HAL PREAMPLIFIERS

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Harrison, instead consider the Linkwitz Railey bass equalisation circuit matched to the loudspeaker. I think you will derive a lot more pleasure from this configuration. It is on the ESP website plus explanation and calculator.

Happy new year Nico,

Thanks for refreshing me. Very nice read. Had looked at it some years back. A refresh is always good. .

The solution is aimed at a sealed enclosure and does not feature adjustment. Imagine what would happen in the case where the recording is compensated for that some how. That would make for a very boomy listen.

Tell me more about your experiences. I haven't tried it out but will sometime.

kind regards,

Harrison.
 
Hi Nico,

It is hard to guess or predict how several filters/circuits will sound like, or by how much each filter needs to be adjusted to "create" the right effect.
Do you use filters on your products ? ;) Also in your opinion are filters hifi ? What would a RAS preamp be like ;)

Harrison, your ideas has probably done its rounds many million times over with everyone capable of adjusting his system to suit his tastes since audio/electrics first started.

The weirdest of all is today you will modify your system to perfection that solves all your musical pleasures and needs and tomorrow you don't like what you hear and then you want to go back a step, but back to what, the one that you replaced the current configuration with?
The wheel has been re invented many times over the course of human existence Although I wonder what happen to the technical know how of the pyramids ?
When you have an adjustable system like it was a few decades ago, you could satisfy your needs from day to day and always enjoy what you hear. IMO you are doing the music lover's thing, but you probably disappoint the purist audiophile exceeding the requirement of a power switch.

What is it that we want to hear ? Are we ready to listen to what others have crafted ? I guess when we pursue THD we are trying to preserve what others crafted.

kind regards,

Harrison.
 
No purists would agree with me but one modifies the signal to make it "better sounding" or "more pleasing".

I do not know of anyone trying to make a system sound worse.

There is not a soul on this earth that can say a system sounds like the real thing unless he can A/B switch between the live performance with that being reproduced on his hi-fi system (which of course is quite impossible).

Each person would modify the system to satisfy his/her taste and mind that it sounds "original like or better than original", by tweaking, adjusting or whatever it takes.

If you can convince others that your blend results in the right flavour, then you on the way of creating a following and you can commercialise your product.

Harrison, I do not for a moment believe that on this forum or anywhere else is a single designer that has found a universal flavour or that his/her product is the best sounding although many will try and put this argument forward.

Just think how universal a simple wrist watch is, but there remains thousands of manufacturers all claiming something special about their time piece, however, time remains time.

Hi Nico,

The other day there was a timely posting in the forum that had a preamp that is quite interesting and follows some of my philosophies :) . There is no shame in acknowledging another mans work. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/66036-creek-cas-4040-amp-schematic-2.html . Attached is my explanation.

kind regards,

Harrison.
 

Attachments

  • creekpre.png
    creekpre.png
    73.2 KB · Views: 230
I use a linkwitz railey derivative EQ on the input of my pre-amp. Then I pass it though a 1 watt class A amplifier, it is followed by the master volume control then three passive eight order elliptical filters to split the frequency band to each speaker driver fed by its own amplifier with 24 step attenuator on each channel.

I further drive four additional full range speakers from a further stereo amp, but at lower level than the main speakers. Two of these are "bookshelf" type size and two are midrange/hf horns.

There is absolutely nothing that I do that would impress the audiophile at all. However, every music lover/professional that has ever visited had a problem dragging him/herself away from listening to music, whether it is oldies, trance, jazz, pop, world.... I have collected some six thousand albums over the years and can please almost every musical taste.

The fact that you show your equaliser setting boosting low bass, means that your are trying to achieve exactly what the linkwitz railey LF equaliser suggests.

Over many years of developing both amps and speakers, I came to the conclusion three years ago indicating that anything I do to try to improve on my current system is several steps backwards.

I have kept an open mind to amplifier design and performance and have built many of those suggested in these threads, but I only compare these using headphones, which is my other listening hobby.
 
Hi Nico,

Nice response. Is it possible that there are some forms of distortion that are necessary to make sound more acceptable to our ears ? Would his explain why a set of people will seek out tube preamplifier s to 'sweeten' the signal.

In your setup, the combined delays and phase shifts may actually produce something. Are the full ranges pumping in an error correcting signal ?

Does your system have that velvet effect ? The effect that makes a visitor to your house to seek out where that music is coming from and they don't wanna leave ?

Would the same effect be achieved with less ?

How fast are your amplifiers ?

Any hints on THD ?

kind regards,

Harrison.
 
Hi Harrison,

My amps are all very fast, very low THD and quite high power, though my listening level is moderate. Speakers are set all in front of the listener in a typical stereo configuration...... a picture is simpler.:rolleyes:

Black amp is 4 channels and the two side amps are 2-channel total of 8 amplifiers. All amplifiers are identical circuits.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00392.JPG
    DSC00392.JPG
    600.9 KB · Views: 167
Over the weekend I was A/B comparing a couple of studio monitors at the local sound shop among them, Yamaha HS80M, AdamAX7, KRK Rokit 8, JBL LSR 2300. One of the sound engineers preferred the Yamaha as it sounded like a custom job someone had done for him at his studio. I did also notice how it brought out the vocals. The second sound engineer preferred the Adam and talked about quality and the price tag reflecting that quality another observer agreed with him. I said that the JBL and the KRK brought out the piano and sounded easier on the ears. We didn't reach an agreement. I also did not check how they had configured the switches behind these reference monitors.

If all the filters and bass boost were replaced with a Baxandall tone control how would it sound ?

I also wonder how would a Baxandall tone control rate against the B5 ?

kind regards,

Harrison.
 
Hi all,

What sounds better ?

1. Using an electronic crossover as part of the preamp
2. Using a passive 12dB crossover speaker side

What is the actual effect of crossovers on our ears ? Does something special happen to the way our ears perceive music when the low frequency is separated from high frequency content ?
 
hi Harisson,

I do like your intentions of creating a preamp which is universal for all different kinds of music.I do love to listen to music and I will surely enjoy it especially if it minimize my standing and going back and forth to my equiptment just to suit my taste.

I do like tone controls only two potentiometer covers all the frequency .that's why I hate equalizer.and a multiple crossover for high ,mid and lows and to feed to multiple amps surely I would enjoy listening if my electric bills were to keep as low as possible.

I only use active crossover if my set is for large crowd because crossover network of speakers are useless when amp is driven at high volume.crossover network inside my speaker is enough for my home use.

regards.
drowranger
 
Passive or active cross-over. Although filters changes signal phase, amplitude and impedance I would argue that passive at the speaker end would sound different from active filters before amplification because and amplifier output impedance at least remains more constant and relatively low than that of a passive filter at the speaker element.

I prefer the sound of an active filter multiway speaker, but it is my perception of what I think it should sound like, some would say passive sounds better - I don't believe there is better, only different and the listener makes a choice based on his illusion.
 
Hi Drow,

I guess we can keep the preamp as simple as possible. Just having the tone control and gain block. If an electronic crossover is used then it should be fed from the preamp. If a passive network is used....that's speaker side.

About your experience with passive crossovers is it that the voice coils heat up and mess the crossover frequencies ? There is a link I like to forward to sound engineers, I hope you dont mind :) Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

kind regards

Harrison.
 
Harison, you will get phase shift, but I do not think that is the problem. The change in passive filter impedance will have an effect on the response of the drive element. The active filter provided same form and function in my opinion will sound better controlled than the passive type.

I find that high order elliptical filters seem to do a better job because of a very high roll-off rate almost a brick wall and phase linearity in the pass-band, you can decide on the amount of passband ripple.

Maybe others have other experiences.

When it comes to safety of the drivers, then a passive filter cries king. If it is active system and you accidentally connect the woofer amp to the tweeter, it is history. At least this cannot happen to passive systems.
 
Hi all,

What sounds better ?

1. Using an electronic crossover as part of the preamp
2. Using a passive 12dB crossover speaker side

What is the actual effect of crossovers on our ears ? Does something special happen to the way our ears perceive music when the low frequency is separated from high frequency content ?


Some interesting stuff here:

[FONT=arial, verdana, helvetica]The dual driver in ear headphones have two drivers per earpiece and a 2-way crossover improving frequency drop, delivering a more separate sound and stronger bass. [/FONT]

Headphones - Buyer's Guide
 
an attempt at simple and sweet

1. Feel free to air your thoughts on this version.
2. PCB volunteers needed
3. How hardy is the OPA134

kind regards,

Harrison.
 

Attachments

  • preamp8p.png
    preamp8p.png
    35 KB · Views: 136
  • preamp8-fourier.png
    preamp8-fourier.png
    26.2 KB · Views: 131
  • preamp8-graph.png
    preamp8-graph.png
    14.3 KB · Views: 124
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.