John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good point:...

And was made years ago when John first brought this up. But he keeps regurgitating it.

In addition, in any drawn wire (even OHNO Continuous Cast is drawn) these coherent structures are worked out of existence by drawing.

Actually, Ohno developed his heated mold process for the continuous casting of fine wire and thin foils. But the companies that are making it (and marketing it pretty much exclusively to the "audiophile" community) cast rod and then draw it into wire.

se
 
Oh No

Actually, Ohno developed his heated mold process for the continuous casting of fine wire and thin foils. But the companies that are making it (and marketing it pretty much exclusively to the "audiophile" community) cast rod and then draw it into wire. se

Good to know, all of the current sources of Ohno CC seem to be drawn...

Also, to those interested in the Beveridge ES line source speakers, note I made a spelling error originally, the correct spelling is Beveridge, and Harold Beveridge's son Rick is now owner and seemingly still in business in some fashion (index), although it is hard to get information.

Howie

Howard Hoyt
CE - WXYC-FM 89.3
UNC Chapel Hill, NC
www.wxyc.org
 
Good point: While these grain boundaries certainly exist, any effect due to them would only be observed when the entirety of the current flow had to cross them (<10uM). This means the makers of those nasty 8-legged bug lookin things (apologies to SW) may have to deal with them.

Not really, IC thin film resistors are VERY thin and the performance is there, no excess noise, sub-ppm linearity (the thin film "target" is very secret sauce).

IBM has a 15 metal interconnect layer process with some layers so thin IIRC resistance can be >.1 Ohm/square.
 
Thin Film performance

Not really, IC thin film resistors are VERY thin and the performance is there, no excess noise, sub-ppm linearity (the thin film "target" is very secret sauce).

IBM has a 15 metal interconnect layer process with some layers so thin IIRC resistance can be >.1 Ohm/square.

That is as I suspected by my own experience with thin films, I was just trying to get you to add your own experience to the dialog, Scott...my apologies. I'll just ask next time.

And it's true about secret target alloys. For several years we ran a "gold" target to metalize CDs which we offered at greatly reduced prices relative to what we charged for actual gold metalize. I had a couple of other replicators ask what it was and told them it was "gold looking" which pissed them off. I had noticed the new Euro coins looked like a nice light gold color which resisted oxidizing pretty well, so I paid my target manufacturer to purchase a large round of the Euro-gold alloy (90%Cu+5%Al+5%Zn) and make me some targets with it. It gave us a nice advantage for a while... My techs were happy as well, they hated having armed guards and cameras around every time they ran or serviced a metalizer with an $80,000 chunk of gold in it. They were sure they were going to be knocked off by some idiot stealing metalizer shield debris...

Howie

Howard Hoyt
CE - WXYC-FM 89.3
UNC Chapel Hill, NC
www.wxyc.org
 
I come from 'listening first' and the listening experiences of my colleagues. THEN I try to find the reason (in normal physics) for their experience. This is what I found. I did the search, the rest of you can learn from the results, if you wish.

And you do that under the delusion that our subjective perceptions are some unerring reflection of the objective reality around us. Which is why you'll never make any meaningful contribution outside the stagnant backwaters of "high-end" audio.

Seriously, you're like the child who puts a tooth under his pillow at night, finds a quarter there the following morning, and concludes there must be a Tooth Fairy. I mean hey, his "colleagues" all found quarters under their pillows too when they did it.

se
 
The progression is, experiencing how impressive music reproduction can be when everything is in alignment, how it makes the normal standard, accepted by most, as being quite pathetic in comparison. Hopefully, this can be repeated several times to drive the message well and truly home.

Then, a decision is made as to whether that above ordinary replay was due to a 'magic' ingredient - e.g. a hideously expensive, energy gulping amplifier, or a completely OTT speaker - and therefore cannot be repeated unless that blessed component is part of the mix - or, as in my case, that this is actually nothing more than a fortuitous combination of audio elements, sufficient to get one over the hurdles that normally prevent audio reproduction subjectively sounding that good. If one takes the latter option, then the audio world opens up - you know the experience can be repeated at any time, merely by making enough effort to engineer a competent system ...
 
Last edited:
Barrie Gilbert said it was his gold reference, at the time too expensive.

Good ole Barrie Gilbert ..:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sATM6gi7bn8

The most impressing music reproduction I have ever heard came from Dr Forsells (Air Ref) Beveridge system. Fantastic. He played them really loud all night long to the rest of hes families joy.

This about sums it up, every comment on them over the last 30+ yrs has been about the same, including those from Mr Audio Critic, where i first read about them many moons ago ...

Repair :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxv4Oja_8Sg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.