MOAP is something completely different. As i understand it a layer of not many molecules thick of something like metal-ceramic is deposited/sputtered onto the cone surface.
Variations on this would be anodizing the cone, or the technics that turn surface molecules into ceramic (ie infinity)
dave
Variations on this would be anodizing the cone, or the technics that turn surface molecules into ceramic (ie infinity)
dave
Lots of trade-offs go into cone vibration control. You gain some and you lose some. The important thing is to gain more than you lose. Not an easy thing to do, and quite often you hit some manufacturing limits. For example, I would like to have control of non-uniform anodizing thickness. If you do it well, the cost goes through the roof.
I see 5 years on, sreten continues his self-serving campaign against enabl and BudP.
rgds, Pano.
The lack of any social skill or relevancy is unbelievable.
You really have to live in a different world not to find it terminally boring.
I fail to see how bringing to light the questionable "results" of Enabl as being self serving
Either BudP can show proof or he can't.So far he hasn't.I see 5 years on, sreten continues his self-serving campaign against enabl and BudP.
rgds, Pano.
The lack of any social skill or relevancy is unbelievable.
You really have to live in a different world not to find it terminally boring.
Hi,
Yes. Five years on.
The patent is utter garbage, and the only self-serving person I can
see in this affair is BudP. Why should I care ? I can't stand BS.
The level of absolute nonsense in the subjective thread is beyond
the pale, you'd have to be seriously intellectually challenged not
to have serious problems with the sort of claims made there.
Social skills and the like are not relevant, and anyone who thinks
they are is simply incapable of engaging in real a technical debate.
Anyone who thinks personal comments are relevant is wrong.
rgds, sreten.
Guys, take it down a couple of notches or we'll be handing out a lot of infractions. Attack ideas, not each other, failing that I would be more than delighted to provide any continuing rule breakers with a long vacation. This isn't the school yard.
That's a real shame and goes to show the dangers of "mods" to a speaker cone.Too late to fix what happened to your cone.Fostex use really thin cones, it's a wonder they don't warp due to changes in humidity anyways.
I'd like to say that i used the same solution on My super 8 audio nirvanas and cast frame 10 audio nirvanas with perfect results. I guess the fostexs are more sensitive to this treatment . something that might be documented ,what not to do ...... as ugly as they look , they sound great. LOL. thank god they are not the price of lowthers or feastrex................ordered a new pair
I had a similar issue with FE167 (different experiment). The fellow i gave them to massaged them into much better shape... if you email i can hook you up with him, they may be recoverable.
dave
I think this is prudent.
We split the threads to keep the fire and brimstone here, and the useful information for the 'doers' in the other. Those who argue vehemently against the merits of EnABL have mostly respected the intention of the split threads, and the mods have kindly maintained this through appropriate moderation.
Mods, would you consider moving this latest stuff to the other thread?
Cheers,
Alex
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.