"Isn't it quite inefficient?"
Well, 88 dB sensitivity is not so bad. Of course, I would like 92 dB but many small woofers are less efficient (Seas W12= 85 dB)
Of course, frequency response is not all, that's why I am wondering if anyone used these or other Morel small woofers to know if they sound good...
F
Well, 88 dB sensitivity is not so bad. Of course, I would like 92 dB but many small woofers are less efficient (Seas W12= 85 dB)
Of course, frequency response is not all, that's why I am wondering if anyone used these or other Morel small woofers to know if they sound good...
F
I've been thinking about using two of these with a morel DMS37 in an mtm config for a while.
Time is a major problem for me, and I have not been in here for quite a while, but listening to my existing speakers lately has me thinking I should make some time
I've been told that if you flush mount the tweeter, and surface mount the mids it will be properly time aligned too....... and very good with a 1st order crossover...... try modelling two in (I think) a 10L sealed enclosure and see how you go (you will most likely decide you need a sub as well)
edit: try this for slightly more info http://www.eltimaudio.com/products/mw 144 datasheet.pdf
Tony.
Time is a major problem for me, and I have not been in here for quite a while, but listening to my existing speakers lately has me thinking I should make some time
I've been told that if you flush mount the tweeter, and surface mount the mids it will be properly time aligned too....... and very good with a 1st order crossover...... try modelling two in (I think) a 10L sealed enclosure and see how you go (you will most likely decide you need a sub as well)
edit: try this for slightly more info
http://www.eltimaudio.com/products/mw 144 datasheet.pdfTony.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.