It certainly is an AB design. I would go ahead and buy 6 mosfets and use them as they are.
This link will drop you into the middle of the thread and also to Shawn's link with all the details http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=945573#post945573
Q
This link will drop you into the middle of the thread and also to Shawn's link with all the details http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=945573#post945573
Q
quasi said:
so thats original working schematics?
http://www.raindogindustrialarts.com/Images/NCHAN MOS PROJECT 06-05-06.pdf
quasi said:
Ok thanks: it seems great :
I see the pdf: it seems the power supply is not limited to +/-70V it can work at higher rates
So what are the characteristic of the amplifier input voltage THD etc ?
So how did the the development proseeded: did you use computer proframs for analyzing and calculation or you did all manually
I have answered your question here;
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1037645#post1037645
Cheers
Q
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1037645#post1037645
Cheers
Q
Hi Med,
and you still need to take account of the losses from the regulator monitoring points (both 0V and +ve/-ve) through the connecting cables and fuses through the active devices, through the emitter/source resistors, through the Thiel network, through the output cables and finally at the output terminals.
The total voltage lost can be anywhere betewen 2Volts and 15Volts plus the variations coming out from the regulated supply.
This is rubbish.
and you still need to take account of the losses from the regulator monitoring points (both 0V and +ve/-ve) through the connecting cables and fuses through the active devices, through the emitter/source resistors, through the Thiel network, through the output cables and finally at the output terminals.
The total voltage lost can be anywhere betewen 2Volts and 15Volts plus the variations coming out from the regulated supply.
Sonics - Mosfet vs Bipolar version
I gather that none around here have made both the Mosfet version and the Bipolar version of Quasi's amp, but any guesses on which would be superior sonically?
Depending on the feedback, I wish to put two channels together in the next couple of days to replace Holton's N-channel amps; this means that I have everything already assembled and only the amp boards are going to be replaced.
I'd really appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
I gather that none around here have made both the Mosfet version and the Bipolar version of Quasi's amp, but any guesses on which would be superior sonically?
Depending on the feedback, I wish to put two channels together in the next couple of days to replace Holton's N-channel amps; this means that I have everything already assembled and only the amp boards are going to be replaced.
I'd really appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
Mosfet vs Bipolar version
I have built the quasi mosfet amp with 10 mosfets per channel. I think it sounds fantastic and many others will agree. The bipolar is still on his bench so even Q's opinion is pending but how can a father choose between his two children? I guess you must be right, no one has yet built both? You could be the first if you are fast.
Cheers,
Shawn.
Samuel Jayaraj said:
I have built the quasi mosfet amp with 10 mosfets per channel. I think it sounds fantastic and many others will agree. The bipolar is still on his bench so even Q's opinion is pending but how can a father choose between his two children? I guess you must be right, no one has yet built both? You could be the first if you are fast.
Cheers,
Shawn.
Prototype almost finished
Here's a photo of the almost finished prototype. It's missing the output drivers and the output coil. I revised the layout to suit the heatsink mounting bracket I used and once tested I will post the layout for anyone who is interested.
Cheers
Q
Here's a photo of the almost finished prototype. It's missing the output drivers and the output coil. I revised the layout to suit the heatsink mounting bracket I used and once tested I will post the layout for anyone who is interested.
Cheers
Q
Attachments
Merry xmas Quasi,
I had a question that I like to ask about the pcb design. At the lower left corner there is a 0.1uf. the lower side of which goes to the ground. Instead of going to the closest ground that the 300uf had, it had to go all the way back to the middle parallel with the 300uf ground. What would be the significance of this? Hope that is not a very stupid question.
Similiar with the -ve rail.
I had a question that I like to ask about the pcb design. At the lower left corner there is a 0.1uf. the lower side of which goes to the ground. Instead of going to the closest ground that the 300uf had, it had to go all the way back to the middle parallel with the 300uf ground. What would be the significance of this? Hope that is not a very stupid question.
Similiar with the -ve rail.
Hi Bigpanda
On the positive rail there are two 0.1uf capacitors. The first one is in parallel with the electrolytic and this one is connected straight across it. These capacitors filter the positive rail after the fuse.
The other 0.1uf is connected before the fuse and provides some filtering to the positive track feeding the first and second stages. This goes back to central ground to avoid the heavy current flows associated with the output stage.
The negative rail is the same. The 0.1uf in the middle of the board filters the negative rail feeding the constant current source. This is also before the fuse and is returned via a seperate track to ground to avoid the heavy currents on the other earth track.
I hope the above makes sense. I have attached the revised layout to show how the different tracks run.
Cheers & happy Christmas
Q
On the positive rail there are two 0.1uf capacitors. The first one is in parallel with the electrolytic and this one is connected straight across it. These capacitors filter the positive rail after the fuse.
The other 0.1uf is connected before the fuse and provides some filtering to the positive track feeding the first and second stages. This goes back to central ground to avoid the heavy current flows associated with the output stage.
The negative rail is the same. The 0.1uf in the middle of the board filters the negative rail feeding the constant current source. This is also before the fuse and is returned via a seperate track to ground to avoid the heavy currents on the other earth track.
I hope the above makes sense. I have attached the revised layout to show how the different tracks run.
Cheers & happy Christmas
Q
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.