Question regarding the LM317T

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I am putting together a simple regulated 3 amp variable voltage power supply, and I am planning on using 3 LM317T's on a shared heatsink.

Is there any traps I need to know or will wiring three in parallel be fine? When the LM317T is heatsinked, it is rated for 1.5 amps, so I figure 3 should be overrated sufficiently for 3 amps, but I am unsure if I should be careful how I wire them in parallel, to avoid thermal runaway or current imbalance.
 
Last edited:
Administrator
Joined 2007
Paid Member
That doesn't sound like a great idea tbh and you could end up with stability issues and more basic issues of the regulators 'fighting' each other due to differences in voltage tolerances.

The data sheet shows the recommended method of adding an external series pass device, however the device used is an odd ball:

http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm395.pdf

There are probably more modern solutions than this... but paralleling three LM317's to make a variable supply would be a no no in my book.
 

Attachments

  • Annotation 2019-05-23 195620.jpg
    Annotation 2019-05-23 195620.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 372
That doesn't sound like a great idea tbh and you could end up with stability issues and more basic issues of the regulators 'fighting' each other
That's what I was worried about. Yeah, a power transistor supplying the actual current sounds like a good idea.

I did find this just now, though:
Power supply 4.5 A with 3 LM317 in parallel - Power Supply Circuits

The english isn't very good, but it does seem to warn about potential problems if you over drive the power supply.
 
Last edited:
3 voltage regulators parallel is a dumb idea in general. Parallel the pass transistors, not the voltage source. Follow the pass transistors with emitter resistors, about 0.22 ohms or so, to share the current.
I used a dumb 1.5 W zener diode (protected by current limit resistors to limit wattage) feeding bases of 5 TIP142 darlingtons to make a 6.5 A voltage regulator. Heat sink was off of a generation 3 PC CPU. Runs daily about 14 hours in my ST120 hifi amp. About a 2 v loss from the nominal zener voltage to the actual output voltage. Eliminates the 2n2905 and the two resistors in post #3. TIP142 are very cost effective, about $1 for 1.2 amp safe current.
 
Last edited:
I recall an Elektor design of some decades ago where they put five LM317's in parallel. They had current balancing resistors in their output lines, and either voltage control and current limitation were outsourced to a pair of opamps. Hence the LM's were degradated to plain pass elements :rolleyes:.
Best regards!
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.