high voltage opamps (OPA552), has servo (OPA445, hence no film or electrolytic caps in the signal path, except for decouplings and the output optional 10uF polypropylene). 28dB headroom (+/-24V supplies, +/-16V for the input stage), 64dB gain, 0.01% distortion mostly 2nd harmonic, RIAA better than +/-0.1dB.

All the above measured and consistently confirmed. BTW, it's a dual mono construction hosted (preliminary) in a single 6 x 6 x 2 inch 0.1" aluminum case with two magnetically shielded 25VA toroids on board. 108dB channel separation, if somebody cares about.

It's part of HPS 3.0 soon to be finished and posted in the HPS thread. Don't worry, it sounds amazing even with that much feedback.

I'm not planning to get into business and sell this stuff so your old SCP-2 record is safe from a commercial perspective :D

Next, down to under 0.2nV/rtHz with BF862, SMD parts (including inductors), etc... Hard to find good SMD parts (in particular resistors), but not impossible.

input_stage.JPG
 
Your next step should be to replace the monolithic 797 op-amp with a discrete high performance op-amp. May I suggest the Forssell 993...Its all FET, runs on up to 24 volt rails, and sounds terrific. I know what the 797 sounds like, as well as a lot of other op-amps. The only monolithic op-amp I can even tolerate are the new LM4562 family in the metal can...and most of the discrete op-amps on the market, largely unknown to the home audio world, and well known in the pro audio and recording world, sound better than the best of the monolithics.

As John has said, you have done pretty well on this from the look of it. Have you actually measured the noise figure from a functioning amplifier, or just Spiced it?

Just for fun....Here are some links to the discrete op-amp world...
I have tried most of what is out there, and find the Forssell 993 to be my favorite of the current commercial offerings. It is all FET. I'm working on a hybred J-FET/BJT design of my own, but I'm not ready to chat about it yet, still working out topology variations, like whether to go with Diamond output or conventional complimentary PP topology.

Fred Forssell 993, but also check out the 992....
http://www.forsselltech.com/main.shtml
http://www.forsselltech.com/jfet993.shtml
http://www.forsselltech.com/downloa...estData/jfet993_specificationsAndTestData.pdf

Great River publishes a schematic of their op-amp...
http://recording.org/users/kev/Great River Opamp2.pdf

The John Hardy version of the bipolar 990
http://www.johnhardyco.com/pdf/990.pdf a complete chat with schematic and applications

API clone pages
http://web.qx.net/jgreenlee/

Anyway, this is just a start....Discrete op-amps should have their own pages on DIY...I have not looked, there might be! Aside from some discussion of theory, I'm not sure that they really fit on the blowtorch thread, as most applications of any op-amp are based on making use of feedback, but then again, a lot off nearly off topic, and way off topic stuff ends up here anyway....

Woof!


Cheers
 
Bob Cordell said:



Hi Joshua,

No. Otala's method for measuring IIM involves feeding a large 60 Hz signal into the output of the amplifier under test through a resistor, like 8 ohms. I just followed Otala's test approach. I don't know of an IIM test that would employ a loudspeaker in place of the resistor in the Otala IIM test.

Cheers,
Bob


Okay, Otala's method for measuring IIM doesn't include a real speaker, or an emulation of it.
Do you think that better real-world results will be obtained by using a real speaker, or an emulation of it?
 
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Joshua_G said:



Okay, Otala's method for measuring IIM doesn't include a real speaker, or an emulation of it.
Do you think that better real-world results will be obtained by using a real speaker, or an emulation of it?


Joshua,

This test feeds the 60Hz test signal in *series* with an 8 ohms resistor into the amp output. It is a specific protocol to measure IIM and compare different amps. As such, it doesn't have a direct relation to a real speaker.

If you want I can send you some literature on this, I think I have something in my library.

Edit: The attached is the way Jean Hiraga did this test. It looks like I was wrong, he does include either an 8 ohms load or speaker load, and feeds the test signal through 250 ohms. In a perfect amp you would only see the 1kHz at the output, not the 50 (or 60) Hz external signal.
But this may be a slightly different test than Bob alluded to.

Jan Didden
 

Attachments

  • noname1.jpg
    noname1.jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 944
Status
Not open for further replies.