• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Want to build 2a3 amp for old radio

Status
Not open for further replies.
I Want to build 2a3 amp for an old am radio and maybe mp3 player. Fidelity goal is minimal due to sources. Speaker will be mid sized full range in a box. COST is the key. Thinking pp 2a3 with 3 or more watts. Looking for suggestions on simple existing designs that will not break the bank.
 
If cost is central to your considerations why on earth choose a 2A3 output tube? These are pricey, And even if you have one of these or particularly a pair...sell them on flea-bay as they are garnering pretty good $$$ and use the profits to finance a modest amp build based on an output stage that's a little less expensive. Think 6V6 based El Cheapo as found on this forum....JMTCW....
 
And for an AM radio isn't the frequency responce limited to about 6k?
So a cheap tube like the 6as7 with it's two triode sections and a small
toriod power transformer used as an output transformer might be a good
cheap way to go.
 
The 2A3 was not used in many early radios, as it was introduced rather late... (1933) a year after the 41 and 42 power pentodes, two years after the 47. It's main usage was in PA amps, 15W in AB2 P-P. Single-ended was almost never used - some high-end radios used P-P 2A3. For some circuits, see the 1934 Thordarson Sound Amplifier Manual on my website: http://www.audiophool.com/Misc/1934SoundAmp.pdf

A triode connected 2A5, 42 or 46 will cost less and give similar performance to a 2A3. A 56 or 76 as driver may not give enough gain - a 2A6 or 75 certainly could, though those require grid caps..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.