The average current drain is set by the resistor from the source of the fet to the negative supply. I usually aim for 5 to 10 mA to limit dissipation in the mosfets. If your positive voltage supply is lower, then you can increase the current to improve the dynamics a bit. I have found no benefit to going beyond 20 or 25 mA. These current numbers are per channel.
For my test amps, I use an isolation transformer with two 120 volt secondaries which I put in series. With a bridge rectifier and filter I get a +/- 160 volt supply for PowerDrive. That works well.
For my test amps, I use an isolation transformer with two 120 volt secondaries which I put in series. With a bridge rectifier and filter I get a +/- 160 volt supply for PowerDrive. That works well.
Thanks!!! I will be using the regulator from diyhifisuppy, that has -120v supply. For the positive suppy of the powerdrive i will use a secondary winding of the main transformer. As I will have it custom made, i will request 50mA 150v. That should make.
We will see what will come out.
Davide
We will see what will come out.
Davide
Another question: what filament voltage are you aiming for the 5842 tubes ? I notice that with the current arrangement it is below 6.3 V
I aim for 6.3 volts. The 5842 is the most variable tube that I have ever used and that includes the heater current. I have seen 5.4 to 6.7 volts with the stock configuration. The 5842 heater voltage depends on the power line voltage and tube current. I usually just tweak R3 as needed.
If you were building the ultimate amplifier with off board power supplies a good DC source for the 5842's might be a good idea. I did that in my 845SE amp which used a Tubelab SE for the driver.
As I am pretty flexible with the power supply at this stage I was thinking something like this.
The module that I am using needs the rectifier, so I am using the rectifier on board, mainly to hold the tube in place.
The output of the module will be +400V and -120V. The B+ from the module should be mainly ripple free.
I will have a separate supply CRC for the power drive.
Now I can feed the B+ directly to the OT and feed the board with the power drive supply of around 200V. Like this the drivers and the power drive will share the supply, and I will reduce the heat also on the CCS.
The disadvantage is that the driver will not have a supply as clean as the power tube, but I noticed that the CCS makes his own work to reduce ripple.
Am I correct ? Does it make sense ?
For the filament, I will use the on-board supply for the 300B, feed with something around 5.5VAC and a separate PSU feeding 6.3 V 0.8 A regulated to the drives. I will have an ACof around 7VAC.
Please comment on my plan. Maybe I am missing something.
Thanks,
Davide
The module that I am using needs the rectifier, so I am using the rectifier on board, mainly to hold the tube in place.
The output of the module will be +400V and -120V. The B+ from the module should be mainly ripple free.
I will have a separate supply CRC for the power drive.
Now I can feed the B+ directly to the OT and feed the board with the power drive supply of around 200V. Like this the drivers and the power drive will share the supply, and I will reduce the heat also on the CCS.
The disadvantage is that the driver will not have a supply as clean as the power tube, but I noticed that the CCS makes his own work to reduce ripple.
Am I correct ? Does it make sense ?
For the filament, I will use the on-board supply for the 300B, feed with something around 5.5VAC and a separate PSU feeding 6.3 V 0.8 A regulated to the drives. I will have an ACof around 7VAC.
Please comment on my plan. Maybe I am missing something.
Thanks,
Davide
So I think I will use the separate supply only for the mosfet. I set on 160 VAC 220uF 270R 220uF. Does it make sense here to have something like PP caps at the output, let's say 10uF or something smaller.
Additionally, I have two ammeter to connect instead of the resistors. Now they will be directly in the signal path. Should they bother me ?
I plan to connect one pp cap for each channel right at the OT. I think this should mitigate any possible negative effect of the meter. Am I correct ?
Thanks,
Davide
Additionally, I have two ammeter to connect instead of the resistors. Now they will be directly in the signal path. Should they bother me ?
I plan to connect one pp cap for each channel right at the OT. I think this should mitigate any possible negative effect of the meter. Am I correct ?
Thanks,
Davide
Sometime you think you understand things, and experience shows you that you did not.
The question is general on the CCS: I put the plate of the driver at 175 V with 10mA flowing through the tube. From the specs of the semiconductor I understood that it needs few volts of headroom to work, so I thought 200V would be enough.
But it is not the case, as if I don't raise the supply voltage up to almost 300 V I get visible positive clipping, well before a 175 V swing.
Can somebody explain this ? I thought that in this configuration the plate could swing between 0 and 175 V.
Thanks and sorry for my lack of basis.
D.
The question is general on the CCS: I put the plate of the driver at 175 V with 10mA flowing through the tube. From the specs of the semiconductor I understood that it needs few volts of headroom to work, so I thought 200V would be enough.
But it is not the case, as if I don't raise the supply voltage up to almost 300 V I get visible positive clipping, well before a 175 V swing.
Can somebody explain this ? I thought that in this configuration the plate could swing between 0 and 175 V.
Thanks and sorry for my lack of basis.
D.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- More Vendors...
- Tubelab
- My Tubelab SE unanswered question