analysis epsilon

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Hi Brian

Made a frame of wood and drilled holes through the sides and put long screw's in.
Then I glue the frame to mylar.
I put a aluminum profile over the screw's and mount springs.
Attach the profile to the speaker mdf and now I can adjust the tension of the mylar.
Then I use aluminum tape 9mm wide from farnell for the conductors.

Rob
 
Henry, you are a maniac. In the best possible way. :D I marvel at all your work.

Some more for you to marvel at!! Finished latest design using 80 meters of 4.5 mm wide tape. The first 45 meters ran out before I realized. So the diaphragm is in 2 unequal parts which caused problems when wiring in parallel and the top half is louder than the bottom half. You live and learn. It is running with my first epsilon layout design (with the glued magnets) The small A4 sized design is my next rebuild.:h_ache: Then I may finish my planar headphones next.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0137.JPG
    SAM_0137.JPG
    857.7 KB · Views: 761
  • SAM_0146.JPG
    SAM_0146.JPG
    759.1 KB · Views: 693
  • SAM_0147.JPG
    SAM_0147.JPG
    713 KB · Views: 650
  • SAM_0148.JPG
    SAM_0148.JPG
    734.1 KB · Views: 624
  • SAM_0150.JPG
    SAM_0150.JPG
    823.8 KB · Views: 586
  • SAM_0151.JPG
    SAM_0151.JPG
    760.4 KB · Views: 124
  • SAM_0152.JPG
    SAM_0152.JPG
    716.4 KB · Views: 127
  • SAM_0153.JPG
    SAM_0153.JPG
    905.7 KB · Views: 127
  • SAM_0140.JPG
    SAM_0140.JPG
    817.3 KB · Views: 170
  • SAM_0139.JPG
    SAM_0139.JPG
    808.8 KB · Views: 147
MY A4 SIZE REBUILD.

Some more photos of my latest rebuild. The last but one is the old diaphragm, and the last photo is the new tape 2.25 mm wide to fit magnets on the rebuilt diaphragm using epsilon layout.:D I think it's called being obsessive.!! After this it's my planar headphones, to be finished. Then it's back to the rebuilds, all that tape cutting, about 300 meters.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0163.JPG
    SAM_0163.JPG
    703.2 KB · Views: 132
  • SAM_0162.JPG
    SAM_0162.JPG
    680.5 KB · Views: 115
  • SAM_0160.JPG
    SAM_0160.JPG
    675.5 KB · Views: 103
  • SAM_0159.JPG
    SAM_0159.JPG
    779.1 KB · Views: 96
  • SAM_0158.JPG
    SAM_0158.JPG
    682.9 KB · Views: 120
  • SAM_0157.JPG
    SAM_0157.JPG
    729.6 KB · Views: 126
  • SAM_0155.JPG
    SAM_0155.JPG
    735.8 KB · Views: 146
  • SAM_0154.JPG
    SAM_0154.JPG
    777.7 KB · Views: 190
  • SAM_0164.JPG
    SAM_0164.JPG
    526.4 KB · Views: 123
  • SAM_0156.JPG
    SAM_0156.JPG
    737.6 KB · Views: 194
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
slant

I'm a total noob in planar theory. What's the rationale for non-parallel long sides (highlighted in the attachment) on your larger designs? This seems to be prevalent in a lot of planar speakers.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0147a.JPG
    SAM_0147a.JPG
    151.4 KB · Views: 300
Last edited:
Some more photos of my latest rebuild. The last but one is the old diaphragm, and the last photo is the new tape 2.25 mm wide to fit magnets on the rebuilt diaphragm using epsilon layout.:D I think it's called being obsessive.!! After this it's my planar headphones, to be finished. Then it's back to the rebuilds, all that tape cutting, about 300 meters.

Hi Henry
nice work!
What's the resistance of the small planars?
and, how does they sound? mine are a bit weak on bass... (size matters)

Regards
Pedro
 
Hi Henry
nice work!
What's the resistance of the small planars?
and, how does they sound? mine are a bit weak on bass... (size matters)

Regards
Pedro
I have stopped work on these at the moment as I ruined the diaphragm fitting it to the surround, and I have not heard it at this time. The resistance of the old diaphragm was 1.4 ohms, the new one is 4.4 ohms.
 
Does anyone know what technique Analysis uses to solder to their aluminum conductors? In some thread I haven't yet found again there was a discussion of techniques for breaking through the aluminum oxide layer while soldering but that approach doesn't seem applicable to very thin (5.5 micron) aluminum foil.
Few
 
Thanks jer, that's the one I remembered. Unfortunately I don't think it's applicable to thin foils. I fear the mechanical scrubbing step would beat them up too much.

I'm a bit lost with the Farnell link but figured I'd make yet another attempt to find a promising source of solder for aluminum. KappAloy9 popped up but I haven't yet found a way to buy it.

Is that conventional Ersin multicore? I would have thought it would have the same problems with the oxide as other electronic solders. No?
 
Thanks jer, that's the one I remembered. Unfortunately I don't think it's applicable to thin foils. I fear the mechanical scrubbing step would beat them up too much.

I'm a bit lost with the Farnell link but figured I'd make yet another attempt to find a promising source of solder for aluminum. KappAloy9 popped up but I haven't yet found a way to buy it.

Is that conventional Ersin multicore? I would have thought it would have the same problems with the oxide as other electronic solders. No?


The multicore solder works like a charm on foil!;)
 
The multicore solder works like a charm on foil!

Good to know. I'll give it a try. I can't quite tell from the photo you posted which variety of Ersin solder you've had success with. My searching suggests there are multiple varieties. Does it say anything that distinguishes it on the label?

I never use solder just a penny washer, works every time and lasts for years.

I may be doing something closer to the Analysis Epsilon approach than running a single conductor over the whole diaphragm. I'd rather be able to make solder connections at the top and bottom of each conductor than rely on tons of mechanical connections.

Thanks, all.
Few
 
Last edited:
next project headphones 2 designs

The blue ones are my latest rebuilds, 7.1 Ohms. Then headphones 2 layouts see which is the best!
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0179.JPG
    SAM_0179.JPG
    826 KB · Views: 116
  • SAM_0178.JPG
    SAM_0178.JPG
    871.6 KB · Views: 141
  • SAM_0177.JPG
    SAM_0177.JPG
    888.4 KB · Views: 337
  • SAM_0176.JPG
    SAM_0176.JPG
    937.8 KB · Views: 367
  • SAM_0181.JPG
    SAM_0181.JPG
    699.4 KB · Views: 356
  • SAM_0180.JPG
    SAM_0180.JPG
    781 KB · Views: 378
some more pics of rebuilds

A epsilon layout design using 5 separate layouts on 1 diaphragm, using 40 x 25 x 10 mm ferrites.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0205.JPG
    SAM_0205.JPG
    769.4 KB · Views: 109
  • SAM_0204.JPG
    SAM_0204.JPG
    726 KB · Views: 94
  • SAM_0203.JPG
    SAM_0203.JPG
    767.7 KB · Views: 97
  • SAM_0202.JPG
    SAM_0202.JPG
    752.2 KB · Views: 59
  • SAM_0201.JPG
    SAM_0201.JPG
    745.7 KB · Views: 67
  • SAM_0200.JPG
    SAM_0200.JPG
    719.2 KB · Views: 75
  • SAM_0198.JPG
    SAM_0198.JPG
    711.5 KB · Views: 83
  • SAM_0195.JPG
    SAM_0195.JPG
    690.9 KB · Views: 89
  • SAM_0197.JPG
    SAM_0197.JPG
    766.2 KB · Views: 83
  • SAM_0196.JPG
    SAM_0196.JPG
    742.8 KB · Views: 114
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.