Aftermarket ac power cable-put your opinions here too :-)

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Member
Joined 2016
Paid Member
Three orders..pffft
Had two diodes fail. Three inches in diameter each. Silicon brazed to a .090 thick molybdenum disc. Failed at 6300 amps, 4.5 kelvin.
Used a laser scriber to cut then into 125 dice .2 inches sq. Probed them to map vf. Put together a setup to keep errors to 100 microvolts during probing, didn't want heating to cause drift.

Radiation damage caused vf increase. Rad source was one inch from edge, so line source rads caused huge vf gradient.

Expecting .770 millivolts +/- 100 microvolts..what was I thinkin???

4.2 volts close to beam, 1.8 volts 2 inches away.
3 orders...pffft

Jn
There will be papers written, big time stuff.

I don't care.

Thanks, fascinating... That must be the most interesting thing I've read in here for ages... you should start your own blog!!
 
Member
Joined 2016
Paid Member
1.7m is actually the quarter wavelength of a 50Hz sound wave travelling through air at 330m/s.

However, I have no idea why that justifies the manufacturer's claim that 1.7m is the best length for a mains cable!

Ah - got it now. The cable has to be 1/4 wave of 50Hz in the air, as the kit that needs it is so badly designed it creates a colossal audible hum which vibrates the mains cable to just the right shape to reduce the hum loop...
 
Thanks, fascinating... That must be the most interesting thing I've read in here for ages... you should start your own blog!!
That sounds even too geeky for me..

Way back in the day I worked for a diode manu. To speed up reverse recovery, we would diffuse in either gold or platinum. It would cause lattice defects in the silicon, so charge carriers would recombine quickly, as the other mechanism was sweeping them out by the voltage. Radiation, ion implantation was another way of causing defects, but frowned upon as the diode could partially recover and slow down. Also, all the techniques increased vf and reverse leakage.

The diodes that failed were one inch from the heavy ion beam, so bremsstrahlung radiation would hit the edge of the diode closest to the beam the hardest. It was an inch away, the other edge was four inches away so saw less damage.
Eventually, the less damaged lower vf side would shrink to the point where the current density was too much and it would melt.
Failures cost in excess of 10 million dollars. So we try to avoid that.


Jn
 
Last edited:
No I meant as a filter.
A filter is a circuit that reduces a problematic frequency by a reasonable amount.

So in general it will depend on the impedances of the wall outlet, the impedance of the "line cord" and the impedance of the device connected to the "line cord" if and at what frequencies a "reasonable amount" of attenuation is available.

Further in the case of more specialised cables, covered with absorptive material so transforming field energy to heat, there will be attenuation available that rises with frequency and length of the cable, therefore qualifies as a filter element.
 
But what brand of mains cable do you use on the instrumentation?
Why, we make our own of course..
You've no idea how difficult it is braiding three pieces of 535 kcmil wire, nor crimping all three into an IEC female.
Plus, we end up duct taping the equipment to the benches because the cables pull them off. One guy dropped a line cord on his foot, he wasn't wearing his steel toe shoes, they managed to put his foot back together, we call him gimp now.

Jn

Odd how the nanovoltmeter even comes with a stock cord.
 
I do hope that experiment works. No idea what it would mean to physics to find out which way gravity works on antimatter but just astounding that they are even trying to measure it. :)
They do come up with weird stuff to do. With the last one, they verified that anti hydrogen has the same transition spectra as hydrogen, to I think 12 decimal places, using laser spectroscopy.

I read the paper, it was really easy to follow...until about the third word in the first paragraph.

Really, is this English.???

I will always cherish being given credit in one of their write ups..."photo courtesy of"...;)

Jn
 
I like the Audioquest storm series of power cords.
https://www.audioquest.com/cables/ac-power-cables/storm-series/thunder-high-current
Some of the cr@p from this website;

Alternating Current (AC), is a far-from-perfect power source. AC power technology is well over a century old and was never designed to meet the exacting standards of today’s high resolution audio-video components. AC noise is present at the utility source, and is then exacerbated by radio frequency noise that is induced (picked up by the AC power cord) and coupled to the component power supplies and to circuit ground. This creates distortion and low-level signal losses via the “masking effect.” Further, power amplifiers can require immense reserves of transient current for their power supplies to react to and then stabilize during dynamic audio passages. Most AC power cords and power conditioner-regenerators, though helpful to a point, are simply not up to the task.

Power amplifiers present a real challenge for any AC power source, as the transient current requirements (though short in duration) can be many times that of the average (RMS) current consumption. Power amplifiers are also unique from all other components in that the current draw is dynamic, not constant, and it changes with volume and audio signal content. Though many AC power cords may feature low DC resistance to allow for some of this requirement, the characteristic impedance of the AC cable is equally responsible for assuring uncompromised performance. Many premium AC cords constrict or compress the audio transient as their characteristic impedance restricts the transient current.

Who writes this nonsense?
 
https://www.audioquest.com/cables/ac-power-cables/storm-series/thunder-high-current
Some of the cr@p from this website;

Alternating Current (AC), is a far-from-perfect power source. AC power technology is well over a century old and was never designed to meet the exacting standards of today’s high resolution audio-video components [so what? how do we design a better "AC power technology"?]. AC noise is present at the utility source, and is then exacerbated by radio frequency noise [really, "exacerbated"?] that is induced (picked up by the AC power cord) and coupled to the component power supplies and to circuit ground. This creates distortion and low-level signal losses via the “masking effect.” [really, distortions via "masking effect"? WTF is that?] Further, power amplifiers can require immense reserves of transient current for their power supplies[yes, so do almost all AC appliances]to react to and then stabilize during dynamic audio passages . Most AC power cords and power conditioner-regenerators, though helpful to a point, are simply not up to the task.[really? Says who?]

Power amplifiers present a real challenge for any AC power source [yes, so does my laundry drier], as the transient current requirements (though short in duration) can be many times that of the average (RMS) current consumption. Power amplifiers are also unique from all other components in that the current draw is dynamic, not constant [yes, so does my tea kettle], and it changes with volume and audio signal content. Though many AC power cords may feature low DC resistance to allow for some of this requirement, the characteristic impedance of the AC cable is equally responsible for assuring uncompromised performance. [for power cables at 50Hz, what is the "characteristic impedance"? How does it matter?] Many premium AC cords constrict or compress the audio transient as their characteristic impedance restricts the transient current. [utter BS]


@ Tromperie,

Apart from the last sentence that certainly needs some real evidence:
"Many premium AC cords constrict or compress the audio transient as their characteristic impedance restricts the transient current."

there isn´t much nonsense in the cited paragraphs.


Once again, when it comes to the audio your BS detection level is set very, very high.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.