Hi Freddy,
Older designs always ran the risk of oscillation with different output types. The MJ2119x series have an fT of around 4 MHz, which is close to the average output transistor used years ago. I have had very few problems unless the stability of the amp was marginal to start. I always check of oscillation even when using the same parts. That is one reason any audio service person requires a 'scope and THD meter (or better). These things are not optional, in addition to a good DVM. Every shop used to have at least these things and knew how to get the most from them. Today I hear people say they can test distortion with their hearing. Well people, that is not true, not even close. I get products in with several percent THD right from a "good" service person without equipment - but it passed the hearing test. Once you fix the unit, the owner hears the difference readily. Also, high distortion normally points to another problem, some serious.
-Chris
Older designs always ran the risk of oscillation with different output types. The MJ2119x series have an fT of around 4 MHz, which is close to the average output transistor used years ago. I have had very few problems unless the stability of the amp was marginal to start. I always check of oscillation even when using the same parts. That is one reason any audio service person requires a 'scope and THD meter (or better). These things are not optional, in addition to a good DVM. Every shop used to have at least these things and knew how to get the most from them. Today I hear people say they can test distortion with their hearing. Well people, that is not true, not even close. I get products in with several percent THD right from a "good" service person without equipment - but it passed the hearing test. Once you fix the unit, the owner hears the difference readily. Also, high distortion normally points to another problem, some serious.
-Chris
Please post in English.
hi, Anatech
Of course , sorry translate french-english , first language is french ( belgium Wallon )
Goodnight all,
it's been a long time since I came to the forum, but I'm delighted to see the enthusiasm surrounding this amp which is often diverted from sound to stereo. its weight makes it a cannonball I agree, but its reliability and its musical rendering make it forget this weight.
I still use it a few times on my JBL E100, but in the meantime I have found my second QSC studio 1100 amp which I bridge per channel and which delivers 140W into 8 ohms. talking with other people on various forums, I hesitated to operate my 2 QSCs in bridge mode on the bi-amplification and I then passed the course. I switched to bi-amp mode with the BGW on the woofers and the 2 QSC studio 1100s, still in bridge on the mid-treble part, I was again amazed by the sound reproduction as well as the dynamics obtained, in terms of consumption it's not ideal to use 3 amps for listening, but I only allow myself to use 2 to 3 per month because I rarely have time to sit down to listen to my music at home .
Of course , sorry translate french-english , first language is french ( belgium Wallon )
Goodnight all,
it's been a long time since I came to the forum, but I'm delighted to see the enthusiasm surrounding this amp which is often diverted from sound to stereo. its weight makes it a cannonball I agree, but its reliability and its musical rendering make it forget this weight.
I still use it a few times on my JBL E100, but in the meantime I have found my second QSC studio 1100 amp which I bridge per channel and which delivers 140W into 8 ohms. talking with other people on various forums, I hesitated to operate my 2 QSCs in bridge mode on the bi-amplification and I then passed the course. I switched to bi-amp mode with the BGW on the woofers and the 2 QSC studio 1100s, still in bridge on the mid-treble part, I was again amazed by the sound reproduction as well as the dynamics obtained, in terms of consumption it's not ideal to use 3 amps for listening, but I only allow myself to use 2 to 3 per month because I rarely have time to sit down to listen to my music at home .
Hi titoon,
Welcome back firstly!
Using an electronic crossover is the best, specially if you can remove the passive crossover. One amplifier per driver, and you get amazing dynamics and much lower distortion. Oh yeah, it goes louder too!
Amplifiers operate better in normal mode. Bridging an amplifier brings problems and I think you may find it sounds cleaner in normal mode. For one thing, damping factor in bridged mode is 1/2 normal mode.
-Chris
Welcome back firstly!
Using an electronic crossover is the best, specially if you can remove the passive crossover. One amplifier per driver, and you get amazing dynamics and much lower distortion. Oh yeah, it goes louder too!
Amplifiers operate better in normal mode. Bridging an amplifier brings problems and I think you may find it sounds cleaner in normal mode. For one thing, damping factor in bridged mode is 1/2 normal mode.
-Chris
bonjour anatech
Je n'avais pas pensé à cette configuration, je l'utilise dans ma sono utilisation de mes T3V avec deux DCX2496 pour la séparation des 4 canaux (infra - grave - médium - aigu) mais je n'avais jamais utilisé cela en hifi stéréo .
ma configuration hifi stéréo, cela comprend un lecteur multimédia Auna ituner CD internet DAB+ et FM avec Lan et wifi. Double 1228 platine vinyle et mes 3 amplis . J'ai encore un DCX2496le libre mais passer par un système actif va compliquer le nombre de câbles à passer pour les 3 voies à séparer.
Phil
Je n'avais pas pensé à cette configuration, je l'utilise dans ma sono utilisation de mes T3V avec deux DCX2496 pour la séparation des 4 canaux (infra - grave - médium - aigu) mais je n'avais jamais utilisé cela en hifi stéréo .
ma configuration hifi stéréo, cela comprend un lecteur multimédia Auna ituner CD internet DAB+ et FM avec Lan et wifi. Double 1228 platine vinyle et mes 3 amplis . J'ai encore un DCX2496le libre mais passer par un système actif va compliquer le nombre de câbles à passer pour les 3 voies à séparer.
Phil
Hi Phil,
I'm using Google translate to understand you so I'll paste that here so others can follow.
My system uses a Revox B-261 tuner, Denon DCD-S10, Thorens TD-126 MKII + Ortofon 540 MKII, Node 2i streamer through a Marantz 300DC and currently Yamaha C-70 preamp (normally a Marantz SC-9 switch problems). Everything has been optimized and modified for increased performance. My current speakers are PSB Stratus Gold (original), looking at Klipsch RF-7 III. My current speakers are hard to beat, the system has been stable for over a decade. I also have a Nakamichi CR-5 cassette deck, sold my Tascam BR-20 (the cost of tape - yikes!). I have a few other good systems in other rooms, all have steamers. All my audio streamers and TV streamers are wired network connections. That is far better (good thing I wired the entire house when it was new!).
-Chris
I'm using Google translate to understand you so I'll paste that here so others can follow.
Just keep your filter slopes reasonable. Too steep is not good!
My system uses a Revox B-261 tuner, Denon DCD-S10, Thorens TD-126 MKII + Ortofon 540 MKII, Node 2i streamer through a Marantz 300DC and currently Yamaha C-70 preamp (normally a Marantz SC-9 switch problems). Everything has been optimized and modified for increased performance. My current speakers are PSB Stratus Gold (original), looking at Klipsch RF-7 III. My current speakers are hard to beat, the system has been stable for over a decade. I also have a Nakamichi CR-5 cassette deck, sold my Tascam BR-20 (the cost of tape - yikes!). I have a few other good systems in other rooms, all have steamers. All my audio streamers and TV streamers are wired network connections. That is far better (good thing I wired the entire house when it was new!).
-Chris