Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Vas, cms, etc... for Dipoles
Vas, cms, etc... for Dipoles
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th February 2006, 12:51 AM   #21
EC8010 is offline EC8010  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
EC8010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
I don't understand why anyone should be interested in Vas for a driver on an open baffle; Vas is a parameter that is relevant when dealing with boxes. On an open baffle, the only important parameters are fs, Qts, and efficiency. As a sweeping statement, output falls at 6dB/octave as frequency falls from an open baffle, and the frequency at which that happens is inversely proportional to the size of the baffle, so the primary consideration is the size of the baffle. In practice, there are ripples in the response caused by the peaks and nulls from in and out-of-phase addition. A bigger baffle makes the difference between the peak and null frequencies smaller, so it makes the amplitude of the peaks and nulls smaller. That's why a big baffle is better than a little one. I have a sneaking suspicion that there may be a critical minimum size of baffle related to the ear's FFT process and low frequency discrimination.

Once the applied frequency falls to fs, the 12db/octave attenuation of the driver is added to that of the baffle, or, to put it another way, there's no point in using a driver with a lower fs than the baffle response (equalised or not). Reduced fs always forces reduced sensitivity.

The graph in the earlier post demonstrated the effect of Qts. It's much easier to electronically equalise lower values of Qts.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference...
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2006, 06:43 AM   #22
Raka is offline Raka  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Raka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Close to Oistrakh
It seems that everyone wants to talk about how to equalize a dipole, well the information is welcome, but is not the point.

Keltic, thanks for the link, it's very interesting the Vas value. In the AES paper Vas it's mentioned, but in a generic way and related to system efficiency.
What intrigues me is what happens to the cone modes if they are not damped by a closed box, and how to measure/valuate this effect.
__________________
What is beyond the speaker?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Vas, cms, etc... for DipolesHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dipoles ? LennyK Multi-Way 111 21st September 2006 04:12 PM
Dipoles (continued)... Nuuk Multi-Way 10 25th February 2006 08:52 PM
3-way or 4-way dipoles? mazeroth Multi-Way 0 25th January 2006 07:37 AM
SPL max and dipoles XLS Raka Multi-Way 11 21st July 2004 09:34 PM
'T' baffle dipoles sfdoddsy Multi-Way 2 15th January 2003 11:46 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki