Calculating bends in a tapered TL
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
bwbass
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Oct 2004
Calculating bends in a tapered TL

I think I'm finally ready to start making sawdust on my first TL design, but I wanted to get some opinions on my method of calculating the line length through the bends.

What I'm building is a small sub using the Adire Koda 8. I've come up with a 67" line with a 2.5 x Sd : .3 x Sd taper, with the driver mounted at the closed end of the line. Modeled in MJK's MathCAD worksheets, I get an F3 around 31Hz or so, and with some heavy stuffing in the first couple of segments, response looks pretty smooth out to 120Hz.

OK, the issue is, how to best calculate the line length through the bend while maintaining a constant taper. After thinking about it for a while, I decided that the best solution would be to treat the path of the line around the corners as a section of an equiangular (logarithmic) spiral, since the width of the cabinet needs to increase as a linear function of the length of the line as it does in the straight segments. I built up a spreadsheet to calculate the total line length this way from the start and end cross sections and the length of the first straight segment, and then fiddled with the input till the line came out to the desired 67".

I drew the whole mess up in cad, and threw in a couple of 45 degree corner reflectors at points tangent to the spiral bends.

It seems to me that this would be the best way to maintain a constant taper, but it's based on the assumption that the sound waves will follow the path of "best fit" as the line narrows, rather than making a 90 degree turn in the corners. It seems logical to me, but I'm interested in what others have to say about this.
Attached Images
 koda tl.jpg (10.9 KB, 333 views)

 29th November 2004, 11:12 AM #2 MJK   Account disabled at member's request   Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Clifton Park, NY Hi bwbass, Looks good to me. I have found that for a single fold TL that the geometry of the bend is not so important for the first few standing waves. Bob Brines has also demonstarted that the 45 degree reflectors have very little impact at the lower frequencies of a TL. Since you are building a sub, this should make the bend a fairly insensitive variable in your enclosure. I think your corner geometry will work well and I would not spend too much more time refining the design of the fold. Hope that helps,
 29th November 2004, 04:06 PM #3 bwbass   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2004 Thanks, Martin. I looked at Bob Brines' data on the effects of corner reflectors, but it seems to me all that this shows is that the discontinuity in cross section caused by a square corner does not affect the line length "seen" by the driver. Therefore there must be a "correct" line path through a rectangular bend, regardless of corner reflectors. If I had chosen to calculate my line with a square-cornered line path through the bends, the length through the bend would have been about 27% longer (4/pi), and therefore I would have made the width of the line on the other end of the bend larger, since it's further down the line. I would think that the discontinuity in the taper before and after the bend would have a noticeable effect, moreso than the presence or absence of corner reflectors. If there's one correct way that the line length is "seen" through the bend, the other methods must cause a deviation from the modeled response. So which way is right?
 29th November 2004, 04:30 PM #4 MJK   Account disabled at member's request   Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Clifton Park, NY bwbass, If I take the sketch you have provided, assume it is dimensionally accurate for your design, eliminate the corner reflectors, then calculate a new path that is based on a square corner, how much does the total calculated length change? My guess, less than 10%. If your "physics" line length is within 10% of what your design drawings show, you are probably more accurate then the other approximations you are making in the design that you may not even realize you are making. Please don't overthink a small detail when other variables in the design produce a much larger error.
 29th November 2004, 05:46 PM #5 bwbass   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2004 Martin, thank you for all you help and advice. I certainly don't want to start a fight over making more work for myself! I just thought the topic was worthy of discussion... of course there are greater variables involved that are harder to quantify or control - my thinking is that since this is a purely geometric problem, once a methodology is established, this one element can be quantified and accounted for. You are correct that the change in the length of the line through the bend is around 10 - 11% between my spiral and a rectangular model. Overall change amounts to about 3% over the total line. Doesn't seem like much, but another way of looking at it is that if the rectangular model is correct, then the spiral model is two inches too short and has an abrupt .25" stairstep in the taper halfway down the line. Or vise-versa if the spiral model is correct. My copy of MathCAD explorer has mysteriously died, so I can't model a line with this discontinuity at present. I wonder if anyone would like to try a model comparison using tl sections and post results. (a generic driver would be fine, as long as the taper ratio is similar.) MJK, I know you're too busy to do this yourself, I'm hoping someone else will jump in. Anyone?
 29th November 2004, 06:10 PM #6 MJK   Account disabled at member's request   Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Clifton Park, NY You should be able to download and install a new copy of MathCad Explorer from my site. I guess the link went dead a while back. Once the dead link was identified, I fixed it so it is working again.
bwbass
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Oct 2004
Thanks for the link - I did a system restore and re-installed it and it works fine.

Below is my design modeled as if the spiral path is correct...
Attached Images
 koda 8 spiral.gif (5.7 KB, 220 views)

bwbass
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Oct 2004
.... and then as if a rectangular-cornered path is correct (the line is about 2 inches longer through the bend, but cross sectional areas stay the same.)
Attached Images
 koda 8 rectangle.gif (5.7 KB, 206 views)

 30th November 2004, 05:24 AM #9 bwbass   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Oct 2004 The difference is small, but noticeable, especially in the higher frequency range (not important for this project, though.) Nothing ghastly, though, and I suppose the final result will undoubtably be influenced more by how evenly I fluff the stuffing in the line than by +/- 2 inches of line length.... Even so, if a tapered line had 3 or 4 bends in it the compounded discrepancy could be quite noticeable. So what is the most accurate method of determining the line length through the bends, disregarding the somewhat minor practical value of using one method over another?
MJK
Account disabled at member's request

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
bwbass,

Quote:
 The difference is small, but noticeable, especially in the higher frequency range (not important for this project, though.)
Agreed, but the assumption in the worksheet that the driver and open end are coincident is a much bigger source of error then the small inaccuracy in length. Think about how the high frequency resposne might change if the driver and open end were modeled 30 inches apart. This is the kind of thing I was emphasizing yesterday with respect ot other sources of errors.

Quote:
 Even so, if a tapered line had 3 or 4 bends in it the compounded discrepancy could be quite noticeable. So what is the most accurate method of determining the line length through the bends, disregarding the somewhat minor practical value of using one method over another?
Agreed again, this is why I do have not designed many multi-fold TL's. At some point modeling the fold will become more important. When I am worried that my MathCad model may not be accurately predicting the first mode I double check it with an ANSYS acoustic FEM model of the air in the enclosure. After calculating the natural frequencies and mode shapes in ANSYS, I revisit how I modeled the line length in MathCad and make adjustments to reflect the ANSYS results. If ANSYS shows a corner is being "shorted", then I remodel in MathCad to match the FEM path result. Typically I have found my MathCda models to be very close to the ANSYS predictions up to the point where modes across the line area start to occur (~ 500 Hz for the lines I have modeled and built).

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Room Acoustics & Mods     Music     diyAudio.com Articles     Car Audio     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Puppetnation Multi-Way 3 28th March 2008 01:52 PM philpope Subwoofers 0 31st July 2007 02:02 PM lndm Multi-Way 3 1st May 2006 10:22 PM Onur Multi-Way 6 29th October 2005 08:01 PM theChris Multi-Way 7 8th July 2003 05:59 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07 PM.