John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I read that even the earth rotation / length of day has 1/f.

The ever rising noise density is no problem because of the ever falling
bandwidth over which it applies.
That the earth's rotation wanders with 1/f is interesting/curious.

Until recently I lived over the road and dunes from the local beach...Indian Ocean, nothing to intercept for a few thousand kilometres.
At night the suburb was silent, except for the surf sound.
The usual surf sound was white/pink noise in nature, but every now and then unusual waves would break on the shore.
These rare large magnitude waves would break on the beach and cause a colossal deep bass sound that shook the house and grounds.
I now live 1000m from a different beach, and sometimes in the silence of night similar big bass events occur and are readily audible from this distance.
I find this randomness very satisfying to live with....much nicer than constant level/spectrum man made cityscape sounds/noises.

Afaik there is no proper explanation for 1/f noise/randomness in systems of all kinds.
Is it possible that we are at the mercy of an 'aether' field noise influence that pervades the universe ?.

Dan.
 
Last edited:
Afaik there is no proper explanation for 1/f noise/randomness in systems of all kinds.
Is it possible that we are at the mercy of an 'aether' field noise influence that pervades the universe ?.

Dan.

There is some very good literature out there I'll see If I can find you a free link. In fact many physical processes are documented to have ~1/f noise behavior at low frequencies. One reference I have is probably too obscure to find easily, W. H. Press Comments in Astrophysics 7 (1978).

On waves, there has been recent interest in rogue waves observed from satellite, possibly wind driven solitons.

EDIT - forgot this one. Dan I think you will like his final conclusions. http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0204/0204033.pdf
 
Last edited:
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
The only matched P/N channel low noise Jfet I could find is U440/441.
Dual monolithic is the only way to go (to keep it simple).

Still ,Jfet's are hard to source ... I tried mosfet P/N pairs. Real good (below) :) .
They are so easy to find - 20 different choices of both P-channel/N-channel
in matched dual SMD.
DIY'ers lose patience when they can't source (or have to buy a hundred
to test/match).

The reason for my latest "kick" here is that my amp far exceeds my
sources now. Must correct this. Many good -115db attenuators (pga2311).
They only drive 600R loads , but with 2ppm/20K. Need a buffer !
Add a DAC , most of the PGA2311 kits have a extra input just for this.

So , DAC/ 3 more inputs (remote control) and a buffer that can drive
any amp (or headphones).

"GD circuit" - I come up with lots of grateful dead (but no circuit).

OS


I`ve made solid state line amplifier that is not symmetrical, it`s a simple solid state SE preamp, it measures just like triode but with lower distortion and it sounds as a best triode stages, but have low output impedance.

Symmetric gain stages are just more complex and they cancel, better sounding, even harmonics, and do nothing to odd. That is not a way to a good sounding gear, odd harmonics are dominating never mind if they are low... and yes SE could cancel even harmonics that`s why I don`t use conventional op amp like design :spin:
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
That article is helpful, but still vague. It says that about 50V over the rated voltage will cause problems. Does that mean a 5V lytic will withstand 50V? I've destroyed some lytics with never as much as 50V overvoltage.

No it doesnt mean that.

Just dont over voltage the cap using DC+AC (ripple) max rating.

Surge and over-voltage for the audiophile could be an issue this way ---->

Take a single tube stage (SE) with a cap connected to the plate -a coupling cap to next stage - when power is turned on the full supply B+ voltage is on the cap until the filament heats up enough for the tube to begin to conduct..... at which time the voltage to the cap becomes much less on the plate.

maybe not the best example... but all i can think of at the moment: If you used a B+ of 400v and the fully heated, conducting plate voltage is 200V, you could choose a 200VDC rated part with a surge rating of 400v. Myself, I would forget the surge rating and use a more expensive 400vdc rated cap.

Any condition which causes the cap voltage to temporarily be higher than normal conditions would/could make use of the surge rating.


THx-RNMarsh
 
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
indeed.
one's first "cap confetti shower" is a rite of passage.
:)

mlloyd1
I have stories. At one point, accustomed to the very high quality of Rubycon parts in the day, I did walk too close to the edge of the parapet, and had 16V parts running at a loosely regulated 18V. All was well until purchasing couldn't get the Rubys for a few days, and wound up with a dirt-floor vendor's parts. Some were even leaking electrolyte already. Some had their sleeves reversed---those of course blew up promptly! But this was occurring in Mexico, at a subcontractor's factory.

Some of the powered speakers shipped, and some failed via exploding lytics within about 30 minutes.:eek:

Rather than throw the purchasing agent under the bus in accordance with principles of what some regard to be de rigueur in modern business, I took the bullet for a design mistake---which of course it was, even if there had never been a failure with the intended manufacturer.

I still have a pair of the speakers with the crappy caps, as those that survived for a while tended to just get better---for how long who knows. They are still on, though I don't use them frequently, so the ambient temp in the right channel box is moderate. It's been about twenty years now.

Brad
 
Member
Joined 2002
Paid Member
OT

Ed, Tom
These are good news for you.
Think of testing, monitoring/auto adjusting your working fields using such wireless sensors (downgraded and less expensive compared to the airborne types)


FLITE-WISE set out to develop a wireless sensor system to which acoustic and pressure sensors may be connected (with openness to other types of sensors), which is able to operate airborne for continuous flight test measurements. This translated into two use cases.
The first is a fully-integrated wireless sensor node dedicated to acoustic measurements along the fuselage of an aircraft. It is a circular, flexible patch designed to be applied to the aircraft skin and consisting of a sensor node packaged such that it can sustain the harsh environmental conditions of test flights. With its maximum thickness of less than 3 mm, it accommodates one acoustic sensor, communication capability, storage and energy for a 12-hour campaign. It is powered by ultra-thin batteries which can be wirelessly recharged by inductive coupling, making it possible to sample frequencies of up to 50 KHz with a maximum time-stamping error between two nodes of below 50 μs.

"When do you expect your technology to be commercialised?"
Given the application industry, aeronautics, in which development and certification cycles are between 5 and 10 years long, the technology will be available commercially in 2 or 3 years.

"What are the next steps for the project, and do you have any follow-up plans after its end?"
The technology has to pass the flight tests with the help of the topic manager Airbus Operation. This is planned for 2015. The prototypes will then be industrialised, to be manufactured in serial production. The technology will also be further developed for improved performances in terms of sampling rate and bandwidth as well as jamming protection.


Read more at: Wireless sensors make aircraft maintenance more efficient
European Commission : CORDIS : Projects and Results : FLite Instrumentation TEst WIreless SEnsor

George
 
Last edited:
Because we don't know how to measure the music and our pleasure, and not even what exactly means our traditional measurements VS what we can hear or not (ears + brain), the only serious way to use our measurement instruments is to use them to help-us, while we design, to go in the right direction, and some numbers as minimal threshold.
Because this hi-fi game is a make believe one, you have to rely on your own ears to figure out how good this illusion works for you.
It is like this. You have to be a scientist while you design, and an artist while you judge the quality of the devices you will use or produce.
Any position witch is not balanced between the two is, omho, just stupid.
In fact it is more straightforward than that - competent audio is pleasurable, but the techniques for measuring the competence are currently poor, our ears are quite superior as measuring devices in key areas at the moment.

Down the track, hopefully, a little more intelligence, less ego driven, will finally begin to break through, and more solid progress in coming to grips with what's needed to always be able to engineer subjectively high quality audio will occur.
 
Last edited:
What? ... more intelligence, less ego, subjectively high quality ... or all of the above ...? :D

It certainly can be done ... I've had enough good experiences, coming across top notch sound reinforcement, to know that a few people at least can put it together, whether through technical competence, or intuition, or combinations of such. The aim is, for that standard to be the standard - not just be like a lucky win in the lottery ... :).
 
I`ve made solid state line amplifier that is not symmetrical, it`s a simple solid state SE preamp, it measures just like triode but with lower distortion and it sounds as a best triode stages, but have low output impedance.

Symmetric gain stages are just more complex and they cancel, better sounding, even harmonics, and do nothing to odd. That is not a way to a good sounding gear, odd harmonics are dominating never mind if they are low... and yes SE could cancel even harmonics that`s why I don`t use conventional op amp like design :spin:

I noticed the sim showing much more even cancellation.

So , what you are saying is that a blowtorch like topology has
inferior SQ ?

My observation , is at those levels ... how you would not hear any
harmonics.

OS
 
Actually, quality parts already have a built in safety margin. They can work at SLIGHTLY larger voltages than specified, but doing so does incur risk; just nice to know they can take some overstepping the line voltages.

I once tried running some German caps from Fisher & Tausche, Roe(derstein) and Simens Sikorel at 66V rather than 63V as marked, and nothing happened, nothing blew, nothing started bloating. But that was quite a few years ago, and I'm not sure the current models could do it all over again. But remember, when a big cap blows, it will mostly do so on top where it's supposed to blow, but every now and then it might go off with a bang. I still have some fine scars on my left hand when one did go off because I switched its polarities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.