Searching for the smallest Mms...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Peavey 1508-8 HE BWX in ferrite and neodymium have ~53g mms

overhang only ~2mm - I would expect effective xmax to be better

the neodymium version (like mine) seems like it was discontinued a few years ago.

subjectively run wide open, it seemed a bit more mellow than say an EV15B

what is your goal with the low mms ?

Thiele-Small Parameters
Resonant Frequency (Fs)51.2 Hz
DC Resistance (Re)5.32 ohms
Voice Coil Inductance (Le)0.34 mH
Mechanical Q (Qms)10.6
Electromagnetic Q (Qes)0.35
Total Q (Qts)0.34
Compliance Equivalent Volume (Vas)6.44 ft.³
Mechanical Compliance of Suspension (Cms)0.18 mm/N
BL Product (BL)16.04 Tm
Diaphragm Mass Inc. Airload (Mms)52.9g
Maximum Linear Excursion (Xmax)1.9 mm
 
Peavey 1508-8 HE BWX in ferrite and neodymium have ~53g mms
overhang only ~2mm - I would expect effective xmax to be better
the neodymium version (like mine) seems like it was discontinued a few years ago.
subjectively run wide open, it seemed a bit more mellow than say an EV15B
what is your goal with the low mms ?
Thiele-Small Parameters
Resonant Frequency (Fs)51.2 Hz
DC Resistance (Re)5.32 ohms
Voice Coil Inductance (Le)0.34 mH
Mechanical Q (Qms)10.6
Electromagnetic Q (Qes)0.35
Total Q (Qts)0.34
Compliance Equivalent Volume (Vas)6.44 ft.³
Mechanical Compliance of Suspension (Cms)0.18 mm/N
BL Product (BL)16.04 Tm
Diaphragm Mass Inc. Airload (Mms)52.9g
Maximum Linear Excursion (Xmax)1.9 mm

Great (but discontinued), i've performed some tests with a guitar loudspeaker array (i don't matter about the fact "that it is not in the hifi marketing range" since the room resonances are by far the worst thing to face).
It works well but i want to replace the array by only one loudspeaker.

Then you might consider a low Qts pro driver with as low an Fs as possible.

Yes, you are right, but i'm chasing a low FR with a QTS<0.75 and a light membrane in order to reduce the radiation energy pattern at the maximum on a very specific room mode.
 
Why not use an active (or passive if you prefer) notch filter?

Because that i've found (in an equalization session) that a multi sub configuration that exploiting each room mode is better, i use closed boxes and dipolar loudspeakers.
There is a multi sub configuration in my room that can partially contourn the room resonances problem and obtain a great CSD graph without any treatement or equalization.
 
Low Mms is useful but better still is low Mms + High BL. If you've got a stronger motor you can move a slightly higher Mms as if it were just as light. Recently I've been dividing Mms by Bl, but I don't know if that's a reasonable thing to do.

So the Peavey would be 52.9/16.04 = 3.298

And this Faital would be 56/17.5 = 3.257

FaitalPRO | LF Loudspeakers | 12FH500

In any case it's at least comparable. (Edit: Er.. if it wasn't for the fact it's a 12", oops)

In any case if you were willing to entertain the idea of a 12" your options would open up considerably.

This Beyma 12" has a very low Qts (0.15) and 25.3 BL. Mms is 67g but if there's any validity whatsoever to my rule of thumb calculation that comes to 2.648.

LOW & MID FREQUENCY 12P80Nd/V2 | Beyma
 
Last edited:
Low Mms is useful but better still is low Mms + High BL. If you've got a stronger motor you can move a slightly higher Mms as if it were just as light. Recently I've been dividing Mms by Bl, but I don't know if that's a reasonable thing to do.
So the Peavey would be 52.9/16.04 = 3.298
And this Faital would be 56/17.5 = 3.257
FaitalPRO | LF Loudspeakers | 12FH500
In any case it's at least comparable. (Edit: Er.. if it wasn't for the fact it's a 12", oops)
In any case if you were willing to entertain the idea of a 12" your options would open up considerably.
This Beyma 12" has a very low Qts (0.15) and 25.3 BL. Mms is 67g but if there's any validity whatsoever to my rule of thumb calculation that comes to 2.648.
LOW & MID FREQUENCY 12P80Nd/V2 | Beyma

My cab is already dilled for a 18' and i have an adaptor for a 15', i've already tested a 12' and my (very) high Mms 18' sound cleaner.

I'm confident into reliable manufacturers expertise and i don't know what are the mecanical requirements for a cone to sound right.

As Freddi's said the cones seems to go flabby under a 60Gr of Mms (for a 15) and in the 55-80Hz range, i'm afraid of the signal tracking.
There are no loudspeakers able to track a complex LF audio signal and a high Mms can't be controlled only by its mecanical suspension, too stiff there is a lack of dynamics and too loose there is no control.

There are a lot of reliable manufactuers that produce good cheap 15' woofers with a Mms of 60-80Gr... it seems to be the range for a good signal tracking in the "high lows" IMHO
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
The JBL M115-8A has a MMS of 53, and can be picked up cheaply in used JRX115 cabinets. I use these drivers crossed to a horn/cd at 800Hz and really like them.
 

Attachments

  • m115-8a.jpg
    m115-8a.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 158
The JBL M115-8A has a MMS of 53, and can be picked up cheaply in used JRX115 cabinets. I use these drivers crossed to a horn/cd at 800Hz and really like them.

Not bad at all, but expensive (270€).
Both are fabricated in the USA and the Eminence loudspeakers drivers with equivalent parameters are half of the JBL price.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

These usually have a total mass of 45g.
That's for the whole bag though, not each.

I don't eat them anymore since they are full nanoparticles (titanium dioxide)
... in order to have bright colors.

Theses things has been created to cheer american soldiers during the Second World War, now it kill the children.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.