Using 4612 JBL drivers in new cabinet. Firing one driver rearward

I am considering making new cabinets for some very knocked around JBL 4612Bs those are the Baby cheek 2404 tweeter with a pair of 2118H 8" 16 ohm drivers in series.

My use is home theatre/ music and my idea for the cabinet is to make it taller but significantly narrower by firing one driver out the back and one forward. Crossover will be Marchand Electronic 4th order.

This would result in an easier to live with cabinet and I am not certain how the dipolar nature will sound. Will I need a rear firing tweeter too? I will be integrating these with a pair of Subs that I am yet to source.

How will this work? Thoughts?
Regards Onslo
 
My use is home theatre/ music and my idea for the cabinet is to make it taller but significantly narrower by firing one driver out the back and one forward. Crossover will be Marchand Electronic 4th order.

This would result in an easier to live with cabinet and I am not certain how the dipolar nature will sound.
"Dipolar" would mean you wire the rear woofer reverse polarity from the front.
That would result in a "figure of 8" pattern with nulls on either side, a signifigant reduction in low frequency output, and sound very dependent on the reflected sound from the rear wall.
If wired in polarity, the output would be monopole, but sound very dependent on what is reflected from the rear wall. The distance from the room walls will determine the peak and null frequencies.
Will I need a rear firing tweeter too?
If you want the reflected sound to have much content above ~4.5kHz, yes.
I will be integrating these with a pair of Subs that I am yet to source.

How will this work? Thoughts?
The 2402's really shouldn't be crossed much below 4kHz, it's acoustic response drops off below 5kHz, ~-12dB @3kHz. It's (expensive) tiny aluminum annular diaphragm will shatter at relatively low SPL if crossed lower. Below 2 kHz it's input power should be limited to 5 watts (6.3 V RMS) or less.
Screen Shot 2025-05-23 at 5.17.41 PM.png

The 4612B was designed more towards stage use than HiFi..
4612B.png

The 4612B runs one of the 8" "full range", no crossover at all, the second has a series coil to roll off some of it's highs, a "2.5 way" crossover of sorts.
I'd suggest running the rolled off 8" below the "full range" 8" on the front of the cabinet for a home theater or music presentation similar to what it was mixed for, whether you use active or passive crossovers or not.

Anyway, you could wire one of the cabinets reverse polarity (swap leads on a 1/4" plug) and point it backwards to get a rough idea of dipole radiation sound in your room. Cover the tweeter with some foam or a pillow to hear without.

Art
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Onslo
My use is home theatre/ music and my idea for the cabinet is to make it taller but significantly narrower by firing one driver out the back and one forward...
... I am not certain how the dipolar nature will sound. Will I need a rear firing tweeter too?
Dipole/bipole loudspeaker needs two complete pairs of woofer/tweeter combos - one in frot, the other behind.
But dipole/bipole loudspeakers are not good solution for front LCR loudspeakers in a home theatre setup - you need a conventional, front-firing loudspeaker, with two woofers in front (vertically one over other), plus the tweeter in front.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onslo
"Dipolar" would mean you wire the rear woofer reverse polarity from the front.
That would result in a "figure of 8" pattern with nulls on either side, a signifigant reduction in low frequency output, and sound very dependent on the reflected sound from the rear wall.
If wired in polarity, the output would be monopole, but sound very dependent on what is reflected from the rear wall. The distance from the room walls will determine the peak and null frequencies.

If you want the reflected sound to have much content above ~4.5kHz, yes.

The 2402's really shouldn't be crossed much below 4kHz, it's acoustic response drops off below 5kHz, ~-12dB @3kHz. It's (expensive) tiny aluminum annular diaphragm will shatter at relatively low SPL if crossed lower. Below 2 kHz it's input power should be limited to 5 watts (6.3 V RMS) or less.

The 4612B was designed more towards stage use than HiFi..

The 4612B runs one of the 8" "full range", no crossover at all, the second has a series coil to roll off some of it's highs, a "2.5 way" crossover of sorts.
I'd suggest running the rolled off 8" below the "full range" 8" on the front of the cabinet for a home theater or music presentation similar to what it was mixed for, whether you use active or passive crossovers or not.

Anyway, you could wire one of the cabinets reverse polarity (swap leads on a 1/4" plug) and point it backwards to get a rough idea of dipole radiation sound in your room. Cover the tweeter with some foam or a pillow to hear without.

Art
Thanks Art, this is great information and I appreciate the effort you have gone to help. I think I will abandon the idea of rear firing one driver and try them as a 2.5 way vertical cabinet. It is still a fairly small enclosure. Any suggestions for subs? I am thinking I might go with a pair of isobarik subs to keep the cabinets small.
 
No need to go isobarik for small subs with the speaker parameters easily available this century.

Decide how loud and how low you want the subs to go to determine the displacement required.
Small boxes will require more power and equalization to extend down low.
The pair of 4612B could do around 114dB SPL at 100Hz with only ~10 watts each.
Small subs will require a lot more power (+10 to +20dB, 100 to 1000 watts each) to achieve that SPL.
This piston excursion calculator makes it easy to see how much displacement is required (disregarding room gain) for sealed subs:
http://www.baudline.com/erik/bass/xmaxer.html
Screen Shot 2025-05-23 at 10.19.47 PM.png

It is surprising to hear how much musical content there is below 40Hz, and movie soundtracks often extend into the single digit range.
As you can see, takes about eight 12" drivers to equal the SPL of two if your goal is 20 Hz rather than 40 Hz, while a pair of 21" could do the same SPL at 20Hz with a bit more excursion.

That said, 3 or 4 smaller subs spread around the room can often give much smoother in-room response than a pair of larger subs.

Art
 
Last edited:
Thanks Art and Sonce. It's been a while since I visited this forum. Used it a Loy when I was doing my Purifi speakers but have been absent since. It is great to have so much good advice.
I am on the hunt for four 12" subs to complement these. Maybe since Arts advice I will not go isobarik but stick with sealed and some eq. Starting my research now. I guess high sensitivity long throw is the go for a match. I don't care too much for getting down to 20hz, fast responsive bass with some slam is more important to me.
Many thanks Onslo
 
If you actually 'have your hands on' a pair of 14mH inductors as indicated in the circuit diagram above >
I have a very adventurous project for you to try >
1. You separate the "Lower (sub) Woofer" and its 14mH inductor from all other crossover components. This means the 'sub' will be its own independent
circuit connected to the amplifier. [ with the possibility of a series resistor needed ]
2. You mount the 'sub' Face to the rear of the speaker box. In this way, you slightly add some volume to the enclosure, rather than subtracting.
3. You add a 'blanket of 1cm felt' > glued to the interior of the wood cut-out > this makes the 'sub' think it is seeing a larger box.
This scenario could be called "an actively assisted rear port" OR "an actively assisted rear passive radiator" but with far more output >
Giving you SUB output
When such a design is located in the region of a room corner, a horn-loading effect can come into play greatly increasing Low Bass output.
[ a resistor or EQ may be required to customize/tame things ]
The Phase orientation/wiring of the rear driver WILL be immediately obvious when you get it right.
PS.
I have used this design, and it is quite amazing. [ driver & enclosure obviously dependent ]

  • Like
Reactions:presscot
Quote
Report

A

Audio>X

Member​

Joined 2013

3. You add a 'blanket of 1cm felt' > glued to the interior of the wood cut-out
I should have stipulated that this 1cm 'felt blanket' should hang like a curtain being attached/glued only at its top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Onslo
Thanks Audio>X I am not sure I fully comprehend this approach. Would the extension still not be limited to the Fs of the driver, which is pretty high ( can't recall exactly what). Do you have any links to arcticles on this or any sketches images? Very interesting I love to try something unusual. Onslo
 
Thanks Audio>X I am not sure I fully comprehend this approach. Would the extension still not be limited to the Fs of the driver, which is pretty high ( can't recall exactly what). Do you have any links to arcticles on this or any sketches images? Very interesting I love to try something unusual. Onslo
Yes, I do understand that your drivers do have rather high Fs and are identical.
I was really just re-posting 'Food for Thought'.
I was thinking that you could use both your 8" 16ohm drivers in parallel on a front baffle [ maybe too loud ? ] and then also incorporate a
rear mounted 10 or15" sub that has reasonably high efficiency and low Qts.
There are actually quite a few Car Subs @ reasonably low cost that can work well, so long as you use a very high value inductor with useful DCR.
Of coarse, you need an amplifier that is happy with a 4ohm load.
PS.
If your 8"s are too loud, then series wiring could be the way to go 🙂
 
Yes Audio>X they are monstrous drivers but doesn't look like they will suit this application as the ported enclosure calls at 200l and sealed box over 2000l. I am wanting a small enclosure so need to explore other options. However two of these in an isobarik install in 100l box would be useful.