What is the relationship between surface area, excursion, spl and the volume of air displaced by a speaker?
If you double the surface area of a speaker it produces +3dB, but a doubling of excursion produces +6dB even though in both cases the volume of air displaced has doubled.
Example-
SYSTEM 1
1 speaker with an effective surface area of 1000cm2 having 1 watt of power fed through it produces 90dB
Add another speaker with the same surface area and same power going through it, and the total combined output will be 93dB
2000cm2 of air displaced, 2 Watts of power = 93dB
SYSTEM 2
1 speaker with an effective surface area of 1000cm2 having 1 watt of power fed through it produces 90dB
If you were to then double the power going through the speaker to 2 Watts the total output will be 93dB
A doubling of power through a speaker increases the excursion by a factor of 1.41.
1410cm2 of air displaced, 2 Watts of power = 93dB
Can anybody give an answer as to why the volume of air displaced is different between the two systems but the spl is the same?
Am I missing something very simple?, are the figures above incorrect?
If you double the surface area of a speaker it produces +3dB, but a doubling of excursion produces +6dB even though in both cases the volume of air displaced has doubled.
Example-
SYSTEM 1
1 speaker with an effective surface area of 1000cm2 having 1 watt of power fed through it produces 90dB
Add another speaker with the same surface area and same power going through it, and the total combined output will be 93dB
2000cm2 of air displaced, 2 Watts of power = 93dB
SYSTEM 2
1 speaker with an effective surface area of 1000cm2 having 1 watt of power fed through it produces 90dB
If you were to then double the power going through the speaker to 2 Watts the total output will be 93dB
A doubling of power through a speaker increases the excursion by a factor of 1.41.
1410cm2 of air displaced, 2 Watts of power = 93dB
Can anybody give an answer as to why the volume of air displaced is different between the two systems but the spl is the same?
Am I missing something very simple?, are the figures above incorrect?
Member
Joined 2004
cm^2 = surface area
cm^3 = volume displaced.
The one variable of the equation that's missing is the woofer travel. This is HIGHLY dependent on the frequency.
cm^3 = volume displaced.
The one variable of the equation that's missing is the woofer travel. This is HIGHLY dependent on the frequency.
You are forgetting that in your 2 driver situation the surface area is 2000cm2 but the displacement is not going to be 2000cm2. It will be .707 of the displacement of a single driver producing the same spl level.
You also aren't considering the 3dB rise in radiating efficiency when using two drivers. In the case of system 1 with dual drivers and 2 watts input the output will rise to 96dB, not 93dB.
mart34 said:
Nope! Doubled area and same displacement gives +6 dB.
The equation for sound pressure (in pascals) is
p=U*rho0*f / (2*r)
where U is the volume flow in m3/s
rho0=1.2 kg/m3
f is the frequency in Hz
r is the distance
U is also equal to V*2*pi*f, where V is the volume of air displaced in m3.
To get from sound pressure (p) to sound pressure level (SPL)
SPL = 20*log10(p/pref);
where pref=0.00002 Pa
Free space assumed (4 pi).
Sorry to bump a dead thread.
www.linkwitzlab.com/spl_max1.xls
Why does SL say that 6 dB should be added for radiation into half-space vs full-space?
www.linkwitzlab.com/spl_max1.xls
Why does SL say that 6 dB should be added for radiation into half-space vs full-space?
The general assumption is that there will be a 6dB difference between LF level in half space vs. full space.
There are 2 factors involved. In half space the energy that typically goes into the back hemisphere is constrained to stay in the front. Secondly the air load on the woofer is doubled (radiation resistance). This factor gives a 3dB increase. The first factor gives a little less than 3dB, since most woofers will have some directivity, even at low frequencies.
In my experience the difference is usually about 4 1/2 dB from the 2 factors combined.
David S.
There are 2 factors involved. In half space the energy that typically goes into the back hemisphere is constrained to stay in the front. Secondly the air load on the woofer is doubled (radiation resistance). This factor gives a 3dB increase. The first factor gives a little less than 3dB, since most woofers will have some directivity, even at low frequencies.
In my experience the difference is usually about 4 1/2 dB from the 2 factors combined.
David S.
Why 6dB? It's very simple. An acoustic wave expanding into 4Pi space expands into twice the volume that it expands into in 2Pi space. This means the acoustic pressure in 2Pi space must be twice the acoustic pressure in 4Pi space. Thus the ration of 2Pi pressure to 4Pi pressure is 2. The SPL increase goes like 20 Log of the pressure ratio, 20 Log(2) = 6dB.
Hi thats a a very neat formula but if U is volume flow , then U=Surface*ExcursionMax*2*pi*f(Sd*Xmax*j*omega)?? so you are just derivating excursion with j*omega to get velocity is that correct?
Here is a formula for sound power Pac/Watt versus piston radius r/Meter, effective excursion a/Meter and frequency f/Hertz for half-space radiation, derived from Boxsim software: Pak=20*a^2*r^4*f^4.
For half-space radiation 1W Pac means 112dB at a distance of 1m.
For half-space radiation 1W Pac means 112dB at a distance of 1m.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.