Ouch. Poor planning. You'll need a bigger truck.More Candy!. I guess i have to start working now.
Added 2 sets to the spreadsheet. That should be OK for 1 stereo F5 with double FETs, using this store board, right?
P-F5c-2V20 - Pair of F-5c boards (Makes 2 channels; Rev 2.0)
Thanks,
Albert
P-F5c-2V20 - Pair of F-5c boards (Makes 2 channels; Rev 2.0)
Thanks,
Albert
I removed my interest in these FETs from the spreadsheet.I vote for triplets! I need 4x'3 matched N and P (6)'
but as this is not an option I'm in for 2x'FQA sextuplet of matched N and P (12)'
Back to what matters most.
I'm afraid to ask No, don't tell me......Back to what matters most.
Matching of the P parts has begun and going well. THe N channel parts have become a bit of a pain. I have cycled through multiple sample of the 19n20C part tha have been fake. I have some more coming that will be tested soon. If they turn out to be bogus, I think we should look at the possiblity of using the standard 19n20 (non-c) part. The numbers differ slightly, but should not present any significant difference in performance. The availiblity of P3 to trim out differences in the output stage helps us in this regard. I will provide repsonse curves for all the fets involved and if "C" designated parts cannot be sourced, then I will show comparison of "non-C" vs "C" parts. My intent was to release this info after i had gone through all alternatives, but your question presented the opportunity. My suggestion is to sit tight and I will have info very soon hopefully.
Matching of the P parts has begun and going well. THe N channel parts have become a bit of a pain. I have cycled through multiple sample of the 19n20C part tha have been fake. I have some more coming that will be tested soon. If they turn out to be bogus, I think we should look at the possiblity of using the standard 19n20 (non-c) part. The numbers differ slightly, but should not present any significant difference in performance. The availiblity of P3 to trim out differences in the output stage helps us in this regard. I will provide repsonse curves for all the fets involved and if "C" designated parts cannot be sourced, then I will show comparison of "non-C" vs "C" parts. My intent was to release this info after i had gone through all alternatives, but your question presented the opportunity. My suggestion is to sit tight and I will have info very soon hopefully.
Curious where the 19N20c parts came from?
Matching of the P parts has begun and going well. THe N channel parts have become a bit of a pain. I have cycled through multiple sample of the 19n20C part tha have been fake. I have some more coming that will be tested soon. If they turn out to be bogus, I think we should look at the possiblity of using the standard 19n20 (non-c) part. The numbers differ slightly, but should not present any significant difference in performance. The availiblity of P3 to trim out differences in the output stage helps us in this regard. I will provide repsonse curves for all the fets involved and if "C" designated parts cannot be sourced, then I will show comparison of "non-C" vs "C" parts. My intent was to release this info after i had gone through all alternatives, but your question presented the opportunity. My suggestion is to sit tight and I will have info very soon hopefully.
Thanks ....
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Fairchild interest.