You cant be serious, this is so silly... Advanced Physics Lab... its a resistor wrapped in some ERS cloth or similar...
Great come back, with a pseudo technical question, you do make a good double act... The Quantum Twins
I wonder if the existence of quantum information when a band is playing is the reason why analog sounds better than digital sound.
When you think about it when you are playing back a digital recording you are reproducing the sound by recreating it by causing electrons to build up or oscillate at a certain frequency through the process of flipping switches to finely replicate the same electrical signal which was present at the time of recording/ADC.
But when you think about it a recording onto analog media would be made in the time of the original production of the music. So maybe a recording of the quantum information is also present on analog recordings? And the reason why digital audio sounds so badly is because we are in affect producing a synthehol version of the real thing without the same quantum noise present at the time of the recording. The two quantum information fields then clash with each other and cause problems and interference.
Basically a piece of time, the 4th dimension, is present on the analog recording medium.
But we strip that 4th dimension out, the quantum entanglement, when we record or reproduce a digital signal.
Basically a vibration from a microphone produces an electron which produces a signal which alters the magnetic polarization of iron particles on a tape, but maybe the quantum information is preserved along with it?. But when you 'measure' those same electrical signals and provide a mathmatic representation of those same signals you are removing the possibility of quantum information being present in the reproduced audio.
It works for vinyl aswell. because there is a physical connection between the microphone, the electrical cable, and the stylus of a record. But because quantum entanglement doesn't require a physical connection between two materials to change or alter the information stored in the atoms of the medium that is being recorded upon that is why quantum signals are preserved at all.
But when you remove that process of being in the same space-time as the particles of air which are being vibrated by using a digital process you are discarding such information. You are in effect creating a painting of the past in the form of audio signals but when you look at a painting you are not playing back the past. The quantum information which has come and gone has not been preserved in the digital realm. But could have in the analog realm.
The million dollar question is, does quantum information get passed from the air molecules to the analog recording medium in some fashion.
When you think about it when you are playing back a digital recording you are reproducing the sound by recreating it by causing electrons to build up or oscillate at a certain frequency through the process of flipping switches to finely replicate the same electrical signal which was present at the time of recording/ADC.
But when you think about it a recording onto analog media would be made in the time of the original production of the music. So maybe a recording of the quantum information is also present on analog recordings? And the reason why digital audio sounds so badly is because we are in affect producing a synthehol version of the real thing without the same quantum noise present at the time of the recording. The two quantum information fields then clash with each other and cause problems and interference.
Basically a piece of time, the 4th dimension, is present on the analog recording medium.
But we strip that 4th dimension out, the quantum entanglement, when we record or reproduce a digital signal.
Basically a vibration from a microphone produces an electron which produces a signal which alters the magnetic polarization of iron particles on a tape, but maybe the quantum information is preserved along with it?. But when you 'measure' those same electrical signals and provide a mathmatic representation of those same signals you are removing the possibility of quantum information being present in the reproduced audio.
It works for vinyl aswell. because there is a physical connection between the microphone, the electrical cable, and the stylus of a record. But because quantum entanglement doesn't require a physical connection between two materials to change or alter the information stored in the atoms of the medium that is being recorded upon that is why quantum signals are preserved at all.
But when you remove that process of being in the same space-time as the particles of air which are being vibrated by using a digital process you are discarding such information. You are in effect creating a painting of the past in the form of audio signals but when you look at a painting you are not playing back the past. The quantum information which has come and gone has not been preserved in the digital realm. But could have in the analog realm.
The million dollar question is, does quantum information get passed from the air molecules to the analog recording medium in some fashion.
Last edited:
It isn’t 25W without its hearsink...
NEW Dale RH25R025J 0.025 Ohm 5% 25 Watt Metal Power Resistor 25W | eBay
Attachments
Last edited:
Well google helps.
BMI 8800 seems to be a dedicated power line scope capable of 4MHz.
Nowdays anyone can get 10-100x faster scope for not too much money.
So equipment is not a problem, yet nobody could measure the unmeasurable? Probably because there is nothing to measure.
Don't contribute to it, then!
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I think the idea was to demonstrate that beryllium resisters have a greater power density than conventional resisters.
Does that mean the inventor of them is a genius in quantum theory and DOES understand it but it holding back on his genius?
Lucky us, that he has decided not to benefit mankind but only to benefit audiophiles very subtly (in exchange for a lot of cash)..
Or did he just come across the effect by accident with no theory ? In which case.. how does he know it is based on quantum theory if no-one understands it? Except he does.... yet it was an accident... but he won't tell us about it. Doesn't make sense.
Or another option: I sell this ****, I think it works/I pretend it works (delete as appropriate). I make up that it's to do with quantum theory so that I can tell people that no-one understands it ... therefore I don't have to answer their intrusive questions into my sales practice..
I think someone should read a tiny bit about quantum theory and effects.
Heating and quantum effects absolutely do not live in the same worlds. Just understand what the "quanta" part of quantum mechanics is and you'll see the unimaginably small energy levels involved for quantum effects to be involved.
In fact, any of these snake oil things claiming to be based on quantum effects would likely require all the audio equipment to be cooled to near absolute zero for anything to be remotely happening in the quantum world.
It is something heating due to classical physics, e.g. current through a wire.
To be fair JC defends many(most) of these tweaks not just Bybee. We are just the pitchfork wielding villagers.
I hear you and have posed similar thoughts.
According to my experiments it does indeed seem that something 'extra' is embedded into recordings.
Rec and pb gear usually adds 'dirt', however this dirt can be altered if not substantially removed, revealling the original 'vibe'.
Really intrinsically quiet pb gear substantially does this.
Dan.
Actually I was happy that it finally moved to where it belongs, a snake oil thread in the lounge ..
They have been poisoning other more technical treads for too long.
Jan
- Status
- Not open for further replies.