How to build the F5

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
The chipamp PSU board is quite nice. Here is a photo of it with a 400VA transformer in a F5 I built -

bGTPSUPCB.jpg


Don't go insane on the amount of capacitance. 15,000 - 20,000uf per cap (x12) is a bunch!!!!

Do get 35A TO-220 diodes. They must have heatsinks. It's probably easier (although more expensive) to use the PCB bridge instead of external bridges.
 

6L6

Moderator
Joined 2010
Paid Member
The arrangement of ground and single rectifier is copied from the Aleph amps.

Nelson did it it this way, I believe it is worth copying. It is also the way that it's connected natively to that particular PCB.

It has no audible hum on the outputs, and if I remember, the next time I get my hands on the amp I will scope out what residual, inaudible hum there might be.

I would suggest that if you want to assess it's suitability for your use, you should try it yourself and see what you think. It's quite nice. Are you building an F5?
 
Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
the question was regarding chipamps PSU boards. wether to use the onboard rectifiers, or external rectifiers to get dual rectifier.

Only addressing the "dual Mono" using two power supplys, could be done with two of the chip amp boards WITH on board if that suits you better, same thing. could also be done with chip amp boards wired to external like I did.

Russellc
 
Last edited:
two channels amplifiers (both dual mono and conventional stereo) do not perform consistently well with regard to hum when a normal stereo source component is connected with two interconnects. A single rectifier shared between the two channels generally performs better than a pair of rectifiers each dedicated to it's channel.
Twin single rectifiers off a common pair of secondaries generally performs worse than all other versions. It's down to the multiplicity of ground loops.

I have found that dual rectifiers from their own isolated secondaries dedicated to each amplifier channel generally perform better than the other options. But I still find that a true mono block performs better than any two channel amplifier, with all the different grounding options I have experimented with.

But I am still listening out for a better way to implement two channel amplifiers.
 
two channels amplifiers (both dual mono and conventional stereo) do not perform consistently well with regard to hum when a normal stereo source component is connected with two interconnects. A single rectifier shared between the two channels generally performs better than a pair of rectifiers each dedicated to it's channel.
Twin single rectifiers off a common pair of secondaries generally performs worse than all other versions. It's down to the multiplicity of ground loops.

I have found that dual rectifiers from their own isolated secondaries dedicated to each amplifier channel generally perform better than the other options. But I still find that a true mono block performs better than any two channel amplifier, with all the different grounding options I have experimented with.

But I am still listening out for a better way to implement two channel amplifiers.

i agree with most. but one way to improve a dual mono, is to use a dedicated star ground to each ch. and let them go to earth thru a resistor or NTC.
thats what i did on my F5. like this.
 

Attachments

  • Dual mono earth.png
    Dual mono earth.png
    17.5 KB · Views: 244