F5 power amplifier

next:
insert a long interconnect into one input and the dummy plug in the second.
Is there H+N.
Now short the remote end of the long interconnect and measure again.

Swap the dummy with the long. Measure with open end and with shorted end.
Are all four results the same as the dummy plugs only? 0.0mVac?

Now repeat with a long interconnect in both inputs. First open ends and then shorted ends. two more results
and finally with the shorted ends , touch the two remote barrels together and measure this final H+N.
 
next:
insert a long interconnect into one input and the dummy plug in the second.
Is there H+N.
Now short the remote end of the long interconnect and measure again.

Swap the dummy with the long. Measure with open end and with shorted end.
Are all four results the same as the dummy plugs only? 0.0mVac?

Now repeat with a long interconnect in both inputs. First open ends and then shorted ends. two more results
and finally with the shorted ends , touch the two remote barrels together and measure this final H+N.

Ok, here we go:

D...Dummy, L...long interconnect, D+L...Dummy with a long interconnect
X... i can hear a hum, O.... I can not hear a hum


i will right it that way:

D - D: O - O

meaning: Dummy plug left, Dummy plug right: cant hear hear a hum left, cant hear a hum right.

those are my results:

L - D: X - O
L+D - D: O - O

D - L: O - X
D - L+D: O - O

L - L: X - X
L + D - L + D: O - O

L+D - L: O - X
L - L+D: X - O

I always measured 0.0mVac, also in the case when i heard a hum. But I have to admit, the hum was really quiet, but still to hear when my ear is close to the speaker. Those results show that always when I use a long interconnect without the dummy at the end I can hear a hum.

finally with the shorted ends , touch the two remote barrels together and measure this final H+N.
I am not sure that I understood what you meant. What I have done is using a long interconnect on both inputs and put them together at the open endings, thus connecting input-L with input-R and input-gnd-L with input-gnd-R. This created the loudest hum which I was able to measure resulting in 0.5mVac left and 0.4mVac right.

I also measured long interconnect and dummy on both sides, and then I connected those two, thus again a loop, but signal-inputs are connected to gnd. Same result: I can hear a hum on both sides and I can measure 0.5mVac and 0.4mVac.

Happy new year by the way!
 
I always measured 0.0mVac, also in the case when i heard a hum.
0.0mVac is completely inaudible with normal speaker sensitivity. I don't understand how you can hear any hum with voltage readings of <0.1mVac
But I have to admit, the hum was really quiet, but still to hear when my ear is close to the speaker. ............................
I also measured long interconnect and dummy on both sides, and then I connected those two, thus again a loop, but signal-inputs are connected to gnd. Same result: I can hear a hum on both sides and I can measure 0.5mVac and 0.4mVac...........
This last result is telling us that the increase in H+N voltage from 0.0mVac to 0.4mVac is due to the loop current passing around the connected Left and Right signal returns.
This is what HBRR + HBRL is intended to attenuate.
You have inserted some resistance in the wrong position.
Look again at the D.Joffe paper and work out what you have done incorrectly.
 
0.0mVac is completely inaudible with normal speaker sensitivity. I don't understand how you can hear any hum with voltage readings of <0.1mVac

It's nearly not noticeable, but I also asked my girlfriend now, she can hear it as well. When I use the DMM and measure, at the beginning it shows 0.2mVac but when I stay there it goes down to 0.0mVac...

This last result is telling us that the increase in H+N voltage from 0.0mVac to 0.4mVac is due to the loop current passing around the connected Left and Right signal returns.
This is what HBRR + HBRL is intended to attenuate.
You have inserted some resistance in the wrong position.
Look again at the D.Joffe paper and work out what you have done incorrectly.
At the moment I have no resistors added, but I will try those measures again with 10Ohms HBRR and HBRL.
 
It's nearly not noticeable, but I also asked my girlfriend now, she can hear it as well. When I use the DMM and measure, at the beginning it shows 0.2mVac but when I stay there it goes down to 0.0mVac...
Could this be a broken DMM?
0.2mVac is just about audible on 88db speakers
At the moment I have no resistors added, but I will try those measures again with 10Ohms HBRR and HBRL.
So are you back to the original build with no added resistors in the input cables?

0.2mVac is 83dB below 1W.
If you move in to 0.1m that gets the SPL up by ~ 20db from 5dB above audibility to ~ 25dB above audibility.
Move in to 0.02m and you may get another increase of a few dB, so that you can hear that 0.2mVac. I don't think I could hear that.
I think I can just about hear 0.3mVac with an ear very close to the speaker cone.
 
Last edited:
So are you back to the original build with no added resistors in the input cables?

Yes, I the original version. I wanted to use the amp yesterday evening, and as the original version was the most quiet one i went back to the original.

0.2mVac is 83dB below 1W.
If you move in to 0.1m that gets the SPL up by ~ 20db from 5dB above audibility to ~ 25dB above audibility.
Move in to 0.02m and you may get another increase of a few dB, so that you can hear that 0.2mVac. I don't think I could hear that.
I think I can just about hear 0.3mVac with an ear very close to the speaker cone.

:(, I hope not that the DMM is broken, I can only tell what I hear and see on the screen of the DMM. Hm, so do you still think that the issue comes from a cross channel ground loop?
 
If you are sure there is a big increase in hum with the connected signal returns between the two channels, then it convinces me that this is the biggest problem. Adopt the HBRR+HBRL

If you are sure that the long interconnects with the shorted remote ends is completely silent, then that points to the internal wiring being correct.

It seems that it's the PCB designer, who should have told every builder that he designed the layout to suit mono-blocks only, who made the mistake.
Stereo/multi-channel amplifiers need a different arrangement compared to mono-block. But be consoled, 90% of amp layout designers make the same mistake !
It's only in the last couple of years that a few "wide awake" Members here have adopted the HBRR+HBRL solution.
I have not seen any other solution that effectively attenuates the loop/interference current.
 
Last edited:
If you are sure there is a big increase in hum with the connected signal returns between the two channels, then it convinces me that this is the biggest problem. Adopt the HBRR+HBRL

If you are sure that the long interconnects with the shorted remote ends is completely silent, then that points to the internal wiring being correct.

It seems that it's the PCB designer, who should have told every builder that he designed the layout to suit mono-blocks only, who made the mistake.
Stereo/multi-channel amplifiers need a different arrangement compared to mono-block. But be consoled, 90% of amp layout designers make the same mistake !
It's only in the last couple of years that a few "wide awake" Members here have adopted the HBRR+HBRL solution.
I have not seen any other solution that effectively attenuates the loop/interference current.

I understand, too bad, i should have built mono-blocks then... Anyway, i will give it another try with the 10R resistors. It seems like someone had the same problem (post 14651), but I think now solution was found...
 
I did the last test (long interconnects with dummys and put together) with one hum breaking resistor, 12R (so not for both channels...).

The hum gets louder and i measure 1mVac at the output!

I really don't now whats happening, the resistor must be at the wrong spot, but I can't see why.

f5-v3.0_2.png

that's what i did. As suggested the input circuit must be complete, thus i removed R2 from the board, and soldered it as in the picture, furthermore i added the HBR.

this is the backside of the pcb

backside.JPG
 
F5 - smoked R13

Hi all, after nearly four years of regular use, my F5 let out a soft, high-pitched hum on startup, then let the smoke out. I immediately turned it off and found that R13 burned up. Nothing else is visually wrong.

The only recent change made was a speaker protector board that was added a few days ago. It ran just fine for several hours of use after the board was added.

I'd appreciate troubleshooting tips from the experts here -- thanks. :(
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi all, after nearly four years of regular use, my F5 let out a soft, high-pitched hum on startup, then let the smoke out. I immediately turned it off and found that R13 burned up. Nothing else is visually wrong.

The only recent change made was a speaker protector board that was added a few days ago. It ran just fine for several hours of use after the board was added.

I'd appreciate troubleshooting tips from the experts here -- thanks. :(

R13? The 100R mosfet gate resistor?
588721d1483181015-f5-power-amplifier-schematic.jpg