How low do the speakers in a home theatre need to go really? Should we not focus on dynamics?

Member
Joined 2005
Paid Member
Recently watched a movie with my daughter- Kung Fu Panda 4 at our local cinema. We were 2/3 towards the rear and in the centre. Most of the dialogue was jumping around ~75dB at our listening positioning. Quiet scenes were few and far between in this kids action movie, but got just below 60dB. During the explosive action scenes SPL pipped just over 105dB on few occasions.

This was screenshot during music at the end credits:

IMG_0750.png

This coincides with my preference for movies at home. Adjust for clear dialogue ~70dB at MLP
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Recently watched a movie with my daughter- Kung Fu Panda 4 at our local cinema. We were 2/3 towards the rear and in the centre. Most of the dialogue was jumping around ~75dB at our listening positioning. Quiet scenes were few and far between in this kids action movie, but got just below 60dB. During the explosive action scenes SPL pipped just over 105dB on few occasions.

This was screenshot during music at the end credits:

View attachment 1298736

This coincides with my preference for movies at home. Adjust for clear dialogue ~70dB at MLP
Do you have this measurement saved? What's peak level?
What you describe is EXACTLY ATMOS reference level! 30dB for speech to explosion is a little more as I expected but 75dBSpl for speech is already relatively loud, I stay with 65-70dBSpl at home for dialog.

100-105dBSpl for an explosion is not really that loud - when the speakers can do it with low THD. That's very different to listen to music with 100dBSpl, which is about "normal" concert level. We can take loud, short events pretty good, but 100dBSPL for an hour needs earplugs.

Thanks for your measurement - will have a look into SPL Pro!
 
My daughters want me to dual purpose 'our🙂' listening room to include cinema!

I like getting away from the screen, but a large screen would fit nicely on the front wall behind the SH50s I made.
They do voice etc just fine centred nicely, so centre speaker not really necessary.
Couple of smaller rears and we'd be there.

The 2 tapped horn subs and the 2 SH50s provide all the dynamics you could wish for..

Only concern is how to get the DSP'd crossovered SH50s and subs integrated with the rears.

Is there a DSP capable preamp / 5.1 unit or something that could split off the 5.1 to my existing DSP 2 channel system?
Subs would be a problem there though?

Would also need to work as a hifi 2 channel 4 / 5 way set up?

That's my conundrum.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for all the helpful replies, this post was a bit of a sanity check on my part; having seen the home theatre market dominated by speakers on the wrong side of the size-LF extension-efficiency trade-off.

It begs the question though, why are there not more low bandwidth, high-efficiency mains focused at the home theatre market? Too niche? Lack of consumer knowledge, driving them toward the current mainstream options?

I think you can build a relatively compact, visually appealing speaker that follows this philosophy.

These mains are exactly the kind of thing I was thinking of, although for my purposes, maybe even a little more compact.
The mains in that image are compact and the typical French Fry two way…….if there’s a compression driver in those, the efficiency is wasted on a 6.5” midwoofer……..add a second midwoofer in an MTM and now you’ve got my attention.

Is this system going behind an acoustically transparent screen too?…….if not, what size screen and what size feature wall?
 
Thank you for all the helpful replies, this post was a bit of a sanity check on my part; having seen the home theatre market dominated by speakers on the wrong side of the size-LF extension-efficiency trade-off.

It begs the question though, why are there not more low bandwidth, high-efficiency mains focused at the home theatre market? Too niche? Lack of consumer knowledge, driving them toward the current mainstream options?

I think you can build a relatively compact, visually appealing speaker that follows this philosophy.

Hello

The higher efficiency you go the larger the box to maintain LF extension. Check out Hoffmans Iron Law. You have sensitivity, enclosure size and bass extension. You can only have 2 never all 3. Not many can tolerate larger speakers unless they have a more or less dedicated room.

Rob :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef...nnot all,would compromise the third parameter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hello

The higher efficiency you go the larger the box to maintain LF extension. Check out Hoffmans Iron Law. You have sensitivity, enclosure size and bass extension. You can only have 2 never all 3. Not many can tolerate larger speakers unless they have a more or less dedicated room.

Rob :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef...nnot all,would compromise the third parameter.
This I can confirm. My 105Db efficient speakers extend the bass frequencies to 23Hz, but they're 24" wide, x 24" deep, by 47" tall. They command a tremendous presence in the living room of my 1600 sf condo. Fortunately, my s/o likes music almost as much as I do and has been rather supportive of my hobby, although I have noticed a few subtle barbs here and there.
 
The mains in that image are compact and the typical French Fry two way…….if there’s a compression driver in those, the efficiency is wasted on a 6.5” midwoofer……..
It's an 8" lower midrange driver with 92dB sensitivity. As it is close a wall and doesn't need to support low frequencies you get more sensitivity as with big HiFi Speakers (think of 8" midrange speakers). But for a bigger room you would need to use a 2nd 8", that's for sure.

And the next picture is with the screen ... I don't understand that question?
 
Last edited:
Hello

The higher efficiency you go the larger the box to maintain LF extension. Check out Hoffmans Iron Law. You have sensitivity, enclosure size and bass extension. You can only have 2 never all 3. Not many can tolerate larger speakers unless they have a more or less dedicated room.
That's exactly what you can do in a cinema system. You don't need bass extension when your woofer system covers 20-100Hz. You still need sensitivity and 8-10" drivers but tailored to 80Hz upwards. As the speaker will be hidden behind screens or acoustic fabrics anyways size of the speakers is not the problem. You need space for woofers anyways and to get there for cinema you have to think differently as with music alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That's exactly what you can do in a cinema system. You don't need bass extension when your woofer system covers 20-100Hz. You still need sensitivity and 8-10" drivers but tailored to 80Hz upwards. As the speaker will be hidden behind screens or acoustic fabrics anyways size of the speakers is not the problem. You need space for woofers anyways and to get there for cinema you have to think differently as with music alone.

Not sure what you are saying? Bass extension typically means digging lower. From 20-100 Hz you can go low with either big boxes or small. With small you loose sensitivity. Even for the 10's the same law applies over their bandwidth.

Rob :)
 
Dunno, no experience with either, but FYI/FWIW you can research movies and from sad/painful/expensive experience the depth charges in the movie U-571 @ reference was too much VLF vibration for my cheaply built floating floor, stick built house.

Smart move, all my HIFI systems have been prosound simply because 'way back when' the affordable amps were limited to < 10 W and as recordings became wider range in both BW and dynamic headroom, saw no point in going backwards by switching to ever higher power amps, though even with prosound drivers, best IME to use Class A/B amps to get the best overall performance from any speaker.

Yeah, I’ve never been drawn to outright dynamics or SPL, but I like efficiency. I moved away from HT about 15 years ago and now focus on quality two-channel. Even through that, there are several movies that go from 50dB dialog to 103dB dynamics, I think I mentioned it in recent years and it’s too much for my ears.

As far as the system, everything has been updated except the speakers, with that being the last build to complete it. I created that thread some time ago looking for recommendations for a 94dB 15” woofer, so I think you may have been among those helping in that search. Might have to go down to 12” or isobaric in order to get the cabinet size under control.

The floors in my house are poured concrete over compacted sand and gravel. I love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Not sure what you are saying? Bass extension typically means digging lower. From 20-100 Hz you can go low with either big boxes or small. With small you loose sensitivity. Even for the 10's the same law applies over their bandwidth.

Rob :)
It's like a PA system. Your woofer plays the low frequencies. Your main system only goes down to 80-100Hz and can be "small".
No need for the main system to go down to 20Hz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
My daughters want me to dual purpose 'our🙂' listening room to include cinema!

I like getting away from the screen, but a large screen would fit nicely on the front wall behind the SH50s I made.
They do voice etc just fine centred nicely, so centre speaker not really necessary.
Couple of smaller rears and we'd be there.

The 2 tapped horn subs and the 2 SH50s provide all the dynamics you could wish for..

Only concern is how to get the DSP'd crossovered SH50s and subs integrated with the rears.

Is there a DSP capable preamp / 5.1 unit or something that could split off the 5.1 to my existing DSP 2 channel system?
Subs would be a problem there though?

Would also need to work as a hifi 2 channel 4 / 5 way set up?

That's my conundrum.
Marantz Cinema 70 AVR will provide the necessary preamp outputs to break out your active left and right channels as well as the subs.

MiniDSP Flex 8 HT can do this too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Marantz Cinema 70 AVR
Thanks. Good to get some recommendations. I'll check it out.

I looked at the Denon x2700h?

Heard of Flex 8 but not a HT version.
Much lighter on the inputs than the other receiver, but covers the ones I'd use.
One box solution should sound the best.

If only my Najda DSP didn't sound so good and so easy to use / flexible.
My next DSP would need full FIR capability for hifi, I think.

I'll just switch the tapped horn subs between HIfi amp and surround amp. Good quality 4 pole switches should do it.

I'm assuming the delays I use for phase coherent alignment will not get in the way of screen / lip syncing?
 
I'm assuming the delays I use for phase coherent alignment will not get in the way of screen / lip syncing?
IIRC, you were using ~24ms delay (about double that which was actually needed for time alignment of your tops to the subs...).
The visual image should then be leading the sound by that amount, similar to sitting in the 8th row of a theater, or watching someone talk from 27 feet (8.3meters) away.

With video streaming, sometimes the image lags behind the sound, totally unnatural in the real world, and I find it messes with understanding dialog, makes it hard to lip read ;) .

Regarding your 4 pole switch, it should be a “break before make” type (break connection to one amp before making a connection to the other amp) and switch all four connections (no common ground) to prevent both amps from being connected to each other for a split second, which could trigger protection circuits or fry outputs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Thanks. Good to get some recommendations. I'll check it out.

I looked at the Denon x2700h?
Look for the 3700H, it has a lot more valueable features and, most important, pre-amp outputs. Since the 3800H is out, you may get it heavily discounted, about the price of the Maranz. Which is no bad AVR at all. The Denon is just a little more "beef" and less "life style" optics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
IIRC, you were using ~24ms delay (about double that which was actually needed for time alignment of your tops to the subs...).
The visual image should then be leading the sound by that amount, similar to sitting in the 8th row of a theater, or watching someone talk from 27 feet (8.3meters) away.
Thanks Art.

As I work through this I think the only was will be for the the AV receiver to feed either the subs at speaker volume or feed the big amp I use at line.
That way the AV receiver can take care of the sync with subs and rears and eventual centre.
A feed to Najda DSP XO etc for the SH50s only. Najda can have no or as little delay from HF driver and MF / LF as required, to be as close as possible.

Btw my tapped horn subs do a great job at cinema.
I played some sound tracks, effects, explosions etc Shock and awe.
These will quite happily make the air around you oscillate at 18Hz on stuff like Felix Hell's Organ Sensation, so I know there'd be okay.
The drivers are Eminence Kappa Pro LFIIs.
I will just tickling them.
 
Steve,

In the old days I recall AV amps being able to route the sub ( .1) output to the main L/R speakers. Not sure if modern amps still have that option but it would mean you would not have to swap the Tapped subs between systems. Set the front left / rights to large , route the subwoofer channel to mains and then use the av amps speaker distance settings to allow for the mains speakers (najda ) delay by setting the front left right speaker distance closer than they really are. Other option set the surrounds a lot bigger distance away to delay them to match.

Hope that made some sense.

Rob.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user