I have been thinking lately a lot about a concept where ribbon would not be flat but a tube instead. Hanging between magnets as free as possible. Only attached to elastic wires on top.
It´s not planar magnetic but more like tubular magnetic
+ Tube is more rigid than flat ribbon.
+ Curved surface won´t get noisy wrinkles as easily.
+ Air gaps can be smaller since there is a place for a steel rod inside the tube!
+ Therefore a tube can be wider.
+ It´s polar response is still pretty flat.
- Tube resonances are a bit problematic. However a free hanging tube is not forced to twist as much as Linaeum tweeter, some stuffing can be placed inside the tube (not touching the tube) and surface joints can be cut to form a kind of diffusor for surface acoustic waves. These can help a bit if internal damping of used material is not enough.
I think a thin paper & coil wires would be a good stating point. Works somehow...
It´s not planar magnetic but more like tubular magnetic
+ Tube is more rigid than flat ribbon.
+ Curved surface won´t get noisy wrinkles as easily.
+ Air gaps can be smaller since there is a place for a steel rod inside the tube!
+ Therefore a tube can be wider.
+ It´s polar response is still pretty flat.
- Tube resonances are a bit problematic. However a free hanging tube is not forced to twist as much as Linaeum tweeter, some stuffing can be placed inside the tube (not touching the tube) and surface joints can be cut to form a kind of diffusor for surface acoustic waves. These can help a bit if internal damping of used material is not enough.
I think a thin paper & coil wires would be a good stating point. Works somehow...
Ok lets take this from the top.
It will have a high mass.
So efficiency will be low.
Tubes have bending moments - and as they are stiffer, and the mass is higher, as a consequence the resonance will be bigger and uglier.
Having said all that, I have contemplated a multiple parallel magnet wire stator, but the magnetic circuit gets tricky. Especially to avoid the obligatory line array combing that would arise from such a package.
An interesting thought, but do try it and see.
Owen
It will have a high mass.
So efficiency will be low.
Tubes have bending moments - and as they are stiffer, and the mass is higher, as a consequence the resonance will be bigger and uglier.
Having said all that, I have contemplated a multiple parallel magnet wire stator, but the magnetic circuit gets tricky. Especially to avoid the obligatory line array combing that would arise from such a package.
An interesting thought, but do try it and see.
Owen
= 3.14x more mass compared to a ribbon of the same thickness.
Don´t make sense if the tube has small diameter. But if midranges need to be produced and therefore tube must be wider (>1") then perhaps... The wider tube is, the less motion is needed and therefore air gap between magnets and internal steel core can also be made thinner. Steel core can be something like wire mesh combined with stuffing material needed for damping high frequencies.
Possible yes, but a tube can also be made of thinner material than a planar: Tube is rigid and immune against wrinkles.
I am actually looking for a line array
One other interesting thing is that if the whole surface of the tube carry current then we have basically "infinitely long voice coil": Almost all magnetic flux goes through the wire and motion is very linear. A kind of push-pull structure deleting even order harmonics. And slightly varying field vector can actually compensate bending moments a bit. Electromagnetic force spread the tube where mass and momentum squeeze it. Partially.
Eddy currents and sensitivity are another story...
A 5 micron tube. Good luck finding one, and better luck getting it shipped.
Not quite - It is slightly more rigid than the equivalent rod of the same section - this pushes the resonance up and also the Q.
The tube would be a pure line array in one dimension, but due to efficiency loss, it would need to be paralleled - and that is a more normal 'multidriver' line complete with a full set of undesirable side effects - combing, restricted off axis response etc. etc.
However, this could be a good way to get a bass/midbass package with similar sonic character to a 'normal' ribbon - the ferquency of operation making design and build more straightforward, and avoiding the 'nasty' side effects of a high power low frequency ribbon.
A mockup could be made using plumbing copper pipe, some reasonable magnets, and some steel bar.
The center 'flux bridge' does not need to be a rod - a flat bar will do nicely.
I'll see what I can mock up, and blast it to get an FR (and a measure of relative efficiency)... but that may take a while, as I am time poor...
Do build your own prototype, and report back.
Owen
A 5 micron tube. Good luck finding one, and better luck getting it shipped.
There is no such thing available... Isn´t there?
As long as it´s tubular magnetic (wires glued on a foil) then glue can also be used to make a tube out of foil. No big sonic issue. It´s already not perfect.
Exactly. Getting good high frequency response is tuning, failing, tuning, failing, tuning, failing, ... But we don´t know if we don´t try.
Copper pipe... Uh... Too heavy...
Or acoustically open mesh with some stuffing? Somehow I don´t believe that hollow tube without any damping material is good enough.
I'll see what I can mock up, and blast it to get an FR (and a measure of relative efficiency)... but that may take a while, as I am time poor...
Do build your own prototype, and report back.
Thanks. That´s what I liked to have with this topic. I also have lack of time (weddings coming etc) so any new findings from as many people as possible is great.
Hi,
Yes the copper would be heavy, but it will move the overal system resonance lower. Especially as the system compliance will be high.
And most importantly, its what I have around at the moment.
Thought of the moment - gently flatten the tube - it'll work harden the sharper corners on the elipse that is produced, making it stiffer still.!
I'll see what I can bodge together as a prototype.
Have fun
Owen
Yes the copper would be heavy, but it will move the overal system resonance lower. Especially as the system compliance will be high.
And most importantly, its what I have around at the moment.
Thought of the moment - gently flatten the tube - it'll work harden the sharper corners on the elipse that is produced, making it stiffer still.!
I'll see what I can bodge together as a prototype.
Have fun
Owen
tubular tweeter
Long ago I began assembling this tweeter, but never got past the one third stage.
I took plumbing pvc pipe drilled it with 3/8 inch holes. Stuff it with cotton. Glue a wire winding around the pipe but trying not to cover any holes. fix your spacers to the pipe. My thought was to use several runs of vcr tape for the charged membrane. Now you have to find a slightly bigger pvc pipe (with holes drilled in it) and a wire glued in the inside.
Any ideas on wheather this would work?
Paul
Long ago I began assembling this tweeter, but never got past the one third stage.
I took plumbing pvc pipe drilled it with 3/8 inch holes. Stuff it with cotton. Glue a wire winding around the pipe but trying not to cover any holes. fix your spacers to the pipe. My thought was to use several runs of vcr tape for the charged membrane. Now you have to find a slightly bigger pvc pipe (with holes drilled in it) and a wire glued in the inside.
Any ideas on wheather this would work?
Paul
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.