Aino gradient - a collaborative speaker project

AINOgradient v3 outdoor measeurements

Mods
- HM to T xo at 4kHz, milder slopes, PEQ adjusted, delay adjusted
- LM to HM xo at 800Hz, PEQ adjusted
 

Attachments

  • ainog v3 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    ainog v3 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    63.8 KB · Views: 521
  • ainog v3 out 9ms 0 15 30 45 60 90.png
    ainog v3 out 9ms 0 15 30 45 60 90.png
    90.1 KB · Views: 515
AINOgradient v31 outdoor measurements

Still some more tuning. I also tríed to measure bass box outside but it was meaningless, the floor and room make such a big difference! It was difficult to match level and the radiation/spl spectrum was so different. I tested the box and tower in my living room and I got a very nice result - but I didn't save it.

I measured individual drivers' responses at angles. The upper mid (2x Vifa NE95) is making the 2kHz bump in 60 and 90¤ measurements. It is perhaps the reflection from the top plate of bass box and the Fountek tweeter. However JohnK is having same problems with his NaO designs. - I can't make it any better with Aino. I also took vertical measurements, but angles are "by hand"

All in all, it looks like I'm done with outdoor tuning :):cool::)

Horizontal angles 0, 30, 60 and 90¤
 

Attachments

  • ainog v31 out 0¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    ainog v31 out 0¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    57.7 KB · Views: 490
  • ainog v31 out 30¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    ainog v31 out 30¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    57.5 KB · Views: 478
  • ainog v31 out 60¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    ainog v31 out 60¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    59.4 KB · Views: 469
  • ainog v31 out 90¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    ainog v31 out 90¤ 9ms all indiv 13.png
    58.9 KB · Views: 71
  • NaO Polar comp.png
    NaO Polar comp.png
    371.1 KB · Views: 94
  • ainog v31 out 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    ainog v31 out 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    78 KB · Views: 86
  • ainog v31 out 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    ainog v31 out 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    60.3 KB · Views: 81
Last edited:
AINOgradient v3 (sic!) outdoor

Vertical dispersion

Angles are rough estimates. I was alone and didn't use a measuring tape. When listening by ear, you can hear upper mids going down first. I think that it is too difficult for me to do any better vertical measurements (other more important tasks like mowing the grass...)
 

Attachments

  • ainog v3 out vertical down.png
    ainog v3 out vertical down.png
    69.4 KB · Views: 749
  • ainog v3 out vertical up.png
    ainog v3 out vertical up.png
    51.7 KB · Views: 86
8-channel power amplifier construction has begun!

I went to the community junkyard looking at recycling bin of electronics. I picked a Philips dvd which has a full steel box in good condition (I was hoping to find an AV-amp with lots of RCA-connectors but the bin had been emptied recently.)

The internals were taken away and a copper plate works as installation plate for 4 B&O ICEpower modules. AC connector has a 2-pole switch, a fusebox and condensators to kill peak currents when switching. The speaker connectors are 4-pole Neutrik speakons. There will be speakons also at the AINO-end of cables, they will lock securely and easily!

Christian from Grävenwiesbach, Germany has delivered special connectors for ICEpower modules (not shown), thank you Christian!
 

Attachments

  • amplifiers layout test.jpg
    amplifiers layout test.jpg
    289.9 KB · Views: 203
  • box stripping.jpg
    box stripping.jpg
    254.1 KB · Views: 191
Last edited:
AINOgradient v31 minidsp settings

The bass and tweeter don't have any PEQ.

T lower and upper mids have LR2 (12dB/oct) electronig xo at strange frequencies compared to acoustical measurements. I have tried various LR and BW curves and frequencies, but the dipole function gives the dirvers so strange output that I had to stop caring how electric/dsp xo look. I have started from empty table many times but I end up something like this every time.

Because of low HP xo and mild slope the LM (Beyma12") takes quite lots of energy in, but it is very hard to feel the membrane moving at all. There should ot me any problem of hitting Xmax or even getting high distortion. Reember that this is a PA midwoofer!
 

Attachments

  • AINOgradient valmis v31 xo minidsp.png
    AINOgradient valmis v31 xo minidsp.png
    173.6 KB · Views: 189
  • AINOgradient valmis v31 LM peq.png
    AINOgradient valmis v31 LM peq.png
    56.9 KB · Views: 78
  • AINOgradient valmis v31 HM peq.png
    AINOgradient valmis v31 HM peq.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 706
8ch amp overheating!

After being on idle power for one hour, the amp started to give rattling pulses to LM channel. I opened the case but did'nt find weak solderings by hand. The temperature at power stage coil housings was 55¤C, elsewhere 37¤C.

When swtichin on (4 modules simultaneously) the house's regional fuse blows. After switching the fuse (a relay really) on the start is ok (condensators partially loaded?)

This means: separate right and left channel in two ventilated boxes. Resolder wires.
- a new visit to the junkyard tomorrow!
 
AINOgradient w. ICEpower inroom measurements

V1 xo settings and the protoversion of bass cabinet. The pole was not at an ideal position and at some 80cm distance from the woofer. It was impossible to get W to LM phase right. I didn't have lots of time to set parameters but it was nice to notice that room response is very constant at different time windows.

The horizontal angulation was 0¤ to the microphone, at ^2m distance and 105cm height (near my sweet spot) The speaker pole was some 50cm from the front wall (actually a window!) and at 30¤ angle to it. The living room can be seen in one of my previous posts. It has RT around .4-.6 but quite evenly. A nasty room mode appears at 61Hz.

One speaker playing (left)
 

Attachments

  • ainog ice room all ind 30ms 13.png
    ainog ice room all ind 30ms 13.png
    72.9 KB · Views: 140
  • ainog ice v1 room all indiv 30ms 112.png
    ainog ice v1 room all indiv 30ms 112.png
    97 KB · Views: 73
  • ainog ice v1 room spl phase 3ms 112.png
    ainog ice v1 room spl phase 3ms 112.png
    74.9 KB · Views: 70
  • ainog ice v1 room spl phase 200ms.png
    ainog ice v1 room spl phase 200ms.png
    168.3 KB · Views: 1,200
Last edited:
AINOgradient ice v1 inroom measurements

Left speaker

Looking at the decay in a non-treated living room with highish RT - I must say that the strong and controlled directivity of AINOgradient really works :Present:
 

Attachments

  • ainog ive v1 room decay spectr 112.png
    ainog ive v1 room decay spectr 112.png
    309.4 KB · Views: 463
  • ainog ice v1 room water 112.png
    ainog ice v1 room water 112.png
    186 KB · Views: 462
  • ainog ice v1 room rt edt.png
    ainog ice v1 room rt edt.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 807
  • ainog ice v1 filt ir etc zoom.png
    ainog ice v1 filt ir etc zoom.png
    68.9 KB · Views: 477
  • ainog ice v1 filt ir.png
    ainog ice v1 filt ir.png
    44.7 KB · Views: 480
Last edited:
I went a little back in xo versions and revisited proto v3, because it seems that the bumps in 60¤ response are at dipole peaks of LM and HM drivers and could be treated only by setting xo very close (advice from Rudolf).

I lowered xo-frequencies and tried to get as shallow slopes as possible. Setting frequencies in minidsp plugin has only mild reflection to acoustic measurements. Numerous adjustments to parametric eq and at least 100 measurements during 2 days was needed to get things settled. I didn't use the bass box outside - it is a number in itself to match with the rest indoors.

But it looks better now. Also the low end of LM driver looks easier to match with the woofer.

It was rather noisy outside and the last measurements (saved) were taken late in the evening at low level. The minidsp starts making high distortion after saving the settings - an annoiying habit!

AINOgradient ICEpower v42 outdoor measurements
 

Attachments

  • ainog v42 out 9ms 0¤ spl phase 112.png
    ainog v42 out 9ms 0¤ spl phase 112.png
    58.7 KB · Views: 81
  • ainog ice v42 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    ainog ice v42 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    70.9 KB · Views: 721
  • ainog ice v42 0¤ gd 9ms.png
    ainog ice v42 0¤ gd 9ms.png
    41.1 KB · Views: 86
  • ainog ice v42 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 112.png
    ainog ice v42 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 112.png
    78.7 KB · Views: 80
  • ainog ice v42 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    ainog ice v42 out 9ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    64.6 KB · Views: 79
  • ainog ice v42 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    ainog ice v42 0 30 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    53 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Geddes optomal directivity graph.png
    Geddes optomal directivity graph.png
    33.2 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:
It was thundering, I had to do measurements indoors. First I set the speaker in the middle of the room for directivity measurements, then to listening position. I have only the proto woofer box available now but the poles play stereo well, singers are on left/woofer side though.

AINOgradient ice v42 indoor with woofer

basic measurements of the speaker

rta ambient noise reveals some strange peaks, I believe that they come from minidsp.
 

Attachments

  • ainog ice v42 room 0¤ spl phase 20ms nosmo.png
    ainog ice v42 room 0¤ spl phase 20ms nosmo.png
    127.4 KB · Views: 95
  • ainog ice v42 room 0¤ spl phase 100ms.png
    ainog ice v42 room 0¤ spl phase 100ms.png
    109.3 KB · Views: 71
  • ainog ice v42 room 0¤ gd 9ms.png
    ainog ice v42 room 0¤ gd 9ms.png
    63.6 KB · Views: 66
  • ainog ice v4in 100ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    ainog ice v4in 100ms 0¤ all indiv 13.png
    76.7 KB · Views: 520
  • ainogice v42 in 0¤ ambient noise rta.png
    ainogice v42 in 0¤ ambient noise rta.png
    53 KB · Views: 81
Last edited:
AINOgradient ice v42 indoor directivity

there is a dip in 90¤ response at 1kHz, I don't know where it comes from, but I guess it is a phase issue. however 0 and 180¤ phases are ok.
 

Attachments

  • ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 100ms 13.png
    ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 100ms 13.png
    70.7 KB · Views: 75
  • ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 9ms 13.png
    72.1 KB · Views: 69
  • ainogice v42 in 0 90 135 180¤ 9ms 13.png
    ainogice v42 in 0 90 135 180¤ 9ms 13.png
    54.7 KB · Views: 64
  • ainogice v42 in 0 90 135 180¤ 100ms 13.png
    ainogice v42 in 0 90 135 180¤ 100ms 13.png
    52.3 KB · Views: 55
  • ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    ainogice v42 in 0 15 30 45 60 90¤ 9ms 112.png
    96.9 KB · Views: 67
This is what happens when I put AINO to it's supposed position (left main speaker) in my living room. Well - minidsp has also the possibility to use PEQ in the input channel (L and R separately)

This is not the finished version. When I get them I must start room measurements/eq, placement adjustments and room treatment (something easy because this is the family living room!)

I don't want to comment the perceived sound quality much, but some notes:
- stereo imaging very good and solid
- bass very very good, deep and clean, easy to follow bass lines (but heard only from one woofer so far)
- vocals extremely good, specially male voice
- clean and crisp transients (piano, cymbals etc.)
- kind of airy and light overall sonic atmosphere in the room.
- sweet spot -listener gets rewarded also

I believe that main reasons for this are:
- a good woofer in a solid sealed box and downfiring - less reflections (all of sound reflected from floor!)
-100-400Hz is radiated from two tranducers 60cm apart, reflections get mixed too
- dipole funtion minimizes lateral radiation, thus lower level of late reflections from the floor, walls and ceiling
- double aluminium 4" and a ribbon tweeter, thus good transients at hig Fq
- better than average phase matching of a 4-way speaker
 

Attachments

  • ainogice v42 stereo spl average 112.png
    ainogice v42 stereo spl average 112.png
    138.4 KB · Views: 84
  • ainogice v42 stereo lr sep 100ms 13.png
    ainogice v42 stereo lr sep 100ms 13.png
    55.3 KB · Views: 78
Last edited:
It was raining again, I took measurements of my version of MarK's ER18DXT, to find out the real measured differencies compared to AINO.

I show here some graphics that open up the question. The differencies that matter are:
- less decay smearing with AINO
- less group delay humps with AINO
- more even direct response with AINO
- better low and high Fq extension with AINO
- more even bass response at listening position with ER18DXT
 

Attachments

  • aino vs er18dxt decay spectr.png
    aino vs er18dxt decay spectr.png
    587.6 KB · Views: 82
  • aino vs er18dxt spl 2ms 300ms.png
    aino vs er18dxt spl 2ms 300ms.png
    187.9 KB · Views: 89
  • aino vs er18dxt gd.png
    aino vs er18dxt gd.png
    165.3 KB · Views: 93
Last edited: